UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No.     )
Filed by the RegistrantFiled by a Party other than the Registrant
Check the appropriate box:


☐        Preliminary Proxy Statement


☐        Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))


☒        Definitive Proxy Statement


☐        Definitive Additional Materials


☐        Soliciting Material under § 240.14a-12
Quotient Technology Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
Not Applicable.
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)all boxes that apply):


☒        No fee required.


☐        Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

☐    Fee computed on table belowin exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.0-11.
(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5)Total fee paid:

☐        Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

☐        Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)Amount Previously Paid:
(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3)Filing Party:
(4)Date Filed:







quot0001.jpg
PROXY STATEMENT
AND NOTICE FOR 2021
2023 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
















































QUOTIENT TECHNOLOGY INC.
400 LOGUE1260 EAST STRINGHAM AVENUE, SUITE 600
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94043SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84106
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held at 10:00 a.m. PacificMountain Daylight Time on Thursday, JuneAugust 3, 20212023
TO THE STOCKHOLDERS OF QUOTIENT TECHNOLOGY INC.:
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“Annual Meeting”) of Quotient Technology Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Quotient” or the “Company”), will be held onThursday, June August 3, 2021,2023, at 10:00 a.m. PDT,MDT for the following purposes as more fully described in the accompanying proxy statement:purposes:
1.To elect our Board of Directors’ two nominees for Class Isix directors named herein to serve until the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders ("2024 Annual Meeting"), and until their successors are duly elected and qualified, subject to earlier resignation or removal;qualified;
2.To approve the 2023 Equity Incentive Plan;
3.To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules;officers;
3.4.To ratify the selection by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2021;2023; and
4.5.To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.Annual Meeting.
This year'syear’s Annual Meeting will be held as a virtual-only meeting due to the public health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and to support the health and well-being of our employees, directors and stockholders. While you will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting physically, the Annual Meeting has been designed to provide stockholders with the same opportunities to participate in the virtual meeting as they would have had at an in-person meeting. Stockholders of record as of the record dateRecord Date (as defined below) will be able to attend and participate in the Annual Meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/QUOT2021.QUOT2023. To join the meeting, you will need your 16-digit control number as provided in your proxy materials. For further information regarding the virtual meeting, please see the "Questions and Answers" section of the proxy statement.
Only stockholders of record of our common stock at the close of businessbusiness on April 13, 2021 (theJune 23, 2023 (the “Record Date”) will be entitled to receive a notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournments thereof. Further information regarding voting rights and the matters to be voted upon is presented in our proxy statement.
In accordance with SEC rules, we sent a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials on or about April 22, 2021 and provided access to our proxy materials over the internet on or before that date, to the holders of record of our common stock as of the close of business on the Record Date.THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR ALL” OF THE COMPANY’S NOMINEES ON PROPOSAL 1 AND “FOR” PROPOSALS 2, 3, AND 4.
If you have any further questions about voting or attending the Annual Meeting, please contact our proxy solicitor, D.F. King & Co., Inc. ("D.F. King"). Stockholders may call toll-free at (800) 549-6746,967-5051. Brokers and banks and brokers may call collect at (212) 269-5550. D.F. King may also be reached by email at Quot@dfking.comQUOT@dfking.com. If you have any general questions regarding the Annual Meeting, please visit our website at www.quotient.com or contact our investor relations department at (650) 605-4600 (option 7). Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 and our 2021 Proxy Statement are available at https://materials.proxyvote.com/749119103.
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we urge you to submit your vote via the internet, telephone or mail.







We appreciate your continued support of Quotient and look forward to receiving your proxy.Quotient.
By order of the Board of Directors,
quot0002.jpg
Connie ChenPROXY STATEMENT
General Counsel and SecretaryAND NOTICE FOR
Mountain View, California2023 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
April 22, 2021


We are closely monitoring developments related to the COVID-19 pandemic. It could become necessary to change the date, time and/or means of holding the Annual Meeting of Stockholder. If such a change is made, we will announce the change in advance, and details on how to participate will be issued by press release, posted on our website and filed as additional proxy materials.



























As used in this proxy statement, the terms “Quotient,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” mean Quotient Technology Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Quotient” or the “Company”), will be held on August 3, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. MDT for the following purposes:
1.To elect six directors to serve until the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders ("2024 Annual Meeting"), and its subsidiaries unlessuntil their successors are duly elected and qualified;
2.To approve the context indicates otherwise.2023 Equity Incentive Plan;

3.To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers;


4.To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2023; and
quot00031.jpg5.To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting.
This year’s Annual Meeting will be held as a virtual-only meeting. Stockholders of record as of the Record Date (as defined below) will be able to attend and participate in the Annual Meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/QUOT2023. To join the meeting, you will need your 16-digit control number as provided in your proxy materials.
Only stockholders of record of our common stock at the close of business on June 23, 2023 (the “Record Date”) will be entitled to receive a notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournments thereof. Further information regarding voting rights and the matters to be voted upon is presented in our proxy statement.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR ALL” OF THE COMPANY’S NOMINEES ON PROPOSAL 1 AND “FOR” PROPOSALS 2, 3, AND 4.
If you have any further questions about voting or attending the Annual Meeting, please contact our proxy solicitor, D.F. King & Co., Inc. ("D.F. King"). Stockholders may call toll-free at (800) 967-5051. Brokers and banks may call collect at (212) 269-5550. D.F. King may also be reached by email at QUOT@dfking.com.
We appreciate your continued support of Quotient.
By order of the Board of Directors,
quot0002.jpg
PROXY STATEMENT
AND NOTICE FOR 2021
2023 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
to be held on Thursday, June 3, 2021























QUOTIENT TECHNOLOGY INC.
1260 EAST STRINGHAM AVENUE, SUITE 600
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84106
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held at 10:00 a.m. PDTMountain Daylight Time on August 3, 2023

TO THE STOCKHOLDERS OF QUOTIENT TECHNOLOGY INC.:

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“Annual Meeting”) of Quotient Technology Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Quotient” or the “Company”), will be held on August 3, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. MDT for the following purposes:

1.To elect six directors to serve until the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders ("2024 Annual Meeting"), and until their successors are duly elected and qualified;
2.To approve the 2023 Equity Incentive Plan;
3.To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers;
4.To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2023; and
5.To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting.
This year’s Annual Meeting will be held as a virtual-only meeting. Stockholders of record as of the Record Date (as defined below) will be able to attend and participate in the Annual Meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/QUOT2023. To join the meeting, you will need your 16-digit control number as provided in your proxy materials.
Only stockholders of record of our common stock at the close of business on June 23, 2023 (the “Record Date”) will be entitled to receive a notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournments thereof. Further information regarding voting rights and the matters to be voted upon is presented in our proxy statement.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR ALL” OF THE COMPANY’S NOMINEES ON PROPOSAL 1 AND “FOR” PROPOSALS 2, 3, AND 4.
If you have any further questions about voting or attending the Annual Meeting, please contact our proxy solicitor, D.F. King & Co., Inc. ("D.F. King"). Stockholders may call toll-free at (800) 967-5051. Brokers and banks may call collect at (212) 269-5550. D.F. King may also be reached by email at QUOT@dfking.com.
We appreciate your continued support of Quotient.
By order of the Board of Directors,
quot0002.jpg
Connie Chen
General Counsel and Secretary
Salt Lake City, Utah
June 30, 2023











As used in this proxy statement, the terms “Quotient,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” mean Quotient Technology Inc. and its subsidiaries unless the context indicates otherwise.



quot0003.jpg
PROXY STATEMENT
FOR 2023 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
to be held on August 3, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. MDT



This proxy statement and the enclosed form of proxy are furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by ourthe Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Quotient Technology Inc. (“Quotient” or the “Company”) for use at the Annual Meeting of stockholdersStockholders (the "Annual Meeting") to be held atvirtually at 10:00 a.m. PDTMT on Thursday, JuneAugust 3, 2021,2023 and any postponements or adjournments thereof, which we refer to as the Annual Meeting. The Annual Meeting will be held as a virtual-onlyYou can attend the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/QUOT2021QUOT2023 and entering yourthe 16-digit control number as provided in your proxy materials. This proxy statement and the accompanying form of proxy card are first being mailed to stockholders on or about April 22, 2021.June 30, 2023. Our annual report for the year ended December 31, 20202022 is enclosed with this proxy statement. This proxy statement contains important information for you to consider when deciding how to vote on the matters brought before the Annual Meeting. Please read it carefully.


1


PROXY SUMMARY
Business Performance
2020 was a year of progress for Quotient. Although the global pandemic caused many challenges, we stayed the course and focused on delivering value through our solutions for consumer-packaged goods (CPGs) manufacturers, our retail partners and consumers. We published our first ever Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) report outlining our commitment to sustainability and how we are making meaningful efforts in the areas of diversity and inclusion, protecting and contributing to our society and making a positive impact on our environment.
Highlights
We ended 2020 strong as CPGs rebounded from earlier impacts of the pandemic in the first half of the year. Q4 revenue was up 20% over Q4 2019 and up 18% over Q3 2020. We ended 2020 with annual revenues of $445.9 million or 2% growth over the prior year.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic we executed a plan in Q2 that sustained our business and employment levels during the market downturn. As a result, we experienced no material disruptions to normal operations.
We added invaluable best-in-class talent to strengthen our organization and guide our future.
We experienced 3% growth in new CPG customers and 11% growth in brand expansion, as well as more demand and higher spend commitments from our existing customers due to the effectiveness of our platform and solutions.
We grew our retailer relationships with four new partnerships added to our network, including Shipt, 7-Eleven, Rite Aid and Hy-Vee.
We improved our forecasting ability and accuracy with collaborative processes and procedures for go-to-market, bookings and pipeline building — a crucial component for insight into our future outlook.
We rolled out our first long-term financial outlook in November 2020, reflecting 15% to 20% projected revenue growth CAGR along with margin expansion over the next three years.
Compensation
Say-On-Pay
At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders on June 3, 2020, 53% of votes were cast in favor of the advisory Proposal on Executive Compensation, commonly known as “Say-On-Pay”. In response, we engaged directly with our stockholders to solicit feedback and input. These conversations were very beneficial and resulted in several significant changes to our executive compensation programs which included increasing the portion of our long-term equity compensation that is at-risk and performance-based. These changes were directly in response to this stockholder feedback and were implemented for our 2021 compensation plan. For more information please see “Executive Compensation - Compensation Overview - 2020 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation.” 
Compensation Changes in Response to Stockholder Feedback:
Effective 2021, 50% of long-term equity awards to NEOs will be subject to the achievement of 3-year quantitative performance hurdles. Gross margin dollars and a stock price modifier were selected as the performance metrics to align with our three-year financial plan.
We re-aligned the composition of our compensation peer group to better reflect our current profile which resulted in the removal of a number of companies, and the addition of others.

2


2020 Compensation Highlights
While our business performance ended the year in a much stronger position than we expected, it was impacted significantly by the market contraction and challenges such as supply chain disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic in the first half of 2020. The performance targets under our Annual Incentive Plan that govern annual incentive awards were established in February pre-pandemic and were not adjusted during the year. Our full year performance did not meet achievement threshold targets required for our CEO, Mr. Boal, to earn his annual incentive payout in 2020.
For named executive officers other than Mr. Boal, our full year performance met the threshold targets necessary for those participants to earn payouts, but following a recommendation from the leadership team, the Compensation Committee reduced such formulaic payouts from 60% to 25% to align with the payout approved for non-executive Annual Incentive Plan participants. The payout approved for the non-executive participants followed a decision made by the leadership team in Q2, with support of the Compensation Committee and the Board, to suspend the normal operation of the Annual Incentive Plan in response to the market contraction caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. This decision enabled the Company to avoid employee layoffs and other adverse employment actions while delivering sustainable financial performance.
3



QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
The information provided in the “question and answer” format below is for your convenience only and is merely a summary of the information contained in this proxy statement. You should read this entire proxy statement carefully. Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not intended to be incorporated by reference intoWhy am I receiving these materials?
Our Board has sent you this proxy statement and referencesthe accompanying proxy card to ask for your vote, as a stockholder of Quotient, on certain matters that will be voted on at the Annual Meeting.
As previously announced, on June 20, 2023, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (“Merger Agreement”) with CB Neptune Holdings, LLC ("Neptune"), pursuant to which Neptune will, subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, acquire the Company (the “Proposed Acquisition”), and pursuant to which the Company will continue as the surviving corporation operating as a wholly owned subsidiary of Neptune.
The Proposed Acquisition is subject to certain closing conditions, including approval of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and the Proposed Acquisition by our website addressstockholders. Accordingly, the Proposed Acquisition will not be closed as of the date of the Annual Meeting, if ever. Our Board approved the transactions underlying the Proposed Acquisition, including the Company entering into the Merger Agreement, and recommended that the Company’s stockholders approve the Proposed Acquisition at a special meeting of stockholders to be held in this proxy statementthe coming months, but stockholders are inactive textual references only.NOT being requested to vote upon the Proposed Acquisition at the Annual Meeting.
In advance of presenting the Proposed Acquisition to Company stockholders for a vote, and continuing thereafter until, and if, the Proposed Acquisition closes, the Company will continue to operate on a standalone basis.
What matters am I voting on?on in connection with the Annual Meeting?
You will be voting on:
a proposal for the election of our Board’s two nominees for Class Isix directors named herein to hold officeserve until the 2024 annual meeting of stockholdersAnnual Meeting and until their successors are duly elected and qualified subject to earlier resignation or removal;(Proposal No. 1);

a proposal to approve the 2023 Equity Incentive Plan (Proposal No. 2);
a proposal to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with SEC rules;(Proposal No. 3);

a proposal to ratify the selection by the Audit Committee of our Board of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2021;2023 (Proposal No. 4); and

anysuch other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting.
At the date of this proxy statement, except as noted below, we have not received any notice regarding any other matter to come before the Annual Meeting.
How does the Board recommend I vote on these proposals?
The Board recommends a vote:
FOR the election of Steve Horowitz and Christy Wyatt, as Class Isix directors to hold officeserve until the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified subject to earlier resignation or removal;(Proposal No. 1);
FOR the approval of the 2023 Equity Incentive Plan (Proposal No. 2);
FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers described in this proxy statement;(Proposal No. 3); and
FOR the ratification of the selection by the Audit Committee of our Board of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2021.2023 (Proposal No. 4).
Who is entitled to vote?
Holders of our common stock as of the closeclose of business on April 13, 2021June 23, 2023 (the “Record Date”), may vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, we had 93,359,430 there were 98,666,903 shares of commoncommon stock outstanding. In deciding all matters at the Annual Meeting, each holder of common stock of Quotient will be entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held as of the close of business on the Record Date. We do not have cumulative voting rights for the election of directors.
2


Registered Stockholders. If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares, and the proxy materials were provided to you directly by us. Asthe stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to the individuals listed on the proxy card or to vote. Stockholders of record may vote during(i) by filling out and signing the proxy card that was included with this Proxy Statement and returning it in the envelope provided, (ii) by calling the toll-free number found on the proxy card, or (iii) online at the internet voting website provided on the proxy card. Stockholders of record may also vote by attending the Annual Meeting.
Street Name Stockholders. Stockholders. If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered thea beneficial owner of shares held in street name, and the proxy materials were forwarded to you bywill receive instructions from your broker, bank or other nominee who is considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker or nomineeon how to vote your shares. Beneficial owners are also invited to attend and vote during the Annual Meeting. If you request areceived printed copycopies of the proxy materials by mail, your broker or nominee will provide ayou may also vote by filling out the voting instruction card for youform and returning it in the envelope provided. The availability of online or phone voting may depend on the voting process of the organization that holds your shares. Beneficial owners who want to use.attend and also vote at the Annual Meeting will need to obtain a legal proxy, in PDF or Image (gif, jpg, or png) file format, from the organization that holds their shares giving them the right to vote their shares at the Annual Meeting and by presenting it with their online ballot during the meeting. Throughout this proxy, we refer to stockholders who hold their shares through a broker, bank or other nominee as “street name holders.”

4


How do I vote if I am a stockholder of record?
vote by internetinternet— visit www.proxyvote.com, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, until 11:59 p.m. EDT on JuneAugust 2, 20212023 (have your proxy card in hand when you visit the website);
vote by telephone—call toll-free at 1-800-690-6903 (have your proxy card in hand when you call);
vote by mail—simply complete, sign and date the enclosed proxy card and return it before the Annual Meeting in the postage-paid envelope provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717; or
vote during the Annual Meeting—visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/QUOT2021.QUOT2023.
How do I vote if I am a street name holder?
Street name holders may submit their voting instructions by internet or telephone using the information provided by their respective brokers or other nominees and may complete and mail voting instruction forms to their respective brokers or nominees. Street name holders can also vote during the Annual Meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/QUOT2021.QUOT2023.
Can I change my vote?
Yes. If you are a stockholder of record, you can change your vote or revoke your proxy any time before the Annual Meeting by:
entering a new vote by internet or by telephone (until 11:59 p.m. EDT on JuneAugust 2, 2021)2023);
returning a later-dated proxy card so that it is received prior to the Annual Meeting;
notifying the Secretary of Quotient, in writing, at 400 Logue1260 East Stringham Avenue, Mountain View, CA 94043;Suite 600, Salt Lake City, Utah 84106; or
voting during the Annual Meeting— Meetingvisit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/QUOT2021.QUOT2023.
Street name holders may change their voting instructions by submitting new instructions by internet or by telephone or by returning a later-dated voting instruction form to their respective brokers or nominees. Street name holders can also change their vote by voting during the Annual meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/QUOT2021.QUOT2023.
What should I do if I needreceive more than one proxy card or set of proxy materials from the Company?
Your shares may be owned through more than one brokerage or other share ownership account. In order to vote all of the shares that you own, you must use each proxy card you receive in order to vote with respect to each account by telephone, by Internet, or by signing, dating and returning the proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided.
3


How will my shares be voted if I return the enclosed proxy card?
The shares represented by any proxy card that is properly executed and received by the Company prior to or at the Annual Meeting will be voted in accordance with the specifications made on that proxy card. Where a choice has been specified on the proxy card with respect to the proposals, the shares represented by the proxy card will be voted in accordance with the specifications.
The Board of Directors is not aware of any matters that are expected to come before the Annual Meeting other than those described in this proxy statement. If any other matter should be presented at the Annual Meeting upon which a vote may be properly taken, shares represented by all proxy cards received by the Board of Directors will be voted with respect thereto at the discretion of the person or persons named as proxies in the enclosed proxy card.
If you return a validly executed proxy card without indicating how your shares should be voted on a matter and you do not revoke your proxy, your proxy will be voted: “FOR ALL” of the Board of Directors’ director nominees: Tracey Figurelli, Matthew Krepsik, Robert McDonald, Joseph Reece, Kate Vanek, and Michael Wargotz] (Proposal No. 1); “FOR” the approval of the 2023 Equity Incentive Plan (Proposal No. 2); “FOR” the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers (Proposal No. 3); and “FOR” the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2023 (Proposal No. 4).
If I am a street name stockholder, will my shares be voted if I do not provide instructions?
In some cases, your shares may be voted if they are held in the name of a brokerage firm, even if you do not provide the brokerage firm with voting instructions. Specifically, brokerage firms have the authority under New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules to cast votes on certain “routine” matters if they do not receive instructions from the beneficial holder. Ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal No. 4) is typicallyconsidered a routine matter for which a brokerage firm may vote shares for which it has not received voting instructions. This is called a “broker discretionary vote.” When a proposal is not a routine matter and a brokerage firm has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares with respect to that proposal, the brokerage firm cannot vote the shares on that proposal. This is called a “broker non-vote.” Proposal Nos. 1, 2 and 3 are not considered routine matters. If you do not provide voting instructions to your broker with respect to these matters, it will result in a broker non-vote with respect to such proposals. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of these proposals.
How will the Annual Meeting be conducted?
The Annual Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting of stockholders. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will be limited to stockholders of the Company as of the Record Date and guests of the Company. You will not be able to attend the virtual-only Annual Meeting?Meeting in person at a physical location.
Attending the Virtual Annual Meeting. You can attend the Annual Meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/QUOT2021, QUOT2023, where you will be able to listen to the meeting live, submit questions and vote online. To enter the Annual Meeting, you will need your 16-digit control number as provided in your proxy materials if you are a stockholder of record, or included with your voting information provided by your respective brokers or nominees if you are a street name holder.
The Annual Meeting will begin promptly at 10:00 a.m. PDT.MDT. We encourage you to access the meeting in advance to ensure you are logged in when the meeting starts. Online registration will begin at 9:45 a.m. PDT,MDT, and you should allow ample time for the registration procedures.
What if I haveTechnical Disruptions. In the event of any technical difficulties beforedisruptions or connectivity issues during the meeting?
If you are having difficulties accessingcourse of the Annual Meeting, during registration please allow for some time for the meeting website to refresh automatically, and/or for the meeting time, pleaseoperator to provide updates through the phone bridge. You can also call the technical support number that will be posted on the Annual Meeting registration page.
How Can I Submit QuestionsStockholder List. We will make available a list of registered stockholders as of the Record Date for inspection by stockholders from July 24, 2023 through August 3, 2023 at our headquarters located at 1260 East Stringham Avenue, Suite 600, Salt Lake City, Utah 84106. If you wish to inspect the list, please submit your request, along with proof of ownership, by email to IR@quotient.com. The stockholder list will also be available electronically on the meeting website during the live webcast of the Annual Meeting.
4


Voting by Ballot at the Annual Meeting?
StockholdersMeeting. Registered stockholders and street name stockholders who wish to vote by ballot at the Annual Meeting can submit questionsdo so electronically before the polls close during the meetingAnnual Meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/QUOT2021QUOT2023 and entering your 16-digit control number. Once loggedHowever, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, the Company recommends that you vote your shares in clickadvance, so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the "Q&A" button, typeAnnual Meeting. If you have voted your question, and click "Submit".
Aftershares prior to the business portionstart of the Annual Meeting, concludesyour vote has been received by the Company’s inspector of elections and the meetingthere is adjourned, we will hold a Q&A session during which we intendno need to answer all questions submitted during the meeting that are pertinent to the Company and the items being brought before the stockholder vote at the Annual Meeting, as time permits and in accordance with our rules of procedure for the Annual Meeting. Any remaining questions submittedthose shares during the Annual Meeting, unless you wish to revoke or change your vote.
How can I ask questions at the Annual Meeting?
You may submit a question during the Annual Meeting by typing your question in the "Ask A Question" section and clicking "SUBMIT." Additional information regarding the ability of stockholders to ask questions during the Annual Meeting will be addressed by contacting our IR Department at IR@quotient.com.
5


included in the rules of conduct that will be available on the Annual Meeting website.
What is the effect of giving a proxy?
Proxies are solicited by and on behalf of our Board. Steven BoalRobert McDonald, Matthew Krepsik and Connie Chen have been designated as proxies by our Board. When proxy votes are properly dated, executed and returned, the shares represented by such proxies will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions of the stockholder. If you properly complete and submit a validly executed proxy card, but no specific instructions are given, however, the shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of our Board as described above. If any matters not described in the Proxy Statementproxy statement are properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders will use their own judgment to determine how to vote your shares. If the Annual Meeting is adjourned, the proxy holders can vote your shares at the adjourned meeting date as well, unless you have properly revoked your proxy instructions, as described above.
What is a quorum?
A quorum is the minimum number of shares required to be present at the Annual Meeting for the meeting to be properly held under our Amended and Restated Bylaws (our “Bylaws”) and Delaware state law. The presence, in person or by proxy, of a majority of the voting power of the shares of stock entitled to vote at the meeting will constitute a quorum at the meeting. A proxy submitted by a stockholder may indicate that the shares represented by the proxy are not being voted (“stockholder withholding”) with respect to a particular matter. In addition, a broker may not be permitted to vote on shares held in street name on a particular matter in the absence of instructions from the beneficial owner of the stock (“broker non-vote”). The shares subject to a proxy which are not being voted on a particular matter because of either stockholder withholding or"Abstentions," "withhold" votes, and broker non-votes will count for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. Abstentions are counted in the determination of a quorum.
How many votes are needed for approval of each matter?
Proposal No. 1: Election of six directors to serve until the 2024 Annual Meeting and until their successors are duly elected and qualified.The election of directors requireswill be determined by a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of sharesstockholders present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote thereon, to be approved. “Plurality”thereon. This means that the nomineessix director candidates who receive the largesthighest number of votes cast “FOR” are elected as directors. Only votes “FOR” will affect the outcome,outcome. Withhold votes and any shares not voted “FOR” a particular nominee (including as a result of stockholder withholding or a broker non-vote)non-votes will not be counted in such nominee’s favor.affect the outcome of the vote on the election of a director.
Proposal No. 2: The advisory approval2: Approval of the compensation of our named executive officers2023 Equity Incentive Plan. This proposal must receive the affirmative vote of a majority in voting power of the votes cast by the holders of shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote thereon to be approved. Abstentions are considered votes present and entitled to vote on this proposal, and thus have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.
Proposal No. 3: The ratificationApproval, on an advisory basis, of the appointmentcompensation of Ernst & Young LLPour named executive officers. This proposal must receive the affirmative vote of a majority in voting power of the votes cast by the holders of shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote thereon to be approved. Abstentions are considered votes present and entitled to vote on this proposal, and thus have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.
How
5


Proposal No. 4Ratification of appointment of independent registered accounting firm. This proposal must receive the affirmative vote of a majority in voting power of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote thereon to be approved. Abstentions are proxies solicited forconsidered votes present and entitled to vote on this proposal, and thus have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the proposal.
Who will count the votes?
American Election Services, LLC will serve as the independent inspector of election (the “Inspector of Election”) and, in such capacity, will count and tabulate the votes.
Will there be a proxy contest at the Annual Meeting?
TheNo. In March 2022, Engaged Capital, LLC and certain of its affiliates (the “Engaged Group”) provided notice of their intent to nominate directors for every available seat for election to the Board is soliciting proxies for use at the Annual Meeting. All expenses associatedHowever, on June 5, 2023, the Company entered into a Cooperation Agreement with this solicitationthe Engaged Group, pursuant to which the Engaged Group withdrew its intent to nominate directors (the "Second Cooperation Agreement"). Prior to last year's annual meeting of stockholders, the Company and the Engaged Group likewise had entered into a Cooperation Agreement (the "First Cooperation Agreement"), as described more fully below). As a result, there will be borneno proxy contest at the Annual Meeting. For additional information regarding the provisions of the First Cooperation Agreement and the Second Cooperation Agreement, see “Corporate Governance and Directors—First Cooperation Agreement with the Engaged Group” and "Corporate Governance and Directors—Second Cooperation Agreement with the Engaged Group”.
How will the Second Cooperation Agreement impact voting at the Annual Meeting?
Pursuant to the Second Cooperation Agreement, the Engaged Group will vote all shares of common stock and voting securities beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by Quotient.the Engaged Group at the Annual Meeting in favor of all proposals, in accordance with the Board’s recommendations. In the event that Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. issues a contrary recommendation on Proposals 2, 3 or 4, the Engaged Group will be permitted to vote on such proposals in its own discretion. For a description of the Engaged Group’s beneficial ownership of common stock, see “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.”
Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?
We intend to announce preliminary voting results based on the advice of our Inspector of Elections at the Annual Meeting. We also expect to disclose preliminary voting results based on the preliminary tabulation by the Inspector of Election on a Current Report on Form 8-K that we will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) within four business days after the Annual Meeting. We will reimburse brokersreport voting results based on the Inspector of Election’s final, certified report on a Current Report on Form 8-K that we will file with the SEC as soon as practicable.
Who can help answer any other questions I may have?
If you have any questions or other nominees for reasonable expenses that they incur in sending theserequire any assistance with voting your shares, or if you need additional copies of the proxy materials, to you if a broker or other nominee holds your shares. In addition to solicitation by mail, some ofplease contact our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies in person or by telephone for no additional compensation. We have retained proxy solicitor:


image.jpg
D.F. King & Co., Inc., to assist in the solicitation of proxies under customary terms
48 Wall Street, 22nd Floor
New York, New York 10005
Stockholders Call Toll-Free: (800) 967-5051
Brokers and anticipate that this will cost us approximately $8,500 plus certain out-of-pocket expenses.Banks Call Collect: (212) 269-5550



Email: QUOT@dfking.com
6


How may my brokerage firm or other intermediary vote my shares if I fail to provide timely directions?
Brokerage firms and other intermediaries holding shares of common stock in street name for customers are generally required to vote such shares in the manner directed by their customers. In the absence of timely directions, your broker may have discretion to vote your shares in its discretion. Under the rules of the NYSE, brokers, banks and other securities intermediaries that are subject to NYSE rules may use their discretion to vote your “uninstructed” shares with respect to all matters considered to be “routine” under NYSE rules, but not with respect to “non-routine” matters. In this regard, the proposal to ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP (Proposal No. 3) is considered to be a “routine” matter under NYSE rules, meaning that if you do not return voting instructions to your broker by its deadline, your shares may be voted by your broker in its discretion on this proposal. Your broker will not have discretion to vote on (i) the election of directors (Proposal No. 1) and (ii) advisory approval of the compensation of our named executive officers (Proposal No. 2), which are considered “non-routine” matters under NYSE rules.
Why did I receive a notice in the mail regarding the internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?
Pursuant to rules adopted by the SEC, Quotient has elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the internet. Accordingly, we have sent you a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice of Internet Availability”) with instructions on how to access the proxy materials online or request a printed copy of the materials.
Stockholders may follow the instructions in the Notice of Internet Availability to elect to receive future proxy materials in print by mail or electronically by email. We encourage stockholders to take advantage of the availability of the proxy materials online to help reduce the environmental impact of our annual meetings, and reduce Quotient’s printing and mailing costs.
I share an address with another stockholder, and we received only one paper copy of the proxy materials. How may I obtain an additional copy of the proxy materials?
Quotient has adopted a procedure called “householding.”  Under this procedure, Quotient may deliver a single copy of the Notice of Internet Availability and, if you requested printed versions by mail, this Proxy Statement and the Annual Report to multiple stockholders who share the same address, unless Quotient has received contrary instructions from one or more stockholders. This procedure reduces the environmental impact of our annual meetings and reduces Quotient’s printing and mailing costs. Stockholders who participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy cards. Upon written or oral request, Quotient will deliver promptly a separate copy of the Notice of Internet Availability and, if you requested printed versions by mail, this Proxy Statement and the Annual Report to any stockholder that elects not to participate in householding.
To receive, free of charge, a separate copy of the Notice of Internet Availability and, if you requested printed versions by mail, this Proxy Statement or the Annual Report, or separate copies of any future notice, proxy statement, or annual report, you may write or call Quotient at the following email address, physical address, or phone number:

IR@quotient.com
Quotient Technology Inc.
Attention: Investor Relations
400 Logue Avenue
Mountain View, California 94043
(650) 605-4600 (option 7)
If you are receiving more than one copy of the proxy materials at a single address and would like to participate in householding, please contact Quotient at the email address, physical address, or phone number above. Stockholders who hold shares in “street name” may contact their brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer, or other similar organization to request information about householding.

7


Is my vote confidential?
Proxy instructions, ballots, and voting tabulations that identify individual stockholders are handled in a manner that protects your voting privacy. Your vote will not be disclosed either within Quotient or to third parties, except as necessary to meet applicable legal requirements, to allow for the tabulation of votes and certification of the vote, or to facilitate a successful proxy solicitation.
Who will pay for the cost of this proxy solicitation?
We will bear the cost of this proxy solicitation. In addition to solicitation by mail, some of our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies in person or by telephone for no additional compensation. We will also ask stockholders of record who are brokerage firms, custodians and fiduciaries to forward proxy materials to the beneficial owners of such shares and upon request we will reimburse such stockholders of record for the customary costs of forwarding the proxy materials. We have retained D.F. King & Co., Inc. to assist in the solicitation of proxies under customary terms and anticipate that this will cost us approximately $8,500 plus certain out-of-pocket expenses.
Stockholder Proposals
Stockholders may present proper proposals for inclusion in our proxy statement and for consideration at the next annual meeting of stockholders by submitting their proposals in writing to our Secretary in a timely manner. For a stockholder proposal to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement for our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our Secretary must receive the written proposal at our principal executive offices not later than December 23, 2021. In addition, stockholder proposals must comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, regarding the inclusion of stockholder proposals in Company-sponsored proxy materials. Stockholder proposals should be addressed to:
Quotient Technology Inc.
Attention: Investor Relations
400 Logue Avenue
Mountain View, California 94043
Our Bylaws also establish an advance notice procedure for stockholders who wish to present a proposal before an annual meeting of stockholders but do not intend for the proposal to be included in our proxy statement. Our Bylaws provide that the only business that may be conducted at an annual meeting is business that is (i) specified in our proxy materials with respect to such meeting, (ii) otherwise properly brought before the annual meeting by or at the direction of our Board, or (iii) otherwise properly brought before the annual meeting by a stockholder of record entitled to vote at the annual meeting who has delivered timely written notice to our Secretary, which notice must contain the information specified in our Bylaws. To be timely for our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our Secretary must receive the written notice at our principal executive offices:
no earlier than February 3, 2022; and
no later than the close of business on March 5, 2022.
In the event that we hold our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders more than 30 days before or more than 30 days after the one-year anniversary of the Annual Meeting, then notice of a stockholder proposal that is not intended to be included in our proxy statement must be received no earlier than the close of business on the 120th day before such annual meeting and no later than the close of business on the later of the following two dates:
the 90th day prior to such annual meeting; or
the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such annual meeting is first made.
If a stockholder who has notified us of his, her or its intention to present a proposal at an annual meeting does not appear to present his, her or its proposal at such annual meeting, we are not required to present the proposal for a vote at such annual meeting.
8


Nomination of Director Candidates
You may propose director candidates for consideration by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Any such recommendations should include the nominee’s name and qualifications for membership on our Board and should be directed to our Secretary at the address set forth above. For additional information regarding stockholder recommendations for director candidates, see “Board and Corporate Governance—Stockholder Recommendations for Nominations to the Board.”
In addition, our Bylaws permit stockholders to nominate directors for election at an annual meeting of stockholders. To nominate a director, the stockholder must provide the information required by our Bylaws. In addition, the stockholder must give timely notice to our Secretary in accordance with our Bylaws, which, in general, require that the notice be received by our Secretary within the time period described above under “Stockholder Proposals” for stockholder proposals that are not intended to be included in a proxy statement.
Availability of Bylaws
You may contact our Secretary at our principal executive offices for a copy of the relevant bylaw provisions regarding the requirements for making stockholder proposals and nominating director candidates.

9



PROPOSAL NO. 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Our Board has the authority to establish the authorized number of directors from time to time by resolution. Our Board currently consists of eight members. Our Amendedten members and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (our “Restated Certificate”) and our Bylaws provide for a classified Board consisting of threeis currently divided into two classes of directors, Class I and Class II, with the directors serving staggered three-year terms.in Class II having a term that expires at the Annual Meeting and the directors in Class I having a term expiring at the 2024 Annual Meeting. As of the close of the Annual Meeting, our Board will consist of seven Class I members. Pursuant to the Second Cooperation Agreement, two of our current directors, Alison Hawkins and Eric Higgs, have agreed to resign from the Board effective as of the Annual Meeting. Also pursuant to the Second Cooperation Agreement, three of our current directors, Andrew Gessow, Lorraine Hariton and David Oppenheimer, have agreed not to stand for re-election to the Board at the Annual Meeting.
Directors in a particular classOn June 29, 2022, we amended our Charter to phase out the classified Board so that the Board will be fully declassified from and after the election of directors at the 2024 Annual Meeting. The directors standing for election at the Annual Meeting will be elected for a three-yearone-year term expiring at the annual meeting2024 Annual Meeting.
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS URGES YOU TO VOTE “FOR ALL” OF THE COMPANY’S NOMINEES BY USING THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD.
Nominees for Director
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has recommended, and our Board of stockholdersDirectors has approved, Tracey Figurelli, Matthew Krepsik, Robert McDonald, Joseph Reece, Kate Vanek, and Michael Wargotz as nominees for election as directors at the Annual Meeting. All but Ms. Figurelli and Ms. Vanek are current members of our Board.
Each of Messrs. Krepsik and McDonald were previously elected by our stockholders. Messrs. Reece and Wargotz were recommended by the Engaged Group, the constituent affiliates of which collectively comprise a major stockholder of the Company, and were appointed to the Board pursuant to the First Cooperation Agreement. The First Cooperation Agreement expired by its terms on March 1, 2023. Ms. Figurelli and Ms. Vanek have been jointly agreed-to as nominees by the Company and the Engaged Group, pursuant to the Second Cooperation Agreement. If elected, each of Messrs. Krepsik, McDonald, Reece and Wargotz, as well as each of Mses. Figurelli and Vanek, will join those directors already serving in Class I as of the year in which their terms expire. As a result, only oneAnnual Meeting to create single class of directors, will be elected at each annual meetingdenominated as Class I, having a term expiring as of the 2024 Annual Meeting of stockholders and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified.
Tracey Figurelli has been nominated for election to the Board pursuant to the Second Cooperation Agreement. Since 2020, Ms. Figurelli has served as a director-level advisor with Andra Partners, a buy-side advisory firm to middle market supporting thematic private equity and strategic clients with current investment fund sizes ranging from $100 million to $1.2 billion. From 2001 to 2020, Ms. Figurelli served in multiple executive roles with RGP Consulting, a public global consultancy staffing firm, in which her roles included EVP, Digital Innovation & Integrated Solutions (2015-2020), Global Managing Director (2012-2015), Managing Director (2009-2012) and Consultant and Client Service Director (2001-2009). Prior to that, Ms. Figurelli served as Director, Corporate Financial Operations & Systems for Prudential Financial, where she established a quality control environment to ensure the other classes continuingintegrity of the financial reporting. Ms. Figurelli currently serves on the board of directors of multiple private companies in the technology space including Analytic Edge and EvoluteIQ. Ms. Figurelli holds a B.A. and M.B.A degrees from Seton Hall University. Ms. Figurelli is qualified to serve on our Board because of her board experience in the technology sector generally and, specifically, with software platform (SaaS) companies; her experience as an M&A advisor at all stages of a transaction from identifying-transaction partners to transaction structuring, engagement and closing; and her experience as an advisor on new product development, strategy and go-to-market execution in the information management services space.
Matthew Krepsik has served as CEO of the Company since May 2022 and as a member of our Board since June 2022. Mr. Krepsikpreviously served as our Chief Technology Officer from June 2021 through May 2022, leading the Company’s strategy and insights team as well as its engineering, product management, business development and media strategy functions. Mr. Krepsik was also responsible for the remainderinformation technology ("IT") function for the Company. Prior to his promotion to Chief Technology Officer, Mr. Krepsik served as our Chief Analytics Officer from April 2021 through June 2021, having joined the Company in April 2021. Prior to joining Quotient, Mr. Krepsik served for 15 years in various managerial roles at Nielsen, a publicly traded company, most recently as Senior Vice President and General Manager of their respective three-year term. Each director’s term continuesOutcomes Products (2019-2021), in
7


which he led Nielsen's development and deployment of attribution, media planning and activation products. Mr. Krepsik's other positions at Nielsen included Global Head of Analytics Products (2016-2019), Executive Director of Analytics Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa (2012-2016), and Vice President, Analytics NorthAmerica (2006-2012). He also had an integral role in Nielsen’s strategic review process, which culminated in the sale of its NielsenIQ business to Advent International for $2.7 billion. Mr. Krepsik’s academic career includes coursework at the London School of Economics as well as Bachelors and Master’s degrees in Economics from Marshall University and Miami University, respectively. We have determined that Mr. Krepsik is qualified to serve as a member of our Board due not only to his status as CEO but also his deep digital industry experience as well as his institutional knowledge and operational experience acquired from leading the Company’s strategy and insights team as well as its engineering, product management, business development and media strategy functions.
Robert McDonald has served on our Board since November 2018 and as Chairman of our Board since March 2022. Though not presently serving on any other public company boards, Mr. McDonald has served throughout his career on boards of various companies and organizations, private and public, non-profit and for-profit. Mr. McDonald served as the U.S. Secretary of Veterans Affairs from July 2014 until January 2017. Mr. McDonald was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Procter & Gamble Company, a publicly traded company, from January 2010 until June 2013. Mr. McDonald joined Procter & Gamble in 1980 and served in various positions for that company. He was named Procter & Gamble’s Vice Chairman, Global Operations in 2004; Chief Operating Officer in 2007; President and Chief Executive Officer in 2009; and Chairman of the electionBoard in 2010. Mr. McDonald has served on the board of directors of Audia Group since 2017, a private international plastics producer company, and qualificationhas served as chairman of the West Point Association of Graduates, a private non-profit organization, since January 2022. From 2005 to July 2014, Mr. McDonald served on the board of directors of Xerox Corporation, a provider of document management solutions, and from January 2014 to July 2014 Mr. McDonald served on the board of directors of United States Steel Corporation, an integrated steel producer, both of which are public companies. Mr. McDonald served on the board of directors of Partnership for Public Service from 2017 to 2021, served on the board of directors of Institute for Veterans and Military Families from 2018 to 2021, and served on the board of directors as Chairman of RallyPoint Networks from 2017 to 2022. Mr. McDonald graduated from the United States Military Academy at West Point in 1975. He earned his M.B.A. from the University of Utah in 1978. We have determined that Mr. McDonald is qualified to serve as a member of our Board because of his ordeep industry experience and knowledge of operational matters. Additionally, his extensive experience as a public company executive and director allows him to provide valuable knowledge and guidance to the Board and to enable him to lead effectively in his capacity as Chairman of the Board.
Joseph ("Joe") Reece has served on our Board since May 2022. Mr. Reece has been the co-managing partner of SilverBox Capital, LLC, and its predecessors since 2015. He previously served as the executive vice chair of UBS Group and head of UBS Securities LLC’s Investment Bank for the Americas from 2017 to 2018. Prior to these roles, he was at Credit Suisse from 1997 to 2015, in roles of increasing responsibility, including serving as global head of Equity Capital Markets and co-head of Credit Risk. His prior experience includes serving as an attorney for 10 years, including at the law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP and at the Securities and Exchange Commission where he ultimately served as Special Counsel to the Division of Corporation Finance. He is currently a member of the board of directors of NCR Corporation where he serves as Lead Independent Director and Compass Minerals where he serves as Chairman of the Board, both of which are public companies. Joe has previously served as a member of the board of directors of SilverBox Engaged Merger Corp. I, including as the executive chair, Atlas Technical Consultants, Inc. and its predecessor company, Boxwood Merger Corp., where he served as lead independent director, Del Frisco's Restaurant Group, Inc., RumbleOn, Inc., CST Brands, Inc., LSB Industries, Inc., and UBS Securities LLC. Mr. Reece earned his B.S., M.B.A. and J.D. from the University of Akron and his LL.M from the Georgetown University Law Center. We have determined that Mr. Reece is qualified to serve as a member of our Board because of his expertise in finance and investment and his extensive experience as a public company director.
Kate Vanek has been nominated for election to the Board pursuant to the Second Cooperation Agreement. Since 2022, Ms. Vanek has served as both Chief Operating Officer, EMEA and APAC, and global Chief Financial Officer of True Talent Advisory, a data-driven and technology-focused talent management company addressing the talent needs of both private and public companies. From 2018 to 2022, Ms. Vanek served as the Chief Operating Officer of the global finance organization and, during the latter three years, Chief Financial Officer of the EMEA division of, Blackrock, Inc., a global investment company. From 2016 to 2018, Ms. Vanek was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Global Media Business, of Nielsen, and prior to being promoted to that role she served as Nielsen’s Senior Vice President of Investor Relations. From
8


2018 to 2013, Ms. Vanek served in various investor relations and government relations-related roles with Stanley Black and Decker, a worldwide leader in tools and outdoor operating manufacturing facilities. Prior to 2008, Ms. Vanek worked for the financial firm Bear Stearns & Co., as Vice President of Credit Derivative Sales, and also as a manager at Thomson Financial. Ms. Vanek earned a B.A. degree from the University of Richmond and an M.B.A. from the Columbia Business School. We have determined that Ms. Vanek is qualified to serve as a member of our Board because of her successor, orsubstantial leadership and finance-related skills as well as her significant subject-matter experience relating to data acquisition and management, media delivery and measurement, international business operations, public company investor relations, and human capital/DEI initiatives.
Michael Wargotz has served on our Board since February 2023. Mr. Wargotz currently serves as a member of the board of directors of Travel + Leisure Co., a publicly traded membership and leisure travel company. From 2011 to 2017, Mr. Wargotz served as Chairman of Axcess Ventures, an affiliate of Axcess Worldwide, a brand experience marketing development agency. From 2010 to 2011, he co-founded and served as Chief Financial Officer of The Milestone Aviation Group, a global aviation leasing company, from 2010 to 2011. Mr. Wargotz served as the Co-Chairman of Axcess Luxury and Lifestyle from August 2009 to July 2010. From 2006 to 2009, he served as the Chief Financial Advisor of NetJets, Inc., a leading provider of private aviation services from 2006 to 2009 and Vice President of NetJets from 2004 to 2006. Mr. Wargotz co-founded and was a partner in Axcess Worldwide from 2001 to 2004. From January 1998 to December 1999, Mr. Wargotz served in various leadership positions at Cendant Corporation, including President and Chief Executive Officer of its Lifestyle Division, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of its Alliance Marketing Segment, and Senior Vice President, Business Development. Prior to 1998, Mr. Wargotz served in various finance and accounting positions at HFS Incorporated, PaineWebber & Co, America Express and Price Waterhouse. Mr. Wargotz received a B.A. in Accounting from Rutgers University and an M.B.A. from New York University. We have determined that Mr. Wargotz is qualified to serve as a member of our Board because of his or her earlier death, resignation or removal. substantial leadership, business development, branding and governance experience, as well as significant finance-related skills and expertise including audit oversight, financial reporting and compliance gained from over 30 years of relevant experience.
Our Board of Directors. The initial classnominees who are currently members of eachour Board, the director who is set forth inserving for a term that ends following the table below.
The nomineesAnnual Meeting, the directors who are not standing for re-election, and the directors who are serving for terms that end followingresigning from the Board effective as of the Annual Meeting, and their ages, occupations and length of board service as of April 22, 2021,June 30, 2023, are provided in the table below. Additional biographical descriptions of each nominee and directorof our current directors are set forth in the text below the table.table (apart from the biographies of Messrs. Krepsik, McDonald, Reece and Wargotz, whose biographies are provided above). These descriptions include the primary individual experience, qualifications, qualities and skills of our nominees and directors that led to the conclusion that each person should serve as a member of our Board.
NomineesIndependent?ClassAgePositionDirector
Since
Current
Term
Expires
Expiration of
Term For
Which
Nominated
Steve HorowitzI53Director201520212024
Christy WyattI49Director201820212024
Continuing Directors
Steven BoalII55Chairman of Board and CEO19982022
Robert McDonaldII67Director20182022
Michelle McKennaII55Director20172022
Andrew GessowIII63Director20132023
David OppenheimerIII64Director20172023
Lorraine HaritonIII66Director20212023
9


Nominees
Independent?ClassAgePositionDirector
Since
Current
Term
Expires
Expiration of
Term For
Which
Nominated
Board-Nominated Director Nominees Who Are Current Members of the Board
Matthew KrepsikII41CEO202220232024
Robert McDonaldII70Director - Chair201820232024
Joseph Reece*II61Director202220232024
Michael Wargotz*II64Director202320232024
Continuing Director
Kimberly AnstettI50Director20222024N/A
Directors Not Standing for Re-Election or Who Are Resigning Effective as of the Annual Meeting**
Andrew GessowII66Director20132023N/A
Lorraine HaritonII68Director20212023N/A
Alison HawkinsI57Director20212024N/A
Eric D. HiggsI52Director20222024N/A
David OppenheimerII66Director20172023N/A
Until the election of directors at the Annual Meeting, the Board is divided into two classes of directors, Class I and Class II, with the directors in Class II having a term that expires at the Annual Meeting and the directors in Class I having a term expiring at the 2024 Annual Meeting. As of the election of directors at this Annual Meeting, the directors so elected will join those directors already serving in Class I as of the Annual Meeting to create single class of directors, denominated as Class I, having a term that expires at the 2024 Annual Meeting.
*Appointed pursuant to the First Cooperation Agreement.
**The terms of Mr. Gessow, Ms. Hariton, and Mr. Oppenheimer expire as of the Annual Meeting, and none will be standing for re-election to the Board. Each of Ms. Hawkins and Mr. Higgs has announced her and his respective resignations from the Board effective as of the Annual Meeting.
Continuing Director
Steve HorowitzKimberly Anstett has served on our Board since June 2015. Mr. Horowitz2022. Ms. Anstett is currently a partner at Alpha Edison, a venture capital firm. Mr. Horowitzan accomplished technology executive with more than 25 years of experience scaling businesses through strategy execution and transformation. Since September 2022, Ms. Anstett has served as Vice PresidentChief Information Officer of Technology at Snap Inc. (“Snap”),Trellix, a public camera company, from September 2017 until March 2019 and previously as Vice President of Hardware with Snap from January 2015 until September 2017. Beforeglobal cybersecurity company. Prior to joining Snap, Mr. HorowitzTrellix, Ms. Anstett served as Seniorthe Executive Vice President of Software Engineering at Motorola Mobility, LLC, a public mobile communications company, formerly a Google company, from December 2012 through January 2015. From January 2009 through November 2012, Mr. Horowitz served as our Chief Technology Officer. Prior to that he worked at Google, Microsoft and Apple. Mr. Horowitz holds a B.A. degree from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. We have determined that Mr. Horowitz is qualified to serve as a member of our Board because of his significant industry experience and company experience.







10


Christy Wyatt has served on our Board since July 2018. Ms. Wyatt currently serves as the President and Chief ExecutiveTechnology Officer at Absolute Software Corporation,of Iron Mountain Inc., a Canadian publicpublicly traded company that specializes in endpoint security and data riskis an enterprise information management solutions, which she joined in November 2018. Ms. Wyatt served as President and Chief Executive Officer at Dtex Systems, Inc. (“Dtex”), a privateservices company, from May 2019 to August 2016 until November 2018.2022, where she led its product engineering and enterprise technology digital transformation. Prior to joining Dtex,Iron Mountain, from May 2014 to April 2019, Ms. WyattAnstett served as Chairman, Presidentthe Chief Information Officer for Nielsen, a publicly traded company that is a world renowned marketing and Chief Executive Officerconsumer intelligence enterprise that provides critical research, data and strategic insights about consumer behavior. At Nielsen, she led cyber security programs focused on securing end-to-end business operations and protecting enterprise and customer data. She also designed and led strategic partnership programs with many of Good Corporationthe largest global partners at Nielsen. Ms. Anstett received a B.S. in Science, Electrical Engineering from January 2013 until October 2015. Prior to Good, Ms. Wyatt has held leadership positions across both consumer and enterprise at Citigroup, Motorola Mobility, Apple Inc., Palm, Inc. and Sun Microsystems, Inc. Ms. Wyatt currently serves on the board of directors of Absolute Software Corporation since December 2018, and Silicon Labs since January 2019, a public company and leading provider of silicon, software, and solutions. Ms. Wyatt served on the board of directors of Dtex from November 2018 to May 2019. Ms. Wyatt graduated from the College of Geographic Sciences.Tufts University. We have determined that Ms. WyattAnstett is qualified to serve as a member of our Board because of her industryleadership in the technology sector, experience leading cyber security programs and extensive experience in managingwith M&A transactions and evaluating companiespost-acquisition integrations.
Directors Not Standing for Re-Election or Who Are Resigning Effective as an executive officer and as a board member. For more information please see “Corporate Governance and Directors - Director Commitments.” 
Continuing Directors
Steven Boal founded Quotient in 1998. Mr. Boal has served as our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our Board since August 2019 and has been a member of the Board since 1998. Mr. Boal was our Executive Chairman from September 2017 to August 2019, our CEO from 1998 until September 2017, our Chairman from February 2017 until September 2017, and our President from 1998 until September 2015. Prior to founding Quotient, Mr. Boal served as Vice President of Business Development for Integral Development Corporation, a privately held financial software company. Mr. Boal holds a B.A. from the State University of New York at Albany. We have determined that Mr. Boal’s perspective, operational and historical expertise gained from his experience as our founder, Chief Executive Officer, former President and one of our largest stockholders, make him a critical member of our Board.2023 Annual Meeting
Andrew "Jody" Gessow has served on our Board since May 2013. Mr. Gessow currently serves as a managing partner at DivCore Equity Partners, a real estate investment firm, and as senior advisor atDivco West Real Estate Services (“Divco”). From May 2007 through December 2011, Mr. Gessow was the West Coast Partner and Managing Director of One Equity Partners LLC, the private equity platform of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. Since January 2020, Mr. Gessow has served on the board of directors of Waterfall Security Solutions, an Israeli
10


private industrial cybersecurity company, since January 2020.company. Previously, Mr. Gessow served as a member of the board of directors of Mandiant Corporation and the TV Guide Network. Mr. Gessow holds a B.B.A. in Business Administration from Emory University and an M.B.A. from Harvard University. We have determined that Mr. Gessow is qualified to serve as a member of our Board because of his experience in both managing and evaluating companies as an executive officer, board member and investor.
Lorraine Hariton has served on our Board since January 2021. Ms. Hariton currently serves as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Catalyst, a global nonprofit that provides leadership tosupported by many of the world’s most powerful CEOs and leading companies to help build workplaces that work for women. Prior to joining Catalyst, Ms. Hariton worked independently as a consultant from 2014 until August 2018. Previously, Ms. Hariton spent 25 years in various senior-level positions in Silicon Valley, including CEO of two venture-backed start-ups, before being appointed by President Obama in 2009 as Special Representative for Commercial and Business Affairs at the USU.S. Department of State in 2009.State. More recently, she served as SVP for Global Partnerships for the New York Academy of Sciences where she was instrumental in establishing the Global STEM Alliance. From March 2014 to February 2016, Ms. Hariton served on the board of directors of Wave Systems Corporation, a publicly traded data security company, where she was chair of the nominating and governance committee. She also served on the California Board of Accountancy; the Entrepreneurs Foundation, and the Stanford Clayman Institute for Gender Research, amongst others. Ms. Hariton earned an MBAa M.B.A. from Harvard University, and BSa B.S. from Stanford University. We have determined that Ms. Hariton is qualified to serve as a member of our Board because of her experience in the technology industry, her executive management experience, her public company experience, and her diversity, equity and inclusion ("DEI") expertise.



11


Robert McDonald Alison Hawkinshas served on our Board since November 2018. Mr. McDonaldJuly 2021. Ms. Hawkins currently serves on boards of various companies and organizations,as a Senior Advisor at Artemis Real Estate Partners ("Artemis"), a women-owned real estate private and public, non-profit and for-profit. Mr. McDonaldequity firm where she served as Managing Principal from 2015 to 2021. Ms. Hawkins was initially hired to lead the U.S. Secretaryfirm's capital raise strategy shortly after Artemis' founding in 2009 and remained in that role until 2013. From 2013 to 2015, Ms. Hawkins was employed by CBRE Global Investors, where as a managing director she held a senior capital-raising and strategic product development role for one of Veterans Affairsthe largest global real estate firms. From 2004 to 2010, Ms. Hawkins served initially as an associate and later as director at Eastdil Secured, a national real estate investment bank, where she advised clients on investment sales and capital markets strategies. From 1999-2000, Ms. Hawkins was general counsel of Kibu, Inc., a venture-backed internet marketing company, and from July 2014 until January 2017.1990-1999 Ms. Hawkins served initially as an associate attorney and later as a partner with Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP, a class action litigation firm. A graduate of Occidental College (A.B.), American University (J.D.), and the Wharton School (M.B.A.). Ms. Hawkins holds the Chartered Alternative Investments Analyst designation and is a member of the State Bar of California. She is a member of the Occidental College Board of Trustees, where she serves on the board’s audit and investment committees, and has served as Treasurer of Inspired Educ8ion, since June 2022. We have determined that Ms. Hawkins is qualified to serve on the Board because of her executive experience, her financial skills relating to company operations, investment evaluation and capital raising, her legal practice and risk management experience, and her DEI oversight experience.
Eric D. Higgs has served on our Board since March 2022. Mr. McDonald was Chairman,Higgs has more than two decades of leadership experience overseeing marketing strategy development and product execution in the consumer goods and retail industry. Since June 2020, Mr. Higgs has served as the Chief Executive Officer of the Boys & Girls Clubs of Middle Tennessee, where he leads the organization’s strategic direction, oversight of organizational operations, financials, programming, brand reputation and talent recruitment. Prior to his role at the Boys & Girls Clubs of Middle Tennessee, Mr. Higgs served in a number of roles with increasing responsibility at Bridgestone Americas from May 2016 to March 2020. He served as Senior Vice President, Marketing Operations (April 2020 to May 2020, where he was responsible for helping shape the future of Bridgestone Americas’ tire and solutions business and creating synergies between the marketing and sales organizations. Prior to this, he served as President of Bridgestone Americas’ Commercial Truck and Retread business (September 2018 to March 2020). Prior to joining Bridgestone, he spent approximately four years at Kimberly Clark from 2012 to 2016, during which he drove sales growth in two of its key businesses. Mr. Higgs also spent over 18 years at Procter & Gamble, Companya public company, from January 2010 until June 2013.1994 to 2012 leading marketing efforts and product launches for a number of business lines. Mr. McDonald joined Procter & GambleHiggs holds a B.S. in 1980 and served in various positions for that company. He was named Procter & Gamble’s Vice Chairman, Global Operations in 2004; Chief Operating Officer in 2007; President and Chief Executive Officer in 2009; and Chairman of the Board in 2010. From 2005 to July 2014 Mr. McDonald served on the board of directors of Xerox Corporation, a provider of document management solutions, and from January 2014 to July 2014, Mr. McDonald served on the board of directors of United States Steel Corporation, an integrated steel producer, both public companies. Mr. McDonald graduated from the United States Military Academy at West Point in 1975. He earned his M.B.A.Chemical Engineering from the University of Utah in 1978.Illinois and an M.B.A. from the Fuqua School of Business at Duke University. We have determined that Mr. McDonaldHiggs is qualified to serve as a member of our Board because he brings decades of leadership experience in the consumer goods and retail industry, his deep industry experience, public company experience, executive leadership expertisesuccessful track record of building and growing brands through traditional and digital outlets and in driving improved sales and profitability, and his extensive sales and marketing knowledge of operational matters.
Michelle McKenna has served on our Board since October 2017. Ms. McKennais currentlyas bringing value to the Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer of the National Football League (the “NFL”), which she joined in September 2012. PriorCompany’s efforts to joining the NFL, Ms. McKenna served as Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer at Constellation Energy Group, Inc., an energy company. Ms. McKenna has served on the board of directors of RingCentral, Inc., a public global enterprise cloud communications and collaboration company, since March 2015 and Alticor, a private parent company of Amway, one of the world’s leading direct selling companies, since February 2020.Ms. McKenna served on the board of directors of Insperity, a human resourcesenhance its product portfolio and business solutions company, from April 2015 until August 2017and comScore, Inc., a global information and analytics company, from October 2017 until March 2019, both public companies. Ms. McKenna holds a B.S. in Accounting from Auburn University and a M.B.A. from Rollins College. Ms. McKenna was formerly licensed as a certified public accountant in the State of Georgia. We have determined that Ms. McKenna is qualified to serve as a member of our Board because of her experience serving on the board of directors of public companies and expertise in financial accounting and risk management.operations.
David Oppenheimer has served on our Board since July 2017. Mr. Oppenheimer is currently a President of Oppenheimer Advisors and General Partner of Verissimo Ventures. Mr. Oppenheimer served as the Chief
11


Financial Officer at Udemy, Inc., a public company that is a global marketplace for learning and teaching online, from AugustJuly 2018 through JanuaryFebruary 2019. Previously Mr. Oppenheimer was Chief Financial Officer at Planet Labs Inc., a public space and analytics company, having served in that role from October 2015 through August 2018. From April 2013 through February 2015, Mr. Oppenheimer served as Chief Financial Officer at Ebates Inc. (acquired by Rakuten, Inc.), an e-commerce company. Since April 2020, Mr. Oppenheimer currently serveshas served on the board of directors of Lumus Ltd, an Israeli private augmented reality technology company, since April 2020.company. Additionally, Mr. Oppenheimer served on the board of directors and audit committee of HotChalk, Inc., a Delaware private education software company, from May 2015 until December 2020, and The Olympic Club, a private company, from January 2018 until December 2020. Mr. Oppenheimer holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the State University of New York at Buffalo and aan M.B.A. from the University of California, Berkeley. We have determined that Mr. Oppenheimer is qualified to serve asserveas a member of our Board because of his experience serving on audit committees and expertise in financial accounting at technology companies.

Board Snapshot
1572715728
1573015731
Note: Data in charts above represents the Board of Directors immediately after the 2023 Annual Meeting, assuming all of the Company’s nominees are elected by stockholders.
Director Skills and Experience
Each of our directors brings to our Board a wealth of experience derived from serving as executives, investors, board members and other leaders in their respective fields. Our Board has worked to ensure that there are diverse perspectives, backgrounds and skill sets in the boardroom, which we believe enhances our oversight of the Company’s strategy.
The Board has determined the following attributes to be among the most relevant when considering the suitability of director candidates:
12


Other Public Board Experience
Experience with leadership and management on a public company board
Ability to provide corporate governance expertise or experience from other corporate boards to enhance the Board’s oversight and ensure that the Board is fulfilling its fiduciary obligations to stockholders
Executive Management Experience
Ability to lead, manage and motivate large teams
Established track record of accomplishment in the candidate’s chosen field
Experience dealing with a range of stakeholders and managing the challenges associated with operating a large organization
Internet / Technology / Software Industry Experience
Ability to oversee the Company’s product development strategy and provide insights to the management team as it seeks to enhance the user experience and expand the Company’s platform capabilities
Digital Marketing / Media / Brand Advertising Experience
Understanding of marketing channels and the ability to expand our network and platform capabilities to benefit our customers and partners
Finance / Accounting Experience
Ability to apply financial literacy and an understanding of finance and accounting to identify the best and most efficient options for raising and allocating capital, and for maintaining the appropriate capital structure
Ability to apply knowledge of financial and accounting principles to oversee the Company’s financial reporting and internal controls
Operations / Strategy / Business Transformation
Ability to anticipate, identify and assess key strategic risks and opportunities for the Company
Ability to provide guidance to the management team with respect to long-term strategic planning
Experience developing, implementing, directing and overseeing corporate strategy, with a focus on transforming organizations and improving culture, processes, services and products
Retail / Consumer Packaged Goods
Knowledge and understanding of the Company’s core customer and partner base and their specific needs with respect to driving sales and increasing brand engagement with shoppers
Human Capital Management / Compensation
Understanding of executive compensation issues, succession planning, talent management and development
Environmental / Social Responsibility
Understanding of environmental, social and governance issues and experience with the development and implementation of policies relating to such issues
Technology / Systems / Cybersecurity
Experience developing technology and software solutions with a focus on data security
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has determined that each of the individuals the Company has nominated for election are qualified to serve as directors of the Company. In making this determination, the Committee noted that the nominees bring relevant skills, backgrounds and experiences that enable the Board to effectively oversee the Company’s business. The primary skills and experiences of the directors, including those not up for election this year, are set forth below:
13


Board of Directors
NomineesContinuing Director
Tracey FigurelliMatthew KrepsikRobert McDonaldJoseph ReeceKate VanekMichael WargotzKimberly Anstett
Knowledge, Skills & Experience
Other Public Board Experience
Executive Management Experience
Internet / Technology / Software Industry Experience
Digital Marketing / Media / Brand Advertising Experience
Finance / Accounting Experience
Operations / Strategy / Business Transformation
Retail / Consumer Packaged Goods
Human Capital Management / Compensation
Environmental / Social Responsibility
Technology / Systems / Cybersecurity
Board Tenure
Years01410<11
Age
Years51417061446450
Note: Data in charts above represents the Board of Directors immediately after the 2023 Annual Meeting, assuming all of the Company’s nominees are elected by stockholders.
Vote Required
The election of directors will be determined by a plurality of the votes cast by the stockholders present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote thereon. Only votes “FOR” will affect the outcome. Withhold votes and any broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of the vote on the election of a director.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR ALL THE COMPANY'S NOMINEES - TRACEY FIGURELLI, MATTHEW KREPSIK, ROBERT MCDONALD, JOSEPH REECE, KATE VANEK, AND MICHAEL WARGOTZ.
14


PROPOSAL NO. 2
APPROVAL OF 2023 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
On June 19, 2023, the Board approved the Quotient Technology Inc. 2023 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2023 Plan”), subject to approval by our stockholders. The 2023 Plan will replace the Quotient Technology Inc. 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2013 Plan”). If the 2023 Plan is approved, no new awards will be granted under the 2013 Plan after the 2023 Plan becomes effective. As of June 23, 2023, there were 11,135,962 shares of common stock that remained available for future issuance under the 2013 Plan (assuming outstanding performance awards are counted at the maximum vesting level), and which will terminate and cease to be available for future grants under the 2013 Plan if the 2023 Plan is approved by our stockholders.
If, and as of the time that, the Proposed Acquisition is consummated, the 2023 Plan will terminate. If the 2023 Plan is approved, the making of awards pursuant to the 2023 Plan will be subject to the provisions of the Merger Agreement, as will the treatment, upon consummation of the Proposed Acquisition, of any awards made pursuant to the 2023 Plan.
If the 2023 Plan is approved by stockholders, we will continue to be able to make awards of long-term equity incentives, which we believe are critical for attracting, motivating, rewarding and retaining a talented team who will contribute to our success. If the 2023 Plan is not adopted by our stockholders, the Company will continue to operate the 2013 Plan in accordance with its current terms until the 2013 Plan expires on October 22, 2023, and after thatwe may be required to increase the cash component of our compensation mix. This would inhibit our ability to align our executives’ interests with the interests of our stockholders, to recruit and retain new executives, key employees and non-employee directors, and motivate our current executives and key employees over a long-term horizon.
Equity Grant Practices
Outstanding Equity Awards
As of June 23, 2023, there were approximately 8,439,098 full value awards (that is, awards other than stock options and stock appreciation rights, and with performance-based awards counted assuming the maximum vesting level) issued and outstanding and approximately 7,284,230 stock options outstanding under the 2013 Plan. As of that date, the weighted average exercise price of our outstanding stock options was $6.66, and the weighted average remaining contractual term for the outstanding stock options was 3.07 years. As noted above, as of June 23, 2023, 11,135,962 shares of common stock remained available for issuance under the 2013 Plan.
Dilution
Annual dilution from our equity compensation program is measured as the total number of shares subject to equity awards granted in a given year, less cancellations and other shares returned to the reserve that year, divided by total shares outstanding at the end of the year. Annual dilution from our equity compensation program for fiscal year 2022 was 3.7%. Overhang is another measure of the dilutive impact of equity programs. Our overhang is equal to the number of shares subject to outstanding equity compensation awards plus the number of shares available to be granted, divided by the total number of outstanding shares. As of June 23, 2023, our overhang was 27.2%.Overhang percentages are based on approximately 98,666,903 shares of common stock outstanding as of June 23, 2023.
Burn Rate
Burn rate is a measure of the number of shares subject to equity awards that we grant annually, which helps indicate the life expectancy of our equity plans and is another measure of stockholder dilution. We determine our burn rate by dividing the aggregate number of shares subject to awards granted and performance shares units earned during the year by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year. The Company’s burn rate for the past three fiscal years has been as follows:
15


Full Value Awards
YearOptions GrantedStock Units GrantedPerformance Share Units Granted
Performance Share Units Earned(1)
Options + Full Value AwardsWeighted Average Number of Ordinary Shares OutstandingBurn Rate
20221,125,0007,239,0551,641,877563,0178,927,07295,868,5809.3%
20213,970,8021,108,83132,6094,003,41193,686,3884.3%
20201,150,1783,340,532147,52481,2574,571,96790,411,5145.1%
(1)Performance awards are shown based on the number earned.
Our three-year average Burn Rate is 6.2%.
Certain Features of the 2023 Plan
The following features of the 2023 Plan are designed to reinforce alignment between the equity compensation arrangements awarded pursuant to the 2023 Plan and our stockholders’ interests:
No evergreen provision;
No discounting of stock options or stock appreciation rights;
No repricing or replacement of underwater stock options or stock appreciation rights granted under either the 2023 Plan or the 2013 Plan without stockholder approval;
No dividend equivalents on stock options or stock appreciation rights;
No dividends or dividend equivalents paid on unearned equity or restricted stock awards;
Prohibition of the recycling of shares used to pay the exercise price or taxes related to an award;
Annual non-employee director compensation limit, which cannot be amended without stockholder approval; and
No liberal definition of “change in control.”
Purposes of the 2023 Plan
Equity-based compensation is a significant component of our compensation program and the 2023 Plan is intended to serve the following purposes:
Align the interests of the Company’s stockholders and recipients of awards under the 2023 Plan by increasing the proprietary interest of such recipients in the Company’s growth and success;
Advance the interests of the Company by attracting and retaining officers, other employees, non-employee directors, consultants, and independent contractors; and
Motivate such persons to act in the long-term best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
Under the 2023 Plan, the Company may grant:
Non-qualified stock options;
Incentive stock options (within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code);
Stock appreciation rights (“SARs”);
Restricted stock, restricted stock units and other stock awards (collectively, “Stock Awards”); and
Performance Awards.
Description of the 2023 Plan
The following description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the plan document, a copy of which is attached as Appendix A and incorporated into this Proxy Statement by reference.
Administration
The 2023 Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board, or a subcommittee thereof, or such other committee designated by the Board (the “Plan Committee”), in each case consisting of two or more members of the Board. Each member of the Plan Committee is intended to be (i) a “non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), as amended and (ii) “independent” within the meaning of the rules of the New York Stock Exchange.
Subject to the express provisions of the 2023 Plan, the Plan Committee has the authority to select eligible persons to receive awards and determine all of the terms and conditions of each award. All awards are evidenced by an agreement containing such provisions not inconsistent with the 2023 Plan as the Plan Committee approves. The Plan Committee also has authority to establish rules and regulations for administering
16


the 2023 Plan and to decide questions of interpretation or application of any provision of the 2023 Plan. The Plan Committee may take any action such that (1) any outstanding options and SARs become exercisable in part or in full, (2) all or any portion of a restriction period on any outstanding Stock Awards lapse, (3) all or a portion of any performance period applicable to any outstanding awards lapse, and (4) any performance measures applicable to any outstanding award be deemed satisfied at the target, maximum or any other level.
The Plan Committee may delegate some or all of its power and authority under the 2023 Plan to the Board, a subcommittee of the Board, a member of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer or other executive officer of the Company as the Plan Committee deems appropriate, except that it may not delegate its power and authority to a member of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer or any executive officer with regard to awards to persons subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
Available Shares
Under the 2023 Plan, the number of shares of common stock initially be available for all awards, other than substitute awards granted in connection with a corporate transaction, will be equal to the number of shares of common stock that are available for awards under the 2013 Plan immediately prior to the effective date of the 2023 Plan. On the record date of June 23, 2023, 11,135,962 shares of our common stock were available for future grant under the 2013 Plan. This amount is subject to adjustment in the event of any equity restructuring that causes the per share value of shares of common stock to change, such as a stock dividend, stock split, spinoff, rights offering or recapitalization through an extraordinary cash dividend. To the extent the Company grants an award under the Plan, the number of available shares will be reduced by an amount equal to the maximum number of shares subject to an award. On the record date of June 23, 2023, the closing sales price per share of our common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange was $3.88.
To the extent that shares of common stock subject to an outstanding award granted under the 2023 Plan or the 2013 Plan are not issued or delivered by reason of (i) the expiration, termination, cancellation or forfeiture of such award (excluding shares of common stock subject to an option canceled upon settlement of a related tandem SAR or subject to a tandem SAR cancelled upon exercise of a related option) or (ii) the settlement of such award in cash, then such shares of common stock will again be available under the 2023 Plan. Shares of common stock subject to an award under the 2013 Plan or the 2023 Plan will not again be available for issuance under the 2023 Plan if such shares are (i) shares that were subject to an option or stock-settled SAR and were not issued or delivered upon the net settlement or net exercise of such option or SAR (ii) shares delivered to or withheld by the Company to pay the purchase price or the withholding taxes related to an outstanding award or (iii) shares repurchased by the Company on the open market with the proceeds of an option exercise.
Change in Control
Unless otherwise provided in an award agreement, in the event of a change in control of the Company, the Board (as constituted prior to such change in control) may, in its discretion, provide that (i) some or all outstanding options and SARs will become exercisable in full or in part, either immediately or upon a subsequent termination of service, (ii) the restriction period applicable to some or all outstanding Stock Awards will lapse in full or in part, either immediately or upon a subsequent termination of service, (iii) the performance period applicable to some or all outstanding awards will lapse in full or in part, and (iv) the performance measures applicable to some or all outstanding awards will be deemed satisfied at the target, maximum or any other level. In addition, in the event of a change in control, the Board may, in its discretion, require that shares of capital stock of the company resulting from or succeeding to the business of the Company pursuant to such change in control, or the parent thereof, be substituted for some or all of the shares of Company common stock subject to outstanding awards as determined by the Board, and/or require outstanding awards, in whole or in part, to be surrendered to the Company in exchange for a payment of cash, other property, shares of capital stock in the company resulting from the change in control, or the parent thereof, or a combination of cash, other property and shares.
Under the terms of the 2023 Plan, a change in control is generally defined as (i) certain acquisitions of Company securities representing 50% or more of the total fair market value or total combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities, (ii) certain ownership change events in which the stockholders of the Company immediately before the event do not, immediately after the event, retain ownership of more than 50% of the Company or, in certain cases, the entity to which the assets of the Company are transferred, and (iii) a date specified by the Plan Committee following approval by the stockholders of a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company; provided that a change in control will not be deemed to include a
17


transaction described in clauses (i) or (ii) of this paragraph in which a majority of the members of the board of directors of the continuing, survivor or successor entity, or parent thereof, immediately after such transaction is comprised of the Company’s incumbent directors.
No Repricing
The Plan Committee may not, without the approval of stockholders, (i) reduce the purchase price or base price of any previously granted stock option or SAR, (ii) cancel any previously granted stock option or SAR in exchange for another stock option or SAR with a lower purchase price or base price or (iii) cancel any previously granted stock option or SAR in exchange for cash or another award if the purchase price of such stock option or the base price of such SAR exceeds the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of such cancellation, in each case, other than in connection with a change in control or pursuant to the plan’s adjustment provisions. This provision applies both to awards issued under the 2023 Plan and under the 2013 Plan.
Clawback of Awards
The awards granted under the 2023 Plan and any cash payment or shares of common stock delivered pursuant to an award are subject to forfeiture, recovery by the Company or other action pursuant to the applicable award agreement or any clawback or recoupment policy which the Company may adopt from time to time, including any such policy which the Company may be required to adopt under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and implementing rules and regulations thereunder, or as otherwise required by law.
Effective Date, Termination and Amendment
The 2023 Plan will become effective as of the date of stockholder approval and will terminate as of the first annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders to occur on or after the tenth anniversary of the date of such stockholder approval, unless earlier terminated by the Board. The Board may amend the 2023 Plan at any time, subject to any requirement of stockholder approval required by applicable law, rule or regulation, including any rule of the New York Stock Exchange, and provided that no amendment may be made that seeks to modify the non-employee director compensation limit or the prohibition on repricing of stock options and SARs without stockholder approval. No amendment may materially impair the rights of a holder of an outstanding award without the consent of such holder. Awards may be granted at any time prior to the termination of the 2023 Plan, provided that no incentive stock option may be granted later than 10 years after the date on which the 2023 Plan was approved by the Board.
Eligibility
Participants in the 2023 Plan will consist of such officers, other employees, non-employee directors, consultants, and independent contractors of the Company and its subsidiaries (and such persons who are expected to become any of the foregoing) as selected by the Plan Committee. As of June 23, 2023, approximately 898 employees and 9 non-employee directors would be eligible to participate in the 2023 Plan.
Non-Employee Director Compensation Limit
Under the terms of the 2023 Plan, the aggregate value of cash compensation and the grant date fair value of shares of common stock that may be awarded or granted during any fiscal year of the Company to any non-employee director will not exceed $750,000 or, in the first year in which a non-employee director is elected or appointed to the Board, $1,000,000.
Stock Options and SARs
The 2023 Plan provides for the grant of stock options and SARs. The Plan Committee will determine the conditions to the exercisability of each option and SAR.
Each option will be exercisable for no more than ten (10) years after its date of grant. If the option is an incentive stock option and the optionee owns greater than ten percent (10%) of the voting power of all shares of capital stock of the Company (a “ten percent holder”), then the option will be exercisable for no more than five years after its date of grant. Except in the case of substitute awards granted in connection with a corporate transaction, the exercise price of an option will not be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of grant, unless the option is an incentive stock option and the optionee is a ten percent holder, in which case the exercise price will be the price required by the Internal Revenue Code.
18


Each SAR will be exercisable for no more than ten (10) years after its date of grant. Other than in the case of substitute awards granted in connection with a corporate transaction, the base price of a SAR will not be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of grant, provided that the base price of a SAR granted in tandem with an option (a “tandem SAR”) will be the exercise price of the related option. A SAR entitles the holder to receive upon exercise (subject to withholding taxes) shares of common stock (which may be restricted stock) or, to the extent provided in the award agreement, cash or a combination thereof, with an aggregate value equal to the difference between the fair market value of the shares of common stock on the exercise date and the base price of the SAR.
All of the terms relating to the exercise, cancellation or other disposition of stock options and SARs (i) upon a termination of service of a participant, whether by reason of disability, retirement, death or any other reason, or (ii) during a paid or unpaid leave of absence, are determined by the Plan Committee.
Notwithstanding anything in the award agreement to the contrary, the holder of an option or SAR will not be entitled to receive dividend equivalents with respect to the shares of common stock subject to such option or SAR.
Stock Awards
The 2023 Plan provides for the grant of Stock Awards. The Plan Committee may grant a Stock Award as a restricted stock award, restricted stock unit award or other stock award. Restricted stock awards and restricted stock unit awards are subject to forfeiture if the holder does not remain continuously in the service of the Company during the restriction period or if specified performance measures (if any) are not attained during the performance period. Other stock awards may be subject to restriction periods or performance measures.
Unless otherwise set forth in a restricted stock award agreement, the holder of shares of restricted stock has rights as a stockholder of the Company, including the right to vote and receive dividends with respect to shares of restricted stock and to participate in any capital adjustments applicable to all holders of the Company’s common stock; provided, however, that a distribution or dividend paid with respect to shares of Company common stock, including a regular cash dividend, will be deposited by the Company and will be subject to the same restrictions as the shares of Company common stock with respect to which such distribution was made.
The agreement awarding restricted stock units will specify (1) whether such award may be settled in shares of common stock, cash or a combination thereof; and (2) whether the holder will be entitled to receive, on a current or deferred basis, dividend equivalents, and, if determined by the Plan Committee, interest on, or the deemed reinvestment of, any deferred dividend equivalents, with respect to the number of shares of common stock subject to such award. Any dividend equivalents credited with respect to restricted stock units that are subject to vesting conditions will be subject to the same vesting conditions that apply to the underlying awards. Prior to settlement of a restricted stock unit in shares of common stock, the holder of a restricted stock unit has no rights as a stockholder of the Company.
All of the terms relating to the satisfaction of performance measures and the termination of a restriction period or performance period relating to a Stock Award, or the forfeiture and cancellation of a Stock Award (i) upon a termination of service, whether by reason of disability, retirement, death or any other reason, or (ii) during a paid or unpaid leave of absence, will be determined by the Plan Committee.
Performance Awards
The 2023 Plan also provides for the grant of performance awards. The agreement relating to a performance award will specify whether such award may be settled in shares of common stock (including shares of restricted stock) or cash or a combination thereof. The agreement relating to a performance award will provide, in the manner determined by the Plan Committee, for the vesting of such performance award if the specified performance measures are satisfied or met during the specified performance period and for the forfeiture of such award if the specified performance measures are not satisfied or met during the specified performance period. Any dividends or dividend equivalents with respect to a performance award will be subject to the same vesting conditions that apply to the underlying awards. Prior to the settlement of a performance award in shares of common stock, the holder of such award has no rights as a stockholder of the Company with respect to such shares. All of the terms relating to the satisfaction of performance measures and the termination of a performance period, or the forfeiture and cancellation of a performance award upon (i) a termination of service, whether by reason of disability, retirement, death or any other reason, or (ii) during a paid or unpaid leave of absence, will be determined by the Plan Committee.
19


Performance Measures
Under the 2023 Plan, the grant, vesting, exercisability or payment of certain awards, or the receipt of shares of common stock subject to certain awards, may be made subject to the satisfaction of performance measures. The performance goals applicable to a particular award will be determined by the Plan Committee at the time of grant. Such performance criteria and objectives may include, without limitation, any one or more of the following business criteria for the Company, on a consolidated basis, and/or for specified subsidiaries, business or geographical units or operating areas of the Company (except with respect to the total shareholder return and earnings per share criteria) or on an individual basis: the attainment by a share of common stock of a specified fair market value for a specified period of time; increase in stockholder value; earnings per share; return on or net assets; return on equity; return on investments; return on capital or invested capital; total stockholder return; earnings or income of the Company before or after taxes and/or interest; earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”); EBITDA margin; operating income; revenues; operating expenses, attainment of expense levels or cost reduction goals; market share; cash flow, cash flow per share, cash flow margin or free cash flow; interest expense; economic value created; gross profit or margin; operating profit or margin; net cash provided by operations; price-to-earnings growth; and strategic business criteria, consisting of one or more objectives based on meeting specified goals relating to market penetration, customer acquisition, business expansion, cost targets, customer satisfaction, reductions in errors and omissions, reductions in lost business, management of employment practices and employee benefits, supervision of litigation, supervision of information technology, quality and quality audit scores, efficiency, and acquisitions or divestitures or such other goals as the Plan Committee may determine whether or not listed herein.
Each such goal may be expressed on a pre-tax or post-tax basis or on an absolute or relative basis and may include comparisons based on current internal targets, the past performance of the Company (including the performance of one or more subsidiaries, divisions, or operating units) or the past or current performance of other companies or market indices (or a combination of such past and current performance). In addition to the ratios specifically enumerated above, performance goals may include comparisons relating to capital (including, but not limited to, the cost of capital), shareholders’ equity, shares outstanding, assets or net assets, sales, or any combination thereof. In establishing a performance measure or determining the achievement of a performance measure, the Plan Committee may provide that achievement of the applicable performance measures may be amended or adjusted to include or exclude components of any performance measure, including, without limitation, foreign exchange gains and losses, asset write-downs, acquisitions and divestitures, change in fiscal year, unbudgeted capital expenditures, special charges such as restructuring or impairment charges, debt refinancing costs, extraordinary or noncash items, unusual, infrequently occurring, nonrecurring or one-time events affecting the Company or its financial statements or changes in law or accounting principles. Performance measures will be subject to such other special rules and conditions as the Plan Committee may establish at any time.
New Plan Benefits
The number of stock options or other forms of award that will be granted under the 2023 Plan is not currently determinable. Information regarding awards granted in 2022 under the 2013 Plan to the Named Executive Officers is provided in the “2022 Summary Compensation Table” and the “2022 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table, as set forth in the Company’s Form 10-K/A filed on April 28, 2023. Information regarding awards granted in 2022 under the 2013 Plan to non-employee directors is provided in the “2022 Director Compensation” table, also set forth in the Company’s Form 10-K/A filed on April 28, 2023.
Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following is a brief summary of certain United States federal income tax consequences generally arising with respect to awards under the 2023 Plan. This discussion does not address all aspects of the United States federal income tax consequences of participating in the 2023 Plan that may be relevant to participants in light of their personal investment or tax circumstances and does not discuss any state, local or non-United States tax consequences of participating in the 2023 Plan. Each participant is advised to consult his or her particular tax advisor concerning the application of the United States federal income tax laws to such participant’s particular situation, as well as the applicability and effect of any state, local or non-United States tax laws before taking any actions with respect to any awards.
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally limits to $1 million the amount that a publicly held corporation is allowed each year to deduct for the compensation paid to each of the corporation’s chief
20


executive officer, the corporation’s chief financial officer and certain other current and former executive officers of the corporation.
Stock Options
A participant will not recognize taxable income at the time an option is granted and the Company will not be entitled to a tax deduction at that time. A participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee) upon exercise of a non-qualified stock option equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares purchased over their exercise price, and the Company will be entitled to a corresponding deduction, subject to the deduction limits under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. A participant will not recognize income (except for purposes of the alternative minimum tax) upon exercise of an incentive stock option. If the shares acquired by exercise of an incentive stock option are held for the longer of two years from the date the option was granted and one year from the date it was exercised, any gain or loss arising from a subsequent disposition of those shares will be taxed as long-term capital gain or loss, and the Company will not be entitled to any deduction. If, however, those shares are disposed of within the above-described period, then in the year of that disposition the participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income equal to the excess of (1) the lesser of the amount realized upon that disposition and the fair market value of those shares on the date of exercise over (2) the exercise price, and the Company will be entitled to a corresponding deduction, subject to the deduction limits under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
SARs
A participant will not recognize taxable income at the time SARs are granted and the Company will not be entitled to a tax deduction at that time. Upon exercise, the participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee) in an amount equal to the fair market value of any shares delivered and the amount of cash paid by the Company, and the Company will be entitled to a corresponding deduction, subject to the deduction limits under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Stock Awards
A participant will not recognize taxable income at the time restricted stock is granted and the Company will not be entitled to a tax deduction at that time, unless the participant makes an election to be taxed at that time. If such election is made, the participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee) at the time of the grant in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value for the shares at such time over the amount, if any, paid for those shares. If such election is not made, the participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee) at the time the restrictions constituting a substantial risk of forfeiture lapse in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares at such time over the amount, if any, paid for those shares. The amount of ordinary income recognized by making the above-described election or upon the lapse of restrictions constituting a substantial risk of forfeiture is deductible by the Company as compensation expense, subject to the deduction limits under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. In addition, a participant receiving dividends with respect to restricted stock for which the above-described election has not been made and prior to the time the restrictions constituting a substantial risk of forfeiture lapse will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee), rather than dividend income, in an amount equal to the dividends paid and the Company will be entitled to a corresponding deduction, subject to the deduction limits under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
A participant will not recognize taxable income at the time a restricted stock unit is granted and the Company will not be entitled to a tax deduction at that time. Upon settlement of restricted stock units, the participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee) in an amount equal to the fair market value of any shares delivered and the amount of any cash paid by the Company, and the Company will be entitled to a corresponding deduction, subject to the deduction limits under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
A participant who receives shares of common stock that are not subject to any restrictions under the 2023 Plan will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income on the date of grant in an amount equal to the fair market value of such shares on that date, and the Company will be entitled to a corresponding deduction, subject to the deduction limits under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
21


Performance Awards
A participant will not recognize taxable income at the time performance awards are granted and the Company will not be entitled to a tax deduction at that time. Upon settlement of performance awards, the participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee) in an amount equal to the fair market value of any shares delivered and the amount of cash paid by the Company, and the Company will be entitled to a corresponding deduction, subject to the deduction limits under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACHTHE APPROVAL OF THE NOMINEESQUOTIENT TECHNOLOGY INC. 2023 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN.
NAMED ABOVE.

Equity Compensation Plan Information
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table includes information as of December 31, 2022 for equity compensation plans:
Plan CategoryNumber of
securities to be issued
upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
Number of securities
remaining available
For future
issuance under equity
compensation plans
Equity compensation plans
   approved by security holders
14,503,197(1)
6.61(2)
11,363,153(3)
Equity compensation plans
   not approved by security holders
n/an/an/a
Total14,503,19711,363,153
(1)Excludes purchase rights accruing under our 2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
(2)The weighted average exercise price relates solely to outstanding stock option shares since shares subject to RSUs have no exercise price.
(3)Includes 1,569,030 shares of common stock that remain available for purchase under the 2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 9,794,123 shares of common stock that remain available for purchase under our 2013 Plan. Additionally, our 2013 Plan provides for automatic increases in the number of shares available for issuance under it on the first day of each year starting on January 1, 2015 and each subsequent anniversary through 2023, by an amount equal to the smaller of (a) 4% of the number of shares of our common stock issued and outstanding on the immediately preceding December 31, or (b) an amount determined by the Board. Our 2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan provides for automatic increases in the number of shares available for issuance under it on the first day of each year starting on January 1, 2015 and each subsequent anniversary through 2023, equal to the smallest of (a) 400,000, (b) 0.5% of the number of shares of our common stock issued and outstanding on the immediately preceding December 31, or (c) an amount determined by the Board. The amounts in this table do not include the evergreen increase that was effective on January 1, 2023.

1222



PROPOSAL NO. 23
ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
At the 2019 Annual Meeting,annual meeting, our stockholders indicated their preference that we solicit a non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers, commonly referred to as a “say-on-pay” vote, every year. The Board has adopted a policy that is consistent with that preference. In accordance with that policy and as required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act, this year we are again asking our stockholders to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with SEC rules.
This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement. The compensation of our named executive officers subject to the vote is disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the related narrative disclosure contained in this proxy statement. As discussed in those disclosures, we believe that our compensation policies and decisions are focused on pay-for-performance principles, are responsive to recent stockholder feedback, and are strongly aligned with our stockholders’ interests so that we can attract and retain talented and experienced executives to lead the Company successfully in a competitive environment.
The overall objective of our executive compensation programs is to pay our executive officers competitively and equitably in a way that aligns our business and financial goals, and ties back to overall Company and individual performance. The primary objectives of our executive compensation programs are:
Pay-for-PerformanceA significant portion of pay for executive officers is at-risk and performance-based with metrics that align total compensation with the Company’s sustainable growth strategy and values, annual financial objectives, and performance of our stock price. At-risk compensation includes short-term cash incentives and long-term performance-based equity awards and long-term incentives in the form of equity awards.incentives.
Alignment with StockholdersOur compensation programs align executive officers’ interests with those of our stockholders, by providing equity-based forms of compensation and tying pay to Company and stock performance. We maintain stock ownership guidelines for all executive officers, and we remain committed to a culture of shared success through long-term equity awards. In response to stockholder feedback, we movedcontinued to award a portion of the 20212022 equity grant toin the form of performance-based RSUs to alignwith stringent vesting conditions. We believe the stock price vesting metrics are in alignment with stockholder interest.
Competitive AppealOur compensation programs’ goalsprograms are designed to attract, reward, and retain talented and highly qualified executive officers whose abilities and alignment to our values are critical to our success. We use market-based pay information to align each executive officer’s compensation to their position, responsibilities, and impact.
Drive FutureSustainable GrowthWe use our compensation programs to invest in and reward talent with the greatest potential to drive the long-term growth of our Company, while holding employees accountable to the Company’s strategy and values.
We set the compensation of our executive officers, including the named executive officers, by considering factors such as their ability to create sustainable long-term stockholder value in a cost-effective manner, prevailing market conditions, and compensation levels and practices of our peers. Our executive compensation philosophy is to align executive compensation decisions with our desired business direction, strategy, and performance.
Accordingly, the Board is asking the stockholders to indicate their support for the compensation of our named executive officers as described in this proxy statement by casting a non-binding advisory vote “FOR” the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.”

1323




Because the vote is advisory, it is not binding on the Board or the Company. Nevertheless, the views expressed by the stockholders, whether through this vote or otherwise, are important to management and the Board and, accordingly, the Board and the Compensation Committee intend to consider the results of this vote in making determinations in the future regarding executive compensation arrangements.
Advisory approval of this proposal requires the vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter at the annual meeting.Annual Meeting.
Vote Required
Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority in voting power of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter. Abstentions are considered votes present and entitled to vote on this proposal, and thus have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the proposal. Any broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE COMPENSATION
OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERSOFFICERS.
AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.


1424



PROPOSAL NO. 34
RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee of the Board (the “Audit Committee”) has appointed the firm of Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst & Young”) as our independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2021.2023. During our previous fiscal year ended December 31, 20202022 (“Fiscal 2020”2022”), Ernst & Young served as our independent registered public accounting firm.
At the Annual Meeting, the stockholders are being asked to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2021.2023. Our Audit Committee is submitting the selection of Ernst & Young to our stockholders because we value our stockholders’ views on our independent registered public accounting firm and as a matter of good corporate governance. Representatives of Ernst & Young will be present at the Annual Meeting and they will have an opportunity to make statements and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders. If this proposal does not receive the affirmative approval of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal, the Audit Committee would reconsider the appointment.
Notwithstanding its selection and even if our stockholders ratify the selection, our Audit Committee, in its discretion, may appoint another independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee believes that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
Fees Paid to the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The following table presents fees billed or to be billed by Ernst & Young for professional services rendered with respect to the years ended December 31, 20202022 and 2019.2021. All of these services rendered were preapproved by the Audit Committee.
2020 ($)2019 ($)2022 ($)2021($)
Audit Fees(1)
Audit Fees(1)
2,204,830 2,432,491 
Audit Fees(1)
3,164,010 2,973,590 
Audit-Related FeesAudit-Related Fees— 
297,400(2)
Audit-Related Fees— — 
Tax Fees(3)(2)
Tax Fees(3)(2)
— 70,200 
Tax Fees(3)(2)
— 7,336 
All Other Fees(3)
All Other Fees(3)
1,850 2,000 
TOTALTOTAL2,204,830 2,800,091 TOTAL3,165,860 2,982,926 
(1)Audit fees” consist of fees for professional services provided in connection with the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, the review of our quarterly consolidated financial statements, and audit services that are normally provided by our independent registered public accounting firm in connection with regulatory filings. The audit fees also include fees for professional services incurred with rendering an opinion under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(2)“Audit-related fees” include fees for professional services related to due-diligence services for the acquisition of Ubimo Ltd.
(3)“Tax fees” include fees for professional services related to tax advice. Tax advice fees encompass permissible services mainly related to technical tax advice related to federal, state and international tax compliance, acquisitions and international tax planning. 
(3)"All Other Fees" include subscription fee to Ernst & Young's accounting research tool.
Auditor Independence
Under its charter, the Audit Committee pre-approves all services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young. The Audit Committee has determined that the rendering of non-audit services by Ernst & Young was compatible with maintaining their independence.
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures.
Consistent with requirements of the SEC and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”) regarding auditor independence, our Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of our independent registered public accounting firm. In recognition of this responsibility, our Audit Committee (or a member of the Audit Committee delegated by the Audit Committee) pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services.
25


Vote Required
Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority in voting power of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter. Abstentions are considered votes present and entitled to vote on this proposal, and thus have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the proposal.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION
OF THE SELECTION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM.
1526



CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTORS
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, together with the Board’s committee charters, provide the framework for the corporate governance of the Company. Following is a summary of our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, as well as the charters of each of our Board committees, are available on our website at www.quotient.com on the Governance page under the Investors section.
Board Composition
Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our Board. Our Board currently consists of eightten members, sevennine of whom qualify as “independent” under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”).NYSE. The authorized number of directors may be changed only by resolution of our Board. The classificationAs of the close of the Annual Meeting, our Board into three classes with staggered three-year terms may havewill consist of seven members, six of whom will qualify as "independent" under the effectlisting standards of delaying or preventing changesthe NYSE. The Board determined to reduce our board size in control of our Company or management.response to stockholder feedback, including from the Engaged Group.
Committees of the Board
Our Board has established an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.Committee as standing committees of the Board. Members serve on these committees until their resignation or other departure from the Board, or until otherwise determined by our Board. The following table provides current membership information for 2020 for each of our Board committees:Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee:
NameAudit

Committee
Compensation

Committee
Nominating and

Corporate Governance

Committee
Andrew Gessow
quot00044.jpg
Lorraine Hariton(1)
Kimberly Anstett
quot0005.jpg
Steve HorowitzAndrew Gessow
quot0005.jpg
Lorraine Hariton
quot0005.jpg
Alison Hawkins
quot0005.jpg
Eric Higgs
quot0005.jpg
quot0005.jpg
Robert McDonald
quot0004.jpg
Michelle McKennaquot00063.jpg
quot00058.jpg
quot00058.jpg
David Oppenheimer quot0006.jpg
quot0004.jpg
quot0005.jpg
Christy WyattJoseph Reece
quot00058.jpgquot0004.jpg
Michael Wargotz quot0006.jpg
quot0005.jpg
quot0005.jpg
quot0004.jpg= Chairperson
quot0005.jpg= Member quot0006.jpg= Financial Expert
(1)Ms. Hariton was appointed to serve on the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee effective January 25, 2021.
27


Effective upon and subject to the election of our Class I directors at the Annual Meeting as well as the departures of five current directors as disclosed above, the composition of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is expectedwill change appreciably, with the specific members of each committee to remainbe determined following the same as it is currently comprised.Annual Meeting.
16


chart-616b3044c0fd412aaf21.jpgchart-cad3c84385b14bbfba01.jpgchart-d38f2672e19c4b3287c1.jpg
Audit Committee
Our Audit Committee currentlycurrently consists of Mr.Ms. Hawkins as well as Messrs. Higgs, Oppenheimer, and Mses. McKenna and Wyatt,Wargotz, with Mr. Oppenheimer serving as our Audit Committee chairperson. Mr. Higgs joined the Audit Commitee on March 23, 2022, and Mr. Wargotz joined the Audit Committee on February 22, 2023. Our Board has determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee possess the level of financial literacy and sophistication required under the listing standards of the NYSE, and that each of Mr. Oppenheimer and Ms. McKenna areMr. Wargotz is an audit committee financial expertsexpert as defined by SEC rules. Our Board has also determined that Messr.each of Ms. Hawkins and Messrs. Higgs, Oppenheimer and Mses. McKenna and WyattWargotz satisfy the independence requirements of Audit Committee members under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing standardsstandards of the NYSE. Our Audit Committee met seventhirteen times and did not act by written consent during 2020.2022.
Our Audit Committee is responsible for, among other things:
appointing, compensating, retaining and overseeing our independent registered public accounting firm, and considering, to the extent advisable and appropriate, whether to rotate the independent registered public accounting firm;
approving the audit and non-audit services to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm;
reviewing, with our independent registered public accounting firm, all critical accounting policies and procedures;procedures, and any critical audit matters addressed in the audit of the Company's financial statements;
overseesoverseeing the performance of our internal audit function;
reviewing with management the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal control structure and procedures for financial reports;
reviewing, and discussing with management and our independent registered public accounting firm, our annual audited financial statements and any certification, report, opinion or review rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm;
reviewing and investigating conduct alleged to be in violation of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, if requested by the Board;
reviewing and approving related party transactions;
reviewing, and discussing with management, procedures and any related policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management;
reviewing, and discussing with management, cybersecurity and other information technology risks, including steps management have taken to mitigate such risks;
preparing the Audit Committee report required in our annual proxy statement; and
reviewing and evaluating, at least annually, its own performance and the adequacy of the Audit Committee charter.
The Audit Committee operates under a written charter that was adopted by our Board and satisfies the applicable standards of the SEC and the NYSE.Board. A copy of the Audit Committee charter is posted under the “Governance” portion of the “Investors” section on our website at http://investors.quotient.com/investors/governance/governance-documents/default.aspx.

17


Compensation Committee
Our Compensation Committee currently consists of Messrs. Gessow andGessow, Higgs, Oppenheimer, and Ms. Wyatt,Reece, with Mr. GessowReece serving as our Compensation Committee chairperson. EachMr. Reece joined the Compensation Committee on May 24, 2022, pursuant to the First Cooperation Agreement, and became Chair in February 2023, in response to stockholder feedback in fall 2022 to appoint a new chairperson of the Compensation Committee (see “Compensation Discussion & Analysis—Compensation Overview—Annual Meeting Results” for additional information on the Compensation Committee’s response to stockholder feedback due to a low say-on-pay vote at the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders). Mr. Higgs joined the Compensation Committee on March 23, 2022. Following the Annual Meeting and pursuant to the Second Cooperation Agreement, Messrs. Gessow, Higgs, and Oppenheimer will no longer serve on the Compensation Committee. Each member of our Compensation Committee satisfies the independence requirements under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing standards of the NYSE. In addition, each member of our Compensation Committee
28


qualifies as a “non-employee director” as defined pursuant to Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act. Our Compensation Committee met fiveten times and acted by written consent twothree times during 2020.2022.
Our Compensation Committee is responsible for, among other things:
reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers;
identifying peer group of companies to be used for comparison purposes in connection with any review of executive officer compensation;
reviewing and approving the following compensation for our Chief Executive Officer and our other executive officers: salaries, bonuses, incentive compensation, equity awards, benefits and perquisites;
recommending the establishment and terms of our incentive compensation plans and equity compensation plans, and administering such plans;
recommending compensation program(s) for non-employee directors;
retaining a compensation consultant to assist it in the performance of its duties, after taking into consideration all factors relevant to the adviser’s independence from management, including those specified by the NYSE;
preparingreviewing the disclosures regarding executive compensation in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis section, and any related reports required by the rules of the SEC, including a Compensation Discussion & Analysis sectionCommittee Report for inclusion in our annual proxy statement;
reviewing the results of any advisory vote on executive compensation and considering whether to recommend adjustments to the Company's executive compensation policies and practices in light of such vote;
approving grants of options and other equity awards to all executive officers, non-employee directors and all other eligible individuals; and
reviewing and evaluating, at least annually, its own performance and the adequacy of the committee charter.
In carrying out these responsibilities, the Compensation Committee reviews all components of executive compensation for consistency with our compensation philosophy and with the interests of our stockholders.
In 2020,2022, our Compensation Committee retained an independent compensation consultant, Radford,Aon's Human Capital practice, a partunit of Aon plc.plc (“Radford”Compensation Consultant” or "Aon"), to assist our Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee assessed the independence of RadfordAon pursuant to SEC and NYSE rules and concluded that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent RadfordAon from independently advising the Compensation Committee.
The Compensation Committee has delegated, in accordance with applicable law, rules and regulations, and our Restated CertificateCharter and Bylaws, authority to an equity awards committee comprised of certain executive officers of our Company to make certain types of equity awards to any employee who is not an executive on our senior leadership team or non-employee director under our Company’s 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2013 Plan") pursuant to the terms of such plan and the equity award guidelines approved by our Compensation Committee.
The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter that was adopted by our Board and satisfies the applicable standards of the SEC and the NYSE.Board. A copy of the Compensation Committee charter is posted under the “Governance” portion of the “Investors” section on our website at http://investors.quotient.com/investors/governance/governance-documents/default.aspx.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee currently consists of Messrs. Horowitz and McDonald and Wargotz, as well as Mses. McKennaAnstett and Hariton, with Mr. McDonald serving as our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee chairperson. Ms. HaritonAnstett joined the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee on January 25, 2021.June 4, 2022, and Mr. Wargotz joined the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee on February 22, 2023. Each member of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee satisfies the independence requirements under applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing standards of the NYSE. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met threefour times and did not act by written consent during 2020.
18


2022.
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for, among other things:
29


assisting our Board in identifying qualified director nominees and recommending nominees for each annual meeting of stockholders;
overseeing the Board’s committee structure and operations;
reviewing and recommending plans of succession for the offices of chief executive officer and other executive officers;
developing, recommending and reviewing corporate governance principles and a code of conduct applicable to us;
reviewing, and discussing with management, disclosure of Company’s corporate governance practices for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement or annual report on Form 10-K, as applicable;
assisting our Board in its evaluation of the performance of our Board, including Board committees and each committee thereof;the leadership structure of the Board;
overseeing corporate governance risks, including risks associated with director independence;
overseeing environmental, social and socialgovernance ("ESG") risks; and the development of policies relating to, and the execution of initiatives and disclosures relating to, ESG risks;
monitoring any changes in the personal circumstances or outside commitments of directors, and considering whether such changes may impact a director's ability to serve on the Board effectively; and
reviewing and evaluating, at least annually, its own performance and the adequacy of the committee charter.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee operates under a written charter that was adopted by our Board and satisfies the applicable standards of the SEC and the NYSE. A copy of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter is posted under the “Governance” portion of the “Investors” section on our website at http://investors.quotient.com/investors/governance/governance-documents/default.aspx.
Board Leadership Structure
On March 23, 2022, the Board separated the role of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. Robert McDonald, an independent director, was appointed Chairman of the Board. The Board has a Lead Independent Director and believes this rolethat the Company having an independent Chairman of the Board addresses the need for independent leadership and an organizational structure for the independent directors. The Lead Independent Director coordinates the activities of the other independent directors, presides over meetings of the Board at which the Chairman of the Board is not present and at each executive session, serves as liaison between the Chairman of the Board and the independent directors, and is available for consultation and direct communication if requested by major stockholders. Andrew Gessow was appointed as our Lead Independent Director effective August 5, 2019.
The Board believes that the Company's Chief Executive Officer is best suited to serve as Chairman because he is the director most familiar with the Company's business and industry, and most capable of effectively identifying strategic priorities and leading any discussion about the Company's business. The Board and management have different perspectives and roles in strategy development. The Company's independent directors bring experience, oversight and expertise from outside the Company and from industry, while the Chief Executive Officer brings industry and company-specific experience and expertise. During 2022, the Board had a Lead Independent Director, Matthew O'Grady, who was appointed pursuant to the First Cooperation Agreement. Mr. O'Grady served in that role until December 31, 2022, the effective date of his resignation from our Board. The First Cooperation Agreement provided that Mr. O'Grady, subject to his willingness to remain in such role, was to serve as Lead Independent Director until the termination date of the First Cooperation Agreement, March 1, 2023. Following the expiration of the First Cooperation Agreement, the Board believesdetermined to eliminate the Lead Independent Director role given that the combined roleChairman of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer promotes strategy development and execution, and facilitates information flow between management and the Board which are essential to effective governance.is independent.
The Company's Chairman of the Board has coordinated the activities of the other independent directors, has presided over meetings of the Board and at each executive session, and is and has been available for consultation and direct communication if requested by major stockholders.
Director Independence
Our Board has undertaken a review of the independence of each director. Based on information provided by each director concerning his or her background, employment and affiliations, our Board has determined that each ofof Messrs. Gessow, Horowitz,Higgs, McDonald, Oppenheimer, Reece and Oppenheimer andWargotz, along with each of Mses. McKenna, Wyatt,Anstett, Hawkins and Hariton, doesdo not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that each of these directors is “independent” as that term is defined under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing standards of the NYSE.



19


Our Board also determined that former directors Steve Horowitz and Matthew O'Grady were independent during the respective periods that each served on our Board.
In considering the independence of the directors, the Board considered the Company's 10-year lease agreement with DW Cal 301 Howard, LLC, a joint venture in which DivcoWest Real Estate Services, LLC is a minority member; and Mr. Gessow's role as Senior Advisor at Divco and as a managing partner at DivCore
30


Equity Partners which is affiliated with Divco. The terms of the lease were negotiated at arms-length and were consistent with market comparisons. Mr. Gessow was not involved in negotiating the lease, making any decisions regarding the lease, or approving the lease. In addition, Divco's share of the total lease payment of $16.3 million was less than 1% of the consolidated gross revenues of each of the Company and Divco in 2020, when we entered into the lease. This level is significantly below the maximum amount permitted under the NYSE listing standards for director independence (i.e., 2% of consolidated gross revenues). Accordingly, the Board determined that Mr. Gessow is independent.
Corporate Governance Practices
Our Board is committed to maintaining a corporate governance structure and practices that enhance oversight and serve the interests of all stockholders. Key corporate governance highlights include:
Separation of Board Chair and CEO rolesü
All directors, other than the CEO, are independentü
Six new directors appointed during the last two yearsü
Standing Board committees are comprised solely of independent directorsü
Annual self-evaluation of the Board and its committeesü
Regular executive sessions of independent directorsü
Annual benchmarking of director compensation against peersü
Ongoing succession planning for CEO and other key executive officersü
Limitation on director service on other public company boardsü
Policy prohibiting hedging and pledging of Company stock by directors and officersü
Meaningful director and executive stock ownership guidelinesü
Declassification of the Board effective after the 2024 annual stockholder meetingü
Director Onboarding and Education
Our Board believes that it is important for directors to be engaged and active during the entirety of their tenures. Accordingly, the Company has developed and maintains a robust orientation program for new directors intended to familiarize them with the Company’s management, operations, strategic priorities, corporate and business plans, risks and opportunities and other issues. Upon their appointment, new directors are invited to visit the Company’s facilities and meet with management and receive a package of briefing materials.
Directors are also encouraged to continue their education with respect to the Company and broader governance, financial and accounting matters, as well as issues affecting the Company’s industry. The Company may, from time to time, offer continuing education programs to assist the directors in maintaining the level of expertise to perform their duties as a director. Additionally, each regularly scheduled Board meeting includes a discussion of the Company’s key priorities, frequently with the guidance of internal and external experts. During 2022, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommended and the Board approved enhancing the Board's education program by obtaining a National Association of Corporate Directors membership for all Board members. The membership, among other things, provides our directors with access to presentations and related materials on a variety of director-education topics.
Board and Committee Evaluations
The Board recognizes that thoughtful and regular self-evaluation is an important aspect of its commitment to sound corporate governance and is critical to promoting the effectiveness of the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees an annual self-evaluation of the Board and each of its committees.
As part of this process, each of the directors evaluates the overall Board and the functioning of the Board’s committees, providing input on topics including Board and committee culture, meeting structure and effectiveness, quality and quantity of meeting materials and information provided to the Board, frequency of interactions with management, and other issues. The feedback received is reviewed by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and the results are shared and discussed with the full Board.
31


The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee utilizes the evaluations to enhance the effectiveness of the Board, and any matters that require further assessment or follow-up are addressed at future Board and committee meetings as needed. Historically, the Board’s annual evaluation process has informed Board decisions and actions with respect to Board and committee composition, succession planning, Board leadership and other issues.
Risk Oversight
One of the key functions of our Board is to provide informed oversight of our risk management process. Our Board administers its oversight function directly as a whole, as well as through various standing committees of our boardBoard that address risks inherent in their respective areas of oversight, which they regularly report back to the full Board. While management is responsible for the day-to-day management of the material risks we face, our Board believes that evaluating, on a quarterly basis, the executive team’s management of the various short-term and long-term risks confronting the Company is one of its most important areas of oversight.
Our management team conducts an annual enterprise risk management (“ERM”) process designed to identify, assess and manage risks. Our General Counsel, Compliance Officer & Secretary, who reports to the Chief Executive Officer, and our Chief Information Security Officer, who reports to our Chief Operating Officer, manage the ERM process with the help of our internal audit function.During the annual ERM process, our senior leadership identifies and prioritizes key enterprise risks, taking into account potential impact and likelihood of occurrence, and develops response plans; progress against such plans are then reported and tracked. The Board has designated the Audit Committee with primary responsibility for overseeing the ERM process. The Audit Committee regularly reviews the steps management has taken to monitor and mitigate the identified enterprise risk management.risks and receives and reviews ERM reports from management on a quarterly basis. In accordance with this responsibility, the Audit Committee monitors the Company’s significant business risks, including financial, financial reporting, operational, privacy, cybersecurity, business continuity and legal and regulatory compliance. The Audit Committee reviewscompliance risks. Strategic business risks are overseen by the steps management has taken to monitor and mitigate these risks. Board.
With respect to cybersecurity, the Audit Committee reviews reports from ourCompany’s Chief Information Security Officer provides quarterly updates to the Audit Committee regarding cybersecurity risks, issues and otherskey metrics. In addition, a member of our Board, Kimberly Anstett, has experience leading cybersecurity programs and assists the Audit Committee in its oversight of cybersecurity. The Audit Committee also periodically consults with outside experts on its assessment of the Company's cybersecurity program. Various Company cybersecurity practices and programs have been implemented in response to the Audit Committee’s oversight of cybersecurity including anthe procuring of cybersecurity insurance, having a third-party expert perform a cybersecurity assessment, and establishing information security training exercises for employees (including employee testing through imitation phishing emails sent to employees, and concomitant learning relating to the testing). The Company also undergoes a periodic rating from a third-party known as BitSight Technologies, Inc., a security reporting service. An independent expertthird-party auditor has determined that assessedcertain of the Company’s cybersecurity policiesproducts are “SOC2 Type 2” compliant. SOC2 is a standard developed by the American Institute of CPAs relating to how companies should handle and programs. These reports include updates on risk managementstore customer data consistent with five trust service principles: security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and technical developments.privacy.
While the Audit Committee has primary responsibility for overseeing enterprise risk managementERM and reports regularly to the Board, the other Board committees also consider risks within their area of responsibility and apprise the Board of significant risks and management’s response to those risks. For example, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee monitors legal and regulatory compliance risks as they relate to Quotient’s corporate governance structure and processes, oversees our succession planning, and has oversight over environmental and social risks. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also oversees annual performance evaluations of the Board and of each committee. The Compensation Committee reviews risks related to compensation matters. While the Board and its committees oversee risk management strategy, management is responsible for implementing and supervising day-to-day risk management processes and reporting to the Board and its committees.
In establishing and reviewing our executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee considers whether the program encourages unnecessary or excessive risk-taking and, in consultation with its independent compensation consultant, has concluded that it does not. The program includes several components. Base salaries are fixed in amount and thus do not encourage risk-taking. By tying our Annual Incentive Plan to specific corporate financial performance measures, requiring a minimum performance level to receive any payout, and applying a cap on annual cash incentive awards, we mitigate against risk-taking behavior. For the same reason, we grant long term incentives in the form of optionsRSUs and RSUs,PSUs, subject to service requirements that reward performance in the form of financial goals and/or stock appreciation. We also maintain stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers. Collectively, these policiespractices help to mitigate against risk-taking.
In 2020, we formedOur Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee monitors legal and regulatory compliance risks as they relate to Quotient’s corporate governance structure and processes, oversees our succession planning, and also oversees annual performance evaluations of the Board and of each committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also has oversight over environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) risks. On the governance front, recent actions that have resulted from this oversight include the separation of the
32


Board chairman and chief executive officer roles, and declassification of our Board effective after the commencement of our 2024 Annual Meeting. Social initiatives include DEI initiatives such as recruitment, consideration, and hiring and appointment of diverse candidates at all levels and the establishment of a cross-functional global response team,company-wide, employee-led DEI Council, as well as local response teams in each region wherephilanthropic initiatives through Quotient for Change, a platform used to facilitate employee giving and volunteer work and hosting our second global “Week of Action.” In 2022, we have offices,launched our Quotient Creator Series, a webinar series aimed to monitorcelebrate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business operations and the health and safetydiverse range of our employees. The teams met regularlycontent creators in our social influencer network through a series of roundtable discussions, allowing them to reviewshowcase their creative expertise, share their unique stories and discuss pandemic developments, and to implement measures to manage related risks. Our enterprise risk management plan, and updates to the Audit Committee, included mitigation strategies for COVID-19 risks impacting our business. The Board and Audit Committee were actively engaged in overseeing these risk management strategies and initiatives, receiving updates from the management team and providing input and oversight as we executed our strategy.embrace their authentic identities.


20


Prohibition on Short Sales, Hedging Transactions and Margin Accounts and Pledges
We prohibit (i) all short sales and “selling short against the box” of our stock, (ii) all transactions in derivatives of our stock, this extends to any hedging or similar transaction designed to decrease the risks associated with holding our stock, (iii) pledging of our stock as collateral for loans and (iv) holding our stock in margin accounts, for all our personnel, including non-employee directors, officers, employees, independent contractors and consultants.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a written code of business conduct and ethics (the “Code of Business Conduct and Ethics”), which outlines the principles of legal and ethical business conduct under which we do business. The code is applicable to all of our non-employee directors, officers and employees. We intend to disclose any amendments to our codeCode of business conductBusiness Conduct and ethics,Ethics, or waivers of its requirements, on our website or in filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) to the extent required by applicable rules and exchange requirements. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available under the “Governance” portion of the “Investors” section on our website at http://investors.quotient.com/investors/governance/governance-documents/default.aspx.
Director Stock Ownership Guidelines
In 2016, our Board adopted stock ownership guidelines for our non-employee directors. Under the guidelines, non-employee directors are expected to own shares of Quotient common stock, the lesser of a value equal to three times their annual cash retainer or 7,500 shares, for serving as a director. Shares may be owned directly by the individual, owned jointly with or separately by the individual’s spouse, or held in trust for the benefit of the individual, the individual’s spouse or children. Each non-employee director is required to satisfy the stock ownership guidelines by October 24, 2021, or within five years after first becoming subject to the guidelines. As of December 31, 2021, Messrs. Gessow, Horowitz,June 30, 2023, as regards our directors other than those not standing for re-election or who are resigning from the Board effective as of the Annual Meeting, Mr. McDonald and Oppenheimer and Mses. McKenna and Wyatt havehas already satisfied the stock ownership guidelines and we believe Messrs. Reece and Wargotz, as well as Ms. Hariton isAnstett, are on track to meet the objective within the required time frame.
Meetings of the Board
Our Board met sixsixteen times and acteddid not act by written consent two times during 2020.2022. No director attended fewer than 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and of any Board committees of which he or she was a member during 2020.2022.
Director Commitments
Our Board believes that all members of the board should have sufficient time and attention to devote to board duties and to otherwise fulfill the responsibilities required of directors. Each Board member is expected to ensure that other existing and planned future commitments do not materially interfere with their service as a director. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines also includes limits on board memberships. Directors who serve as CEOs or equivalent positions should not serve on more than two boards of public companies, in addition to our Board, and other directors should not serve on more than four other public company boards in addition to our Board.
While our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Board recognize that certain institutional investors and proxy advisory firms may deem Ms. Wyatt “overboarded” based on the number of public company boards on which she serves, they believe Ms. Wyatt has demonstrated the ability to dedicate sufficient time to, and to focus on, her duties as a director of the Company, including her role as a member of our audit and compensation committee. In fiscal 2020, Ms. Wyatt has attended all board and applicable committee meetings at all companies where she serves as a board member. Ms. Wyatt's attendance record demonstrates her commitment to our board, participating in 100% of board meetings and 100% of the audit and compensation committee meetings since her appointment in July 2018. Ms. Wyatt's other public company boards have offices located in San Jose, enabling her to travel and regularly attend our board and committee meetings. Ms. Wyatt is consistently prepared and has exemplary participation at meetings, contributes significantly to discussions and decision-making, and is highly engaged with management and other members of our board of directors.

21


Attendance at Annual Stockholder Meetings by the Board
33


It is our policy that directors are invited and encouraged to attend our annual meetings of stockholders. Directors Boal,Anstett, Gessow, Hariton, Hawkins, Higgs, McDonald, Oppenheimer and HorowitzReece, along with former director Mr. O'Grady, attended Quotient’s virtual-only 20202022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The members of the Compensation Committee during 2022 consisted of Messrs. Gessow, andHiggs, Oppenheimer and Ms. Wyatt.Reece. Mr. Reece joined the Compensation Committee in May 2022, pursuant to the First Cooperation Agreement, and became Chair in February 2023. None of the current members of the Compensation Committee is currently or has been at any time one of our officers or employees. None of our executive officers currently serves, or in the past year has served, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our Board or Compensation Committee.
Considerations in Evaluating Director Nominees
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for identifying, evaluating and recommending candidates to the Board for Board membership. A variety of methods are used to identify and evaluate director nominees, with the goal of maintaining and further developing a diverse, experienced and highly qualified Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does consider the diversity of its directors and nominees in terms of knowledge, experience, background, skills, expertise and other demographic factors. Candidates may come to our attention through current members of our Board, professional search firms, stockholders or other persons. Mr. Reece and Mr. Wargotz were introduced to the Board by the Engaged Group and appointed to the Board following recommendation by the Engaged Group pursuant to the First Cooperation Agreement. Ms. Figurelli and Ms. Vanek came to the attention of the Company through a current member of the Board and are being nominated for election as directors pursuant to the Company's agreement with the Engaged Group as set forth the Second Cooperation Agreement.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will recommend to the Board for selection all nominees to be proposed by the Board for election by the stockholders, including approval or recommendation of a slate of director nominees to be proposed by the Board for election at each annual meeting of stockholders, and will recommend all director nominees to be appointed by the Board to fill interim director vacancies.
Director Qualifications
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also reviews and recommends to the Board for determination the desired qualifications, expertise and characteristics of Board members, with the goal of developing a diverse, experienced and highly qualified Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board believe that candidates for director should have certain minimum qualifications, including, without limitation:
the highest personal and professional ethics and integrity;
proven achievement and competence in the candidate’s field and ability to exercise sound business judgment;
skills that are complementary to those of the existing Board;
the ability to assist and support management and make significant contributions to the Company’s success;
an understanding of the fiduciary responsibilities that is required of a member of the Board and the commitment of time and energy necessary to diligently carry out those responsibilities;
ability to read and understand financial statements and other financial information pertaining to the Company;
commitment to enhancing stockholder value;
willingness to act in the interest of all stockholders; and
for non-employee directors, independence under NYSE listing standards and other applicable rules and regulations.
In the context of the Board’s existing composition, we may add other requirements that are expected to contribute to the Board’s overall effectiveness and meet the needs of the Board and its committees.


2234



Board Diversity
Our Board believes that its strength and effectiveness is enhanced if its members bring a diverse and complementary range of skills, experiences and perspectives. Accordingly, the Board seeks candidates with strong and diverse backgrounds who possess knowledge and skills in areas of importance to the Company. In addition to seeking candidates with diverse professional backgrounds, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also seeks a mix of diverse personal backgrounds and life experiences. Though the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not utilize quotas, the Committee does consider diversity as a criterion when evaluating prospective new directors.
Stockholder Recommendations for NominationsDirector Candidates
Stockholders may recommend the names of potential director candidates to our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for its consideration. Any such recommendation should include the nominee’s name and qualifications for membership on our Board
and should be directed to our Secretary at Quotient Technology Inc., 1260 East Stringham Avenue, Suite 600, Salt Lake City, Utah 84106. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider properly submitted stockholder recommendations for candidates for our Board who meet the minimum qualifications as described above. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not intend to alter the manner in which it evaluates candidates, including the minimum criteria set forth above, based on whether or not the candidate was recommended by a stockholder. A stockholder of record holding at least three percent of the fully diluted capitalization of the Company continuously for at least twelve (12) months prior to the date of the submission of the recommendation can recommend a candidate for nomination to the Board by complying with our Bylaws and our Restated Certificate and applicable laws, rule and regulations, included those promulgated by the SEC. Any eligible stockholder who wishes to directly submit a nomination should review the requirements in Section 2.15 of the Bylaws on nominations by stockholders. Any recommendation or nomination should be sent in writing to the General Counsel, Quotient Technology Inc., 400 Logue Avenue, Mountain View, California 94043. Submissions must include the full name of the proposed nominee, home and business contact information, detailed biographical data, relevant qualifications, a signed letter from the candidate confirming willingness to serve, information regarding any relationships between the candidate and the Company, other information specified in our Bylaws, and evidence of the recommending stockholder’s ownership of Company stock in the amount and for the time period required. These candidates are evaluated by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and may be considered at any point during the year. If any materials are provided by
Our Bylaws also establish an advance notice procedure for stockholders who wish to present a stockholder in connection with the recommendation of aproposal (including one or more director candidate, such materials are forwarded to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
All proposals of stockholders that are intended to be presented by such stockholder atnominations) before an annual meeting of stockholders mustbut do not intend for the proposal to be included in writing and notice mustour proxy statement. Such business may be deliveredbrought before the annual meeting by a stockholder of record entitled to the Secretaryvote at the annual meeting who has delivered timely written notice to our Secretary containing the information specified in our Bylaws. To be timely for our 2024 Annual Meeting, our Secretary must receive the written notice at our principal executive offices no earlier than April 5, 2024; and no later than the close of Quotientbusiness on May 5, 2024. In the event that we hold our 2024 Annual Meeting more than 30 days before or more than 30 days after the one-year anniversary of the 2023 Annual Meeting, then notice of a stockholder proposal that is not intended to be included in our proxy statement must be received no earlier than the 120th day before such annual meeting and no later than the close of business on the ninetieth (90th) day nor earlier thanlater of: the close of business on the one hundred and twentieth (120th)90th day prior to such annual meeting, or the first anniversary10th day following the day on which public announcement of the preceding year’sdate of such annual meeting. Stockholders are also advised to reviewmeeting is first made. You may contact our Bylaws, which contain additionalSecretary at our principal executive offices for a copy of the relevant Bylaw provisions regarding the requirements with respect to advance notice offor making stockholder proposals and nominating director nominations.candidates.
For the 2023 Annual Meeting, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has not received a candidate recommendation or a nomination pursuant to the advance notice procedure in our Bylaws from any stockholder or group of stockholders, including any stockholder or group of stockholders that beneficially owns more than five percent of our common stock, except for the director candidate nominations and recommendations of the Engaged Group pursuant to the Second Cooperation Agreement.
Non-Employee Director Compensation
Non-employee directors receive compensation under our outside director compensation policy (the “Director Compensation Policy”) in the form of equity granted under the terms of our 2013 Equity Incentive Plan, (the “2013 Plan”), and cash, as described below. The policy is reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee in conjunction with the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant in order to inform any policy decisions. No changes were madedecisions with respect to our outsideexecutive compensation program. They consider multiple factors, including total compensation relative to our peer group, market survey data, board leadership and committees, and board governance trends. In June 2023, the Board adopted a deferred compensation plan that permits non-employee directors to defer all or a portion of their equity compensation until after their service as a director compensation policy for 2020.terminates.
Cash Compensation
In connection with his or hertheir service as a director and consistent with the Director Compensation Policy, each non-employee director receives an annual cash retainer of $37,500 for serving on our Board. ThePrior to July 26, 2022 the Lead Independent Director received an additional annual cash retainer of $15,000. Effective as of July
35


26, 2022, the Lead Independent Director received no additional cash retainer. Effective as of March 23, 2023, the Independent Board Chair receives an additional annual cash retainer of $15,000.$40,000.
The chairperson and members of the three standing committees of our Board are also entitled to the following additional annual cash retainers:
Board CommitteeChairperson Fee ($)Member Fee ($)
Audit Committee21,500 10,000 
Compensation Committee15,000 6,250 
Nominating and Corporate Governance
   Committee
8,000 3,500 
During 2022, the Board established the Strategic Committee, a non-standing committee of the Board. On June 19, 2023, the Board dissolved the Strategic Committee. During 2022, and through June 19, 2023, Mr. Gessow and Ms. Hawkins served on the Strategic Committee. At various times during 2022, Messrs. Oppenheimer, Reece, and O'Grady served on the Strategic Committee. During 2023, Mr. Reece served on the Strategic Committee until June 19, 2023, and Mr. Wargotz served on the Strategic Committee from February 2023, when he joined the Board, until June 19, 2023. Each member of the Strategic Committee receives an annual cash retainer of $10,000, pro-rated for the portion of the twelve-month period that he/she served on the Strategic Committee.
All cash retainers are paid in quarterly installments to each non-employee director who has served in the relevant capacity for the immediately preceding fiscal quarter no later than 30 days following the end of such preceding fiscal quarter. A non-employee director who has served in the relevant capacity for only a portion of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter will receive a prorated payment of the quarterly payment of the applicable annual cash retainer.


23


Equity Compensation
Initial grant. Upon appointment to our Board, each non-employee director is granted an award (the “Initial Award”) of Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) as compensation for his or her service. The number of RSUs subject to the Initial Award is determined by dividing $250,000 by the closing price of our stock on the grant date or as computed in accordance with such other methodology as our Board or Compensation Committee may determine. The grant date of the Initial Award is the fifth trading day of the month immediately following the month in which the individual first becomes a non-employee director. The RSUs subject to the Initial Award vest as to one-third (1/3) of such RSUs on each of the shares each annual anniversaryfirst three anniversaries of the date on which such person first becomes a non-employee director, subject to continued service as a director through the applicable vesting date.
Annual award. Each continuing non-employee director will beis granted an award of RSUs (the “Annual RSU Award”) on the date of the annual meeting of stockholders as compensation for his or her service. The number of RSUs subject to the Annual Award will beis determined by dividing $175,000 by the closing price of our stock on the grant date or as computed in accordance with such other methodology as our Board or Compensation Committee may determine. The grant date of the Annual Award is the date of the annual meeting of stockholders. The RSUs subject to the Annual Award vest upon the earlier of (i) the day prior to the next year’s annual meeting of stockholders or (ii) one year from the grant date, subject to continued service as a director through the applicable vesting date.
The following table provides information for the year ended December 31, 20202022 regarding all compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to each person who served as a non-employee director in 2020.2022.
Non-Employee Director Compensation — 20202022
NameFees Earned or
Paid in
Cash ($)
Stock
Awards
($)(1)
Total ($)
Andrew Gessow67,500174,998242,498
Lorraine Hariton(2)
Steve Horowitz41,000174,998215,998
Robert McDonald45,500174,998220,498
Michelle McKenna51,000174,998225,998
David Oppenheimer65,250174,998240,248
Christy Wyatt53,750174,998228,748
36


NameFees Earned or
Paid in
Cash ($)
Stock
Awards
($)(1)
Total ($)
Kimberly Anstett24,652424,998449,650
Andrew Gessow63,667174,998238,665
Lorraine Hariton41,000174,998215,998
Alison Hawkins55,250174,998230,248
Eric Higgs42,583424,996467,579
Steve Horowitz(2)
17,45917,459
Robert McDonald77,704174,998252,702
Matthew O'Grady(3)
39,239424,996464,235
David Oppenheimer68,515174,998243,513
Joseph Reece35,621424,996460,617
Christy Wyatt(4)
12,243103,10212,243
(1)The amounts reported reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs granted during the year as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptionassumptions used to calculate these amounts are discussed in Note 10 to our notes to consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020,2022, as filed with the SEC on February 23, 2021.March 16, 2023. As required by SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. Note that the amounts reported in this column reflect the accounting cost for these stock awards and do not correspond to the actual economic value that may be received by the directors from them. For Ms. Wyatt, this amount includes the incremental fair value associated with the modification of her outstanding 2021 Annual RSU Award granted on June 3, 2021 to provide for accelerated vesting in connection with her resignation from the Board. This amount is required to be included per SEC disclosure rules and does not reflect a new grant.
(2)Mr. Horowitz resigned from the Board effective June 3, 2022.
(3)Mr. O'Grady's Annual RSU Award of $174,998 and Initial RSU Award of $249,998 was cancelled upon his resignation from the Board, which became effective as of December 31, 2022.
(4)Ms. Hariton was appointed as a non-employee directorWyatt resigned from the Board effective January 25, 2021 and therefore received no compensation in 2020.March 24, 2022.
Our non-employee directors held the following number of outstanding stock options orand RSU awards as of December 31, 2020.2022.
NameNameStock OptionsRSUsNameStock OptionsRSUs
Kimberly AnstettKimberly Anstett138,240
Andrew GessowAndrew Gessow151,99222,727Andrew Gessow151,99255,732
Lorraine Hariton(1)
Steve Horowitz44,03522,727
Lorraine HaritonLorraine Hariton72,584
Alison HawkinsAlison Hawkins76,182
Eric HiggsEric Higgs96,382
Steve Horowitz(1)
Steve Horowitz(1)
Robert McDonaldRobert McDonald33,161Robert McDonald55,732
Michelle McKenna27,159
Matthew O'Grady(2)
Matthew O'Grady(2)
David OppenheimerDavid Oppenheimer21,55122,727David Oppenheimer21,55155,732
Christy Wyatt31,591
Joseph ReeceJoseph Reece111,535
Christy Wyatt(3)
Christy Wyatt(3)
(1)Ms. Hariton was appointed as a non-employee directorMr. Horowitz resigned from the Board effective January 25, 2021June 3, 2022.
(2)Mr. O'Grady resigned from the Board effective December 31, 2022 and therefore had no outstanding stock options or RSU awards as of December 31, 2020.2022.

(3)Ms. Wyatt resigned from the Board effective March 24, 2022.
24


Stockholder and Other Interested Party Communications with the Board
Stockholders and other interested parties who wish to communicate with the non-management or independent members of our Board may do so by letters addressed to the attention of our General Counsel.
All communications are reviewed by the General Counsel and are routed to the appropriate member(s) of the Board consistent with our Policies and Procedures for Stockholder and Other Interested Party Communications to Independent Directors. A copy of our Policies and Procedures for Stockholder and Other Interested Party Communications to Independent Directors is posted under the “Governance” portion of the “Investors”
37


“Investors” section on our website at http://investors.quotient.com/investors/governance/governance-documents/default.aspx.
The address for these communications is:
Quotient Technology Inc.
Attn: General Counsel
400 Logue1260 East Stringham Avenue, Suite 600
Mountain View, CA 94043Salt Lake City, Utah 84106


First Cooperation Agreement with the Engaged Group
On May 16, 2022, the Company entered into the First Cooperation Agreement. The Cooperation Agreement expired by its own terms on March 1, 2023.
Pursuant to the First Cooperation Agreement, the Board appointed Matthew O’Grady to the Board to serve as a Class II director and Joseph Reece (together with Mr. O’Grady, the “New Directors”) to the Board to serve as a Class III director. The Board also, on May 24, 2022, appointed Mr. O’Grady to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Mr. Reece to the Compensation Committee. Mr. O’Grady was also appointed to serve as Lead Independent Director for the duration of the First Cooperation Agreement. Effective as of the Company's 2022 annual meeting of stockholders, all Class III directors became Class II directors. Mr. O'Grady resigned as a director effective as of December 31, 2022.
The Board also agreed to nominate for election at the Annual Meeting Matthew Krepsik, Robert McDonald, and Matthew O’Grady.
Pursuant to the First Cooperation Agreement, the Company agreed to seek stockholder approval of an amendment to the Charter. which amendment was approved at the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders. Further, under the terms of the First Cooperation Agreement, Steven Boal agreed to retire as CEO no later than the 2022 annual meeting and to not stand for reelection as a director at the 2022 annual meeting, each of which events occurred.
The First Cooperation Agreement further provided, among other things, that:
• During the term of the First Cooperation Agreement, the number of authorized directors on the Board will not exceed ten directors without the consent of the Engaged Group, with such consent not to be unreasonably withheld.
• During the term of the First Cooperation Agreement and for so long as the Engaged Group continuously beneficially owned in the aggregate at least the lesser of (i) 2.5% of outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock and (ii) 2,373,037 shares of common stock, the Engaged Group was entitled to recommend a replacement independent director who is not an affiliate of the Engaged Group in the event any New Director ceases to be a director of the Company for any reason, subject to certain conditions and the approval of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld. Subsequent to Mr. O'Grady's resignation as a director, the Engaged Group recommended a replacement director, Michael Wargotz. On February 22, 2023, the Board appointed Mr. Wargotz to the Board.
• During the term of the First Cooperation Agreement, the Engaged Group was subject to customary standstill restrictions, including with respect to nominating persons for election to the Board, submitting any proposal for consideration at any stockholder meeting and soliciting any proxy, consent or other authority to vote from stockholders or conducting any other referendum (including any “withhold,” “vote no” or similar campaign), and acquiring beneficial ownership of, or economic exposure to, more than 9.9% of the Common Stock for so long as the Company’s Tax Benefits Preservation Plan and the rights established thereunder remained in force. The Company Tax Benefits Preservation Plan expired on January 3, 2023.
• During the term of the First Cooperation Agreement, the Engaged Group agreed to vote all shares of common stock and voting securities beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by the Engaged Group at all annual and special meetings as well as in any consent solicitation of the Company’s stockholders (i) in favor of the nominees for director recommended by the Board, and (ii) in accordance with the Board’s recommendation with respect to any other matter (unless Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. issued a
2538


contrary recommendation). Pursuant to the First Cooperation Agreement, the Engaged Group was permitted to vote on any proposals relating to an extraordinary transaction in its sole discretion.
• Each party agreed not to disparage the other party, subject to certain exceptions.
• During the term of the First Cooperation Agreement, each party agreed not to institute a lawsuit against the other party, subject to certain exceptions including the seeking of remedies for a breach of the First Cooperation Agreement. Additionally, during the term of the First Cooperation Agreement and for an additional two years after its termination, each party agreed not to institute a lawsuit against the other party relating to or arising out of any event occurring on or prior to the date of the First Cooperation Agreement.
• By its terms, the First Cooperation Agreement was to terminate as of the earliest to occur of (i) 30 calendar days prior to the notice deadline under the Company’s Bylaws for the nomination of director candidates for election to the Board at the Company’s 2023 annual meeting of stockholders, (ii) 120 calendar days prior to the first anniversary of the Company’s 2022 annual meeting of stockholders and (iii) the consummation of an extraordinary transaction. Such termination date was March 1, 2023.
The foregoing summary of the First Cooperation Agreement does not purport to be complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety, by the full text of the Cooperation Agreement, which is attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company on May 18, 2022.
Second Cooperation Agreement with the Engaged Group
On June 5, 2022, the Company entered into the Second Cooperation Agreement. Other than the Second Cooperation Agreement, there are no other arrangements or understandings between any of our directors and any other person pursuant to which any person was selected as a director.
The Second Cooperation Agreement provides, among other things, that:
• The Company will reduce the board size from ten (10) directors to seven (7) directors effective as of the date of the Annual Meeting (and the number of authorized directors shall not be increased without the consent of the Engaged Group).
• The Company will include Joseph Reece, Michael Wargotz, Tracey Figurelli (each of the foregoing three, an "EC Replacement Rights Director"), Matthew Krepsik, Robert McDonald, and Kate Vanek in its proxy statement and proxy card as director nominees of the Board.
• During the term of the Second Cooperation Agreement and for so long as the Engaged Group continuously beneficially owns in the aggregate at least the lesser of (i) 2.5% of outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock and (ii) 2,457,930 shares of the Company's common stock, the Engaged Group will be entitled to recommend a replacement independent director, who is not an affiliate of the Engaged Group, in the event any EG Replacement Rights Director ceases to be a director of the Company for any reason, subject to certain conditions and the approval of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld.
• During the term of the Second Cooperation Agreement, the Engaged Group will be subject to customary standstill restrictions, including with respect to nominating persons for election to the Board, submitting any proposal for consideration at any stockholder meeting and soliciting any proxy, consent or other authority to vote from stockholders or conducting any other referendum (including any “withhold,” “vote no” or similar campaign), and acquiring beneficial ownership of, or economic exposure to, more than 9.9% of the Common Stock.
• During the term of the Second Cooperation Agreement, the Engaged Group will vote all shares of common stock and voting securities beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by the Engaged Group at all annual and special meetings as well as in any consent solicitation of the Company’s stockholders (i) in favor of the nominees for director recommended by the Board, and (ii) in accordance with the Board’s recommendation with respect to any other matter (unless Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. issues a contrary recommendation). The Engaged Group will be permitted to vote on any proposals relating to an extraordinary transaction in its sole discretion.
• Each party agreed not to disparage the other party, subject to certain exceptions.
• During the term of the Second Cooperation Agreement, each party agreed not to institute a lawsuit against the other party, subject to certain exceptions including the seeking of remedies for a breach of the Second Cooperation Agreement. Additionally, during the term of the Second Cooperation Agreement and for
39


an additional two years after its termination, each party agreed not to institute a lawsuit against the other party relating to or arising out of any event occurring on or prior to the date of the Second Cooperation Agreement.
• By its terms, the Second Cooperation Agreement will terminate as of the earliest to occur of (i) 30 calendar days prior to the notice deadline under the Company’s Bylaws for the nomination of director candidates for election to the Board at the Company’s 2024 annual meeting of stockholders, (ii) 120 calendar days prior to the first anniversary of the Company’s 2023 annual meeting of stockholders and (iii) the consummation of an extraordinary transaction.
The foregoing summary of the Second Cooperation Agreement does not purport to be complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety, by the full text of the Second Cooperation Agreement, which is attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company on June 6, 2023.
40



REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
With respect to Quotient’s financial reporting process, the management of Quotient is responsible for (1) establishing and maintaining internal controls and (2) preparing Quotient’s consolidated financial statements. Quotient’s independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young, is responsible for auditing these financial statements. It is the responsibility of the Audit Committee to oversee these activities. The Audit Committee does not itself prepare financial statements or perform audits, and its members are not auditors or certifiers of Quotient’s financial statements.
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20202022 with management of the Company. The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB and the SEC. The Audit Committee has also received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountants’ communications with the audit committeeAudit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the accounting firm’s independence. Based on the foregoing, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.2022.
Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Board:
David Oppenheimer (Chairperson)
Michelle McKennaAlison Hawkins
Christy WyattEric D. Higgs

Michael Wargotz

2641



CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Other than the executive and non-employee director compensation arrangements, including the employment, termination of employment and change in control arrangements, discussed below under “Executive Compensation,” the indemnification arrangements with our executive officers and non-employee directors discussed below under “Indemnification Agreements,” and the transactions described below in this section, we were not party to any transactions since January 1, 20192022 in which:
the amounts involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000; and
any of our directors, executive officers or holders of more than 5% of our capital stock, or any member of the immediate family of, or person sharing the household with, the foregoing persons, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
San Francisco Office Lease
The Company entered into a lease agreement with DW Cal 301 Howard, LLC ("DW Cal") on February 28, 2020, for approximately 15,607 square feet of office space in San Francisco, for a term of 10 years. The total minimum future rental payments for the lease is $16.3 million. DW Cal is a joint venture in which DivcoWest Real Estate Services, LLC is a minority member. Mr. Gessow, one of our independent directors, serves as a Senior Advisor at Divco and is a managing partner at DivCore Equity Partners which is affiliated with Divco. All terms of the lease were negotiated at arms-length. The transaction was presented to our Audit Committee and approved in accordance with our Policy and Procedures with Respect to Transactions with Related Persons; and was also approved by our Board. Mr. Gessow was not involved in decisions regarding the lease or in the Board and Audit Committee's approval thereof.
Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement
In June 2011, we entered into an Eighth Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement with the holders of our preferred stock. Such agreement provides, among other things, for certain rights relating to the registration of their shares of common stock, including those issued upon conversion of their preferred stock, including the right to demand that we file a registration statement or request that their shares be covered by a registration statement that we are otherwise filing.
First Cooperation Agreement
On May 16, 2022, we entered into the First Cooperation Agreement with the Engaged Group, which expired by its own terms on March 1, 2023. As part of the First Cooperation Agreement, we agreed to reimburse the Engaged Group for their reasonable, documented out-of-pocket fees and expenses incurred in connection with the negotiation and entry into the First Cooperation Agreement and related matters up to an amount of $500,000. Also as part of the First Cooperation Agreement, former director Matthew O'Gray and current director Joseph Reece were, respectively, nominated for election to the Board and appointed to the Board, each thereby served on the Board, and accordingly each had an indirect material interest in the First Cooperation Agreement. Additionally, current director Michael Wargotz was appointed to the Board in February 2023 as the Engaged Group-recommended replacement for Matthew O'Grady following Mr. O'Grady's resignation from the Board, and accordingly Mr. Wargotz had an indirect material interest in the First Cooperation Agreement. For additional information regarding the provisions of the First Cooperation Agreement, see “Corporate Governance and Directors—First Cooperation Agreement with the Engaged Group”.
Second Cooperation Agreement
On June 5, 2023, we entered into the Second Cooperation Agreement. As part of the Second Cooperation Agreement, we agreed to reimburse the Engaged Group for their reasonable, documented out-of-pocket fees and expenses incurred in connection with the negotiation and entry into the Second Cooperation Agreement and related matters up to an amount of $150,000. For additional information regarding the provisions of the Second Cooperation Agreement, see “Corporate Governance and Directors—Second Cooperation Agreement with the Engaged Group."
Review, approval or ratification of transactions with related parties
42


Our Board recognizes that transactions between our Company and persons or entities that may be deemed related persons can present potential or actual conflicts of interest and create the appearance of impropriety. Accordingly, our Board has delegated authority for the review and approval of all related person transactions to the Audit Committee. We have adopted a written Policy and Procedures with Respect to Transactions with Related Persons to provide procedures for reviewing, approving and ratifying any transaction involving our Company or any of its subsidiaries in which a 5% or greater stockholder, director, executive officer or members of their immediate family have or will have a direct or indirect material interest. This policy is intended to supplement, and not to supersede, our Company’s other policies that may be applicable to or involve transactions with related persons.
The policy provides that the Audit Committee reviews transactions subject to the policy and determines whether or not to approve or ratify those transaction. In reviewing transactions subject to the policy, the Audit or the Chair of the Audit Committee, as applicable, considers among other factors it deems appropriate:
the material terms of the transaction;
the nature of the related party’s interest;
the nature of the related party’s relationship with the Company;
the role of Company employees in arranging the transaction;
the impact on the independence of any director;
the costs and benefits to the Company; and
an assessment of whether the transaction is competitively bid, or otherwise on terms that are fair to the Company and comparable to those that could be obtained in an arms-length negotiation with an unrelated third party.


2743



EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table identifies certain information, as of April 22, 2021,June 30, 2023, about our executive officers. Officers are appointed or elected by the Board to hold office until their successors are elected and qualified. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers. There are no arrangements or understandings between an executive officer and any other person pursuant to which such executive officer was or is to be selected as an officer.

NameAgeCurrent Position(s) with Quotient
Steven BoalMatthew Krepsik5541Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board Member
Scott RaskinYuneeb Khan5948PresidentChief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer, and Chief Operating Officer
Pamela Strayer52Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Connie Chen5456General Counsel, Compliance Officer and Secretary

Matthew Krepsik has served as CEO of the Company since May 2022, and has served as a member of our Board since June 2022. For information on the business background of Mr. Boal,Krepsik, see “Proposal"Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors” above.
Scott Raskin has served as our President since August 2019. Mr. Raskin served on our Board from February 2017 until August 2019 and was Lead Independent Director from November 2017 until August 2019. From June 2019 to August 2019, Mr. Raskin served as an operating partner with Khosla Ventures, a venture capital firm. Mr. Raskin served as the President and Chief Executive Officer at Spigit Inc. (formerly known as Mindjet), a provider of innovation management software from June 2006 until December 2018 (Spigit was acquired in December 2018). Prior to joining Spigit, Mr. Raskin served as President and Chief Operating Officer, from May 2001 to June 2006, at Telelogic AB, a publicly traded, international software company. Additionally, Mr. Raskin has served as chairperson of the board of directors of Neology Inc., a private company and global innovator that is re-imagining mobility for smart cities and safer communities, since June 2019. Mr. Raskin has served as the chairperson of the board of directors of MariaDB, a Finnish private company, since January 2015. From January 2012 to July 2014, Mr. Raskin also served on the board of directors of Cision AB, a Swedish, publicly traded software and information services company, where he was also a member of the compensation committee of its board of directors. Mr. Raskin holds a B.B.A. from the University of Texas.
Pamela Strayer Yuneeb Khan has served as our Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer since November 2019,July 2022, and has simultaneously served as our Chief Operating Officer since February 2023. Prior to joining Quotient, Mr. Khan served from 2020 to 2021 as the Global President of NielsenIQ's Consumer Insights business, a leading all corporatemarketing and consumer research enterprise operating in more than 80 countries. Mr. Khan is a seasoned executive with over 25 years of global finance and information technology functions,business leadership experience with world-renowned companies operating in a diversified set of industries. This includes 12 years (2010-2022) with the Nielsen Holdings plc ("Nielsen") organization, a global leader in audience measurement, data and analytics, during which Mr. Khan served in several high impact roles including accounting, capital structure,Chief Financial Officer of Nielsen Global Connect (the predecessor of NielsenIQ) from 2019 to 2020 and taxChief Financial Officer of Nielsen Global Operations and treasury reporting.Ms. Strayer served asTechnology from 2014 to 2019. Prior to joining Nielsen, Mr. Khan worked in several finance and operational positions with General Electric Company ("GE"), Saudi Basic Industries Corporation ("SABIC"), United Technologies Corporation, Kinnevik AB, Bristol Meyers Squib Company and PricewaterhouseCoopers. Throughout his career, Mr. Khan has built and led global teams, driven global transformation, and played a pivotal role in several large M&A transactions including the chief financial officer$11.6 billion sale of Poly (formerly Plantronics)GE's Plastics division to SABIC in 2007 and the $2.7 billion sale of Nielsen Global Connect to the private equity firm Advent International in 2021. Mr. Khan is a Chartered Accountant with the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan (1999), and is a public global communications company, from 2012 through March 2019. In this role, she was responsible for all aspectsgraduate of the Company’s financial management, in addition to managing the information technology and investor relations organizations. Global organizations that reported into Ms. Strayer included corporate FP&A, sales finance, corporate controller, tax, treasury and trade organization, internal audit, information technology and investor relations. In addition, Ms. Strayer was a director on the boardAdvanced Management Program (2021) of directors for Viavi Solutions, Inc., a publicly traded network test, measurement and assurance technology company, (NASDAQ: VIAV) from August 2015 through February 2018 where she served as chairperson of the audit committee. Ms. Strayer holds a B.S. inHarvard Business Administration from The Ohio State University.School.
Connie Chen has served as our General Counsel, Compliance Officer and Secretary since January 2016 and served as our Senior Director of Legal Affairs from October 2014 to December 2015, and Director of Legal Affairs from September 2013 to October 2014. From 2005 to August 2013, she served as vice president, litigation and deputy general counsel at Rambus Inc., a semiconductor and IP product company. Prior to Rambus, Ms. Chen held positions at the law firm of Morrison & Foerster LLP and WebMD, an internet healthcare technology company, where she served as assistant general counsel. Ms. Chen holds an A.B. from Stanford University and a J.D. from Stanford Law School.

2844



EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
The following discussesThis Compensation Discussion & Analysis describes how the Compensation Committee determined 2022 executive compensation, the elements of our executive compensation program, and the compensation forof our Named Executive Officers ("NEOs"(“NEOs”) for 2020:. For 2022, our NEOs were as follows:
NEOTitle
Matthew Krepsik(1)
Chief Executive Officer and Member of the Board of Directors
Yuneeb Khan(2)
Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer
Connie ChenGeneral Counsel, Compliance Officer and Secretary
Steven Boal(3)
Former Chief Executive Officer
Scott Raskin(4)
President
Pamela Strayer(5)
Former Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
John Kellerman(6)
Former VP of Accounting, Former Interim Chief Financial Officer
(1)Mr. Krepsik assumed the role of Chief Executive Officer our Chief Financial Officer, and three other most highly compensated executives.of Quotient effective as of May 24, 2022.
Steven Boal
Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Scott Raskin
President
Pamela Strayer
(2)Mr. Khan assumed the role of Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Chad Summe(1)
of Quotient effective as of July 5, 2022. Mr. Khan also assumed the role of Chief Operating Officer as of February 22, 2023.
Connie Chen(3)Mr. Boal retired from his role as Chief Executive Officer of Quotient effective as of May 20, 2022. Mr. Boal continued to serve as an employee and member of the Board until June 29, 2022 by agreement between Mr. Boal and Quotient.
General Counsel, Compliance(4)Mr. Raskin agreed to step down as President of Quotient effective as of March 31, 2023.
(5)Ms. Strayer resigned as Chief Financial Officer and SecretaryTreasurer of Quotient effective as of April 5, 2022.
(1)(6)Mr. Summe transitioned to the positionKellerman served as Interim Chief Financial Officer of Chief Strategy Officer onQuotient from April 5, 2022 until July 31, 2020, and on that day5, 2022. His employment with Quotient ceased to be a named executive officereffective as of the Company.November 11, 2022.
Business Overview
Business Description
Quotient is thean industry leading digitalpromotions and media and promotions technology company that creates cohesivedelivers targeted digital promotions and media for advertisers and retailers to reach consumers and drive action. Using our platforms and suite of omnichannel brand-buildingsolutions, advertisers can plan, target, deliver and sales-driving opportunities measure performance marketing to impact sales.
Our customers consist primarily of consumer-packaged goods (“CPG”) companies and their brand marketers (together referred to as “advertisers”) who want to drive sales and positive brand engagement with shoppers. Our digital marketing platform is designed to produce returns on marketing investment for advertisers by utilizing consumer behavior, intent data and point of sale ("POS") data to deliver valuable outcomes for advertisers, retailersthe right marketing message and consumers. The Quotient platform is powered by exclusivecall to action to the right consumer spending data, location intelligenceat the right time, through multiple touchpoints while consumers are engaged online, out of home and purchase intent data to reach millions of shoppers daily and deliver measurable, incremental sales.in-store.
Quotient partners with leading advertisers, publishers and retailers, including Clorox, Procter & Gamble, General Mills, Unilever, Albertsons Companies, CVS, Dollar General, and Peapod Digital Labs, a company of Ahold Delhaize USA.USA, Amazon and Microsoft.
Business Performance
2022 was a year of transformation for Quotient. Despite challenges caused by macroeconomic trends, we continued to execute on our financial and operational priorities, and as a result we entered 2023 with, in our view, a more stable and durable foundation that puts Quotient in a position to deliver profitable growth in the coming years.
Some of our financial and strategic highlights from 2022 include:
We closed the year strong as we utilized our proprietary and/or exclusive data, omnichannel capabilities,generated annual revenues of $288.8 million and integrated media and promotionsAdjusted EBITDA1 of $14.9 million in 2022. Our business was impacted by supply chain issues in 2022 that led CPGs to collaborate and deliver results for our customers and partnerscontinue to pull back on marketing investment, as well as better consumer experiences for shoppers. With our focus on salesby continued macro-economic challenges impacting advertising spending across the industry.
1 For a definition of Adjusted EBITDA and marketing effectiveness in 2020, as well asa reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net loss, the long-term health of the business after the pandemic-related disruptions, we delivered increased revenue of approximately 45% in the second half of 2020 over the first half of 2020. We believe market tailwinds, especially the shift to digital, and the growth drivers we outlined throughout 2020, will continue to drive momentum in 2021 and beyond.
Some highlights are noted below:
Q4 revenue was up 20% over Q4 2019 and up 18% over Q3 2020. We ended 2020 with annual revenues of $445.9 million or 2% growth over the prior year.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic we executed a plan that sustained our business and employment levels throughout the market downturn in Q2. As a result, we experienced no material disruptions to normal operations.
National Promotions remain an opportunity and focus area for us. Smaller CPGs, who have access to deploy spend to national promotions through our platform, remain a growth driver and we experienced annual growth in the number of these customers, along with an increase of approximately 26% in bookings on a dollar basis over the prior year for this segment. Overall, as a result of the pandemic, we saw national promotions flat to slightly down on an annual basis.most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, please see Appendix B.
2945



eCommerce for online grocery remainsOur continued shift in focus from being a growth opportunity. Momentum for sponsored search continued in Q4 2020, as the number of CPGs who bookedfull service agency to being a sponsored search campaign increased approximately 30% comparedtechnology platform provider, which enabled us to Q3 2020. Throughout the year, we saw consistent sequential quarter-over-quarter growth in bookings for this offeringoptimize our cost base and establish what we believe momentumis a healthy EBITDA profile. To achieve this, we took actions that included simplifying our technology, better integrating acquisitions, and conducting responsible workforce reductions.
We improved our capital structure by repaying our $200 million convertible notes in full in December 2022, replacing it with what we believe to be a robust capital structure consisting of a 4 year, $55 million term loan, a $50 million asset based revolving credit facility, and an optimized cash balance.
Our promotions network remained a priority in 2022 and, through the addition of new partners and endpoints, we were able to grow its reach and scale by 7%, as represented by activations of promotions. The network delivered a total of $11.2 billion of savings to consumers throughout 2022, representing a 10% increase year over year, due to this increased reach and the power of our programmatic platform.
We launched Shopmium, our formerly solely EU-focused consumer app, in the U.S. market as an important extension of our promotions business that allows Quotient to establish a first-party data relationship with shoppers and that provides incremental reach for this solution will continue in 2021.our network.
We saw 15% annual growth in our National Media category from CPGs booking more national media campaigns. We see this trend continuing in 1H 2021 as more customers are focused on digital media playing a bigger role in their spend allocation.
Our retail partnerships and network grew in FY 2020. In total we added four partnerships to our network including Shipt, 7-Eleven, Rite Aid and Hy-Vee.
Our retailer performance media (RPM) solution continued to gain market traction. In FY 2020, we saw an increase of over 66% in bookings dollars from our CPG customers utilizing RPM onhave evolved our retailer network versusstrategy with the prior year.
Quotient’s social solutions continue to garner interest, not only from customer demand but also by the industry. In 2020, we ramped up our social effortsaim of addressing challenges facing brands and comparedretailers due to the prior year we saw 17% growth in revenue, a 15% increasesignificant transformation and increasing fragmentation occurring in the number of advertisers investing with Quotient for social activations and a 24% increase in the number of total social campaigns launched.
Weretail media ecosystem. In December 2022 we launched our national rebates solution in Q4 2020Retail Ad Network, which provides consumers with more choice in howaggregates individual retail media networks to enable advertisers to target, manage, execute and where they save while offering brands the ability to execute promotions inmeasure off-site campaigns across multiple retailers through one place with consistent data and measurement.central, transparent platform.

Below is a summary of our financial performance for Fiscal 2020,2022, in comparison to previous fiscal years:


chart-c89b19d808fd4097a881.jpgchart-331b2e93573243de90e1.jpg
2% Revenue Growth in 2020 over 20192% Adjusted EBITDA Growth in 2020 over 2019

GAAP Net Loss 2018: $28.3M
GAAP Net Loss 2019: $37.1M
GAAP Net Loss 2020: $65.4M
A reconciliation of net income to Adjusted EBITDA is incorporated by reference in the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Non-GAAP Financial Measure and Key Operating Metrics” and included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 23, 2021.50865087
Compensation Overview
Annual Meeting Results
As part of its compensation review process, the Compensation Committee considers whether Quotient’s executive compensation program is aligned with the interests of our stockholders. In its review of Quotient’s executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee has carefully considered the approval by approximately 49% of the votes cast for Quotient’s say-on-pay vote at our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, as compared to strong approval for the prior year’s say-on-pay proposal with approximately 96% of votes cast in support of Quotient’s executive compensation program.
In response to this disappointingly low say-on-pay approval at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we performed a comprehensive review of each of our compensation programs. We also reached out to our top 25 stockholders (representing approximately 77% of our outstanding shares) in order to specifically solicit stockholder feedback regarding Quotient’s executive compensation program, among other items. Twenty percent of these stockholders accepted our invitation to provide feedback. Robert McDonald, an independent director and Chairman of the Board, along with our Chief People Officer, our General Counsel and our Investor Relations representative, participated in meetings with each of these stockholders. During
46


these meetings, these investors provided several key pieces of feedback regarding the existing executive compensation program:
Quotient should not reprice stock options without stockholder approval;
The executive compensation program should place a strong emphasis on performance-based compensation;
The peer group should be reset to reflect the Company's current profile for market capitalizing and revenue;
Performance metrics under Quotient’s executive compensation programs should be designed to preclude undesirable incentives, such as incentives to take excessive risks;
Performance conditions and other criteria for receipt of compensation should not be modified or waived in a way that benefits executives (i.e., no “moving the goal posts”); and
Mr. Boal’s severance package was above and beyond an appropriate level, for example the severance contemplated in his Change of Control agreement.
As a result of this shareholder feedback, the Compensation Committee made a number of prospective changes to its executive compensation program to address stockholder feedback and to better align the go-forward policies with the interests of Quotient’s stockholders, including:
Recommending, for Board and stockholder approval, the adoption a new equity incentive plan that is better aligned with stockholder interests and market practices, including:
Preserving, but not increasing, the number of shares currently available under the 2013 Plan;
Prohibiting the repricing of options and stock appreciation rights without stockholder approval; and
Eliminating the annual increase in the shares available under the plan (the annual evergreen).
Adjusting the criteria used to identify Quotient’s peer group for making executive compensation decisions for 2023 in order to better reflect Quotient’s current profile;
Appointing a new chairperson of the Compensation Committee, Mr. Reece, effective as of February 22, 2023;
Focusing performance-based long-term incentives on healthy revenue growth and profitability, with managed upside payouts;
Focusing annual cash incentives under the Company's Annual Incentive Plan on both profitability and revenue, with managed upside payouts, and introducing a minimum gross profit threshold condition to the attainment of the GAAP revenue goal in order to preclude the creation of undesirable incentives; and
In addition to the individual's performance, level of responsibility, time in the role, and role criticality, we use market data as an additional reference point and generally align to the 50th percentile among the Company’s peer group, with the exception of Mr. Khan, for whom the Committee has determined a higher level is appropriate due to his critical role in the Company's future growth.
Philosophy
The overall objective of our executive compensation programs is to pay our executive officers competitively and equitably in a way that aligns our business and financial goals, and ties back to overall Company and individual performance. The primary objectives of our executive compensation programs for our NEOs are:
3047



Pay-for-PerformanceA significant portion of pay for executive officers is at-risk and performance-based with metrics that align total compensation with the Company’s sustainable growth strategy and values, annual financial objectives, and performance of our stock price. At-risk compensation includes short-term cash incentives and long-term performance-based equity awards and long-term incentives in the form of equity awards.incentives.
Alignment with StockholdersOur compensation programs align executive officers’ interests with those of our stockholders, by providing equity-based forms of compensation and tying pay to Company and stock performance. We maintain stock ownership guidelines for all executive officers, and we remain committed to a culture of shared success through long-term equity awards. In response to stockholder feedback, we movedcontinued to award a portion of the 20212022 equity grant toin the form of performance-based RSUs to alignwith stringent vesting conditions. We believe the stock price vesting metrics are in alignment with stockholder interest.
Competitive AppealOur compensation programs’ goalsprograms are designed to attract, reward, and retain talented and highly qualified executive officers whose abilities and alignment to our values are critical to our success. We use market-based pay information to align each executive officer’s compensation to their position, responsibilities, and impact.
Drive Sustainable GrowthWe use our compensation programs to invest in and reward talent with the greatest potential to drive the long-term growth of our Company, while holding employees accountable to the Company’s strategy and values.
Compensation Decisions in 2020 - Key Takeaways
NEOs were held to Annual Incentive Plan performance targets that were set pre-pandemic and not adjusted even though our business performance was significantly impacted by the market contraction and challenges caused by the COVID-19 pandemic in the first half of 2020. While our business performance ended the year in a much stronger position than we expected, Mr. Boal did not earn his annual incentive payout in 2020 based on our full year performance.
For NEOs other than the CEO, our full year performance met the threshold targets necessary for those participants to earn annual incentive payouts, but the Compensation Committee followed the leadership team's recommendation and reduced their annual incentive payouts from 60% to 25% to align with the payouts approved for the non-executive Annual Incentive Plan participants.
Mr. Boal completed his first full year as CEO in 2020, after returning to the Company in August of the previous year. The Compensation Committee made adjustments to Mr. Boal's annual and long-term incentive opportunities to reflect a full year in the role and to directly link pay to performance.
In 2020, Mr. Raskin and Ms. Strayer relocated to Salt Lake City where the Company was expanding operations and where the Company intends to move its headquarters in late summer 2021. The Compensation Committee approved a one-time, taxable lump sum of $50,000 each to Mr. Raskin and Ms. Strayer to partially offset the relocation costs they incurred.
2020 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation ("Say-On-Pay")
Approximately 53% of the votes cast at the annual general meeting of stockholders were in support of the advisory resolution to approve our executive compensation program. In the prior year's vote we received over 94% support from our stockholders and as a result the core elements of the 2019 program remained unchanged in 2020. In response to the lower results of the Say-On-Pay vote in 2020, we performed a comprehensive review of our executive compensation programs. We also augmented our regular investor meetings with specific outreach on compensation to our top 20 stockholders representing approximately 74% of our outstanding shares and conducted in-depth reviews of reports from ISS and Glass Lewis, and considered analysis from Radford, our independent compensation consultant.




31


We summarize below the key concerns we discovered and the actions we have taken in response:
Stockholder ConcernsOur ResponseIntended Outcome and When Effective
Long-term incentive (“LTI”) equity awards have no quantitative performance condition.
50% of LTI awards will be subject to the achievement of challenging quantitative performance targets over a 3-year period.

Better aligns NEO rewards with long-term sustainable business performance and returns experienced by stockholders.

Long Term Incentive Plan Effective 2021
Rationale for annual incentive payouts in the context of reported business performance is not clearly explained.We have provided the specific targets and performance levels that governed earning and payouts for FY 2020.
Clear disclosure of Annual Incentive Plan mechanism and how it reflects our pay for performance philosophy.

Effective 2021
Compensation peer group contains companies of significantly larger market capitalization than Quotient.
The peer group companies used for pay decisions in 2020 were chosen based on revenue and market capitalization criteria with an emphasis on the former.
For the 2021 peer group we revised the selection of peers to exclude five companies whose market capitalization was more than four times that of Quotient at the time of the analysis and replaced them with four companies market capitalization comparable to our own that fit our criteria (please see "Revisions to Peer Group for Pay Decisions in 2021"). The Compensation Committee looks at the peer group as part of its annual review and will continue to adjust the peers as appropriate.
Peer group has been re-sized to reflect companies with similar business characteristics and of comparable size to Quotient based on updated revenue and market capitalization data.

Effective 2021
Strong Governance Practices
We DoWe Don't


ü    Review compensation programs annually with the Compensation Committee


û    Provide single trigger change inof control severance benefits


ü    Maintain robust stock ownership guidelines for all NEOs


û    Permit hedging or pledging of equity securities




ü    Emphasize long-term equity in NEO pay mix


û    Provide perquisites such as health or tax allowances




ü    Engage    Rely on the advice of an independent compensation consultant reporting directly to the Compensation Committee


û    Provide tax gross-up payments


ü    Ensure a significant portion of executive pay is "at-risk" and/or variable, dependent on company and/or stock price performance
û    On a go-forward basis, intend to allow repricing without stockholder approval (if and upon obtaining approval of a new equity incentive plan per Proposal No. 2)
ü    Use a market comparison of executive compensation against a relevant peer group
û    On a go-forward basis, intend to provide for automatic annual increases in the shares available under our equity incentive plan (if and upon obtaining approval of a new equity incentive plan per Proposal No. 2)



32


Compensation Elements
Our compensation program consists of base salary, annual incentiveincentives and long-term incentive.incentives. Each year the Compensation Committee reviews, for each NEO, the target opportunity value of each element which weof these three elements. We refer to as "Base Salary", "AIP Target Opportunity", and "LTI Opportunity". Thethe aggregate of the target opportunity value of each element we refer to as Total Direct Compensation (“TDC”). The Compensation Committee considers market practices, the criticality of the NEO's role to the business, and retention objectives as well as other factors such as company and individual performance to determine the appropriate TDC for each NEO and the mix of each element in the total. Each element is described in the table below.
48


ElementPurposeCharacteristics
Base SalaryAttract and retain talent
Fixed: 100% cash
Size reflects market benchmarking, role responsibility, experience and individual performance, and criticality to our success, and market benchmarking against our peer group
Short-Term Incentive


(Annual Incentive Plan ("AIP"))
Motivate and reward accomplishment of short-term business goals
Variable: Cash and equity100% cash
TargetAIP target payout opportunity reflects market practice expressed as % of base salary
Payouts are fully formulaic
In 2020, denominated 100% in performance restricted shares for CEO and 50% performance restricted shares and 50% cash for all other NEOs
In 2020, metrics are revenue and2022, the primary metric under the 2022 AIP was Reported Adjusted EBITDA weighted 50%-50%(in order to align with our strategystrongly incentivize performance on this metric)
Long-Term Incentive


(Long-Term Incentive Plan ("LTI"))
Motivate and reward sustainable long-term performance



Align delivered pay to returns experienced by stockholders



Attract and retain talent
Variable: 100% equity
Target opportunities areLTI opportunity is sized based on market practices, which includes benchmarking against our peer group, role responsibility, retention objectives, and individual performance
In 2020, 50% in Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) and 50% in stock options both with 4-year ratable vesting
In 2021,2022, annual LTI awards were denominated 50% in time-based RSUs and 50% in performance-based RSUs based on market best practices and aligned with stockholder feedbackinterest, emphasize performance-based component of compensation, align with governance best practices, and market trends
2022 performance-based RSUs were subject to satisfaction of challenging Company stock price hurdles.
A significant proportion of each NEOsNEO's target TDC is variable and at-risk due to its dependence on the achievement of preset, objective and quantitative performance goals in the Annual Incentive Plan and long-term incentive awards based on the long-termCompany performance, of our stock price as shown in the charts below.
The CEO pay mix is reflectivecharts below reflect the mixture of Base Salary, AIP Target Opportunities, and LTI Opportunities for Messrs. Krepsik and Boal and for each of the other NEOs, other than Mr. Boal’s total target direct compensation and Other Named Executive Officers Pay Mix is reflective of Messrs. Raskin and Summe and Mses. Strayer and Chen’s total target direct compensation.Kellerman.
chart-7e691e966b1e4e939991.jpgchart-b8010decda9b4f17b9e1.jpg30953096
(1)Compensation Pay Mix is representative of 20202022 total target compensation. Ms. Strayer did not receive a 2020 Long Term Incentive award dueTotal target compensation for Mr. Boal is reflective of his pay prior to her late 2019 new hire equity award.
(2)2020 Short Term Incentivehis resignation as CEO on May 20, 2022, and total target compensation for the CEOMr. Krepsik is valued in RSUs and for other NEOs is valued in 50% RSUs and 50% cash.
(3)2021 Long Term Incentive target for CEO and other NEOs will be denominated in 50% performance-based RSUs and 50% time-based RSUs.
33
reflective of his pay after his May 24, 2022 promotion to CEO.


How Pay Decisions Are Made
Role of the Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee regularly reviews the philosophy and goals of our executive compensation programs to ensure they align with company objectives and strategy. Typically, our CEO makes compensation
49


recommendations for NEOs and other members of the executive leadership team for consideration and approval by the Compensation Committee in Q1 each year. The CEO does not participate in recommendations nor discussions relating to his own compensation.
The Compensation Committee with the assistance of an independent consultant considers multiple factors including peer group and market survey data, company and individual performance, stockholder feedback, and judgement on what is in the best interests of the company in making recommendations on CEO pay for approval by the Board.
Peer Group
When evaluating executive compensation, the Compensation Committee reviews the pay practices and pay levels in a comparative group of companies (the “Peer Group”) of similar size and business sector to Quotient. We review the peer group annually for relevance and alignment with best practices and investor preferences. The selection criteria for inclusion in the Peer Group for TDC decisions made in early 2020 are summarized in the table below.
ElementDescriptionCriteria
Industry/SectorThe markets in which the company competes for product success and talent.
Public US-based software-as-a-service with secondary focus on marketing services.

If possible, Corporate headquarters in key technology hub locations.
RevenueTrailing Twelve Month (“TTM) revenue is within a comparable range of Quotient’s revenue.
Generally between 0.5x and 4.0x ($200M to $1.6B) of Quotient revenue.

Market CapitalizationMarket capitalization is within a comparable range of Quotient’s market capitalization.Generally between 0.5x and 4.0x ($500M to $4.0B) of Quotient market capitalization.
The peer group data analysis includes target base salary, annual incentive and long-term award values for similarly situated executives at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles.
The peer group data may also be supplemented with other relevant market data supplied by Radford that reflect companies of a similar profile as the peer group.This data is used, in addition to the peer group data to ensure a relevant sample for informing pay decisions.. The Compensation Committee looks at the peer group as part of its annual review and will continue to adjust the peers as appropriate.
The Compensation Committee approved in Q3 2019 the peer group to be used to examine executive pay levels, pay mix and pay policies for setting the go-forward program for the NEOs in 2020. Drawing from an analysis from the compensation consultant Radford, the Committee removed from the prior year's list three companies whose market capitalizations exceeded our range criterion (Coupa Software Incorporated, Etsy, and Hubspot). Mindbody Inc. was removed due to its acquisition by Vista Equity Partners.Four companies were added (8x8, Cloudera, Q2 and Rapid7) that met all the criteria.




34


The peer group companies for 2020 pay decisions are listed below. The four companies added are asterisked.
2U, Inc.Five9, Inc.Shutterstock, Inc.
8x8, Inc.*GrubHub Inc.SPS Commerce, Inc.
Benefitfocus, Inc.LivePerson, Inc.Stamps.com Inc.
Box, Inc.LogMeIn, Inc.The Trade Desk, Inc.
Carbonite, Inc.Q2 Holdings, Inc.*TrueCar, Inc.
Cloudera, Inc.*QuinStreet, Inc.Yelp Inc.
Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc.Rapid7, Inc.*
Pay Decisions
Summary
The table below summarizes the changes made to each NEOs target compensation in 2020 relative to 2019.
Considerations
Steven Boal
Increase in short-term incentive opportunity
Reflective of move from Chairman to full-time CEO role
Maintaining market-competitiveness
Scott RaskinNo change in total target cash compensation
Pam Strayer
No change in total target cash compensation
No long-term incentive award
Hired in late 2019 with market-driven new hire equity award
Connie Chen
Modest increase in base pay
Recognition of strong individual performance
In consideration of internal pay equity and market-competitiveness
Chad SummeNo change in total target cash compensation
Annual Incentive Pay Decisions
The leadership team delivered strong performance in 2020 by continuing to execute in the face of a severe market contraction and challenges in the first half of the year due to COVID-19. Revenue and Adjusted EBITDA grew 13% and 40% respectively in the second half of the year. The performance targets governing annual incentive awards were established in February pre-pandemic and were not adjusted during the year.
The performance attainment requirements to fund an incentive payout to our CEO were more stringent than for other participants. Our full year performance did not meet required achievement and therefore no annual incentive payout was earned by Mr. Boal.
For NEOs other than the CEO, our full year performance met the threshold necessary to fund payouts, but following a recommendation from the leadership team, the Compensation Committee reduced the formulaic payout from 60% to 25% to align with the payout approved for non-executive Annual Incentive Plan participants. The payout approved for the general population followed a decision made by the leadership team in Q2 to suspend the normal operation of the plan in response to the COVID market contraction. This decision enabled the Company to avoid employee layoffs and other adverse employment actions while delivering sustainable financial performance.
Compensation Elements
Base Salary
Base salary is the only element of compensation that is fixed. Our goal is to provide base salary compensation that is market competitive in comparison with roles of similar size and business decision authority in our industry. The Compensation Committee reviews each NEO’s base salary annually considering market comparisons, prevailing market conditions, role scope, individual experience and performance, and internal equity.
35


The 2020 base salary of each NEO is listed in the table below.
Named Executive OfficerBase Salary as of December 31, 2019Base Salary as of December 31, 2020% Change
Steven Boal$500,000 $500,000 — %
Scott Raskin$450,000 $450,000 — %
Pam Strayer$450,000 $450,000 — %
Connie Chen$350,000 $375,000 %
Chad Summe$330,000 $375,000 14 %
Annual Incentive Plan
Purpose
The purpose of the Annual Incentive Plan is to:
motivate and reward accomplishment of short-term business goals;
align executive focus on balanced Revenue and Adjusted EBIDTA results.
Metrics
At the beginning of 2020, the Board, following a recommendation from the Compensation Committee, approved the plan’s metrics and the performance targets that governed payouts.
The Committee selected revenue and Adjusted EBITDA1(see note below for definition) metrics, weighted equally.
The Committee believes that this selection provided the appropriate balance of growth and profitability as the short-term focus for the executive team and was well aligned with investor priorities.
Performance targets were established for each metric that were intended to be aggressive yet achievable, with focus and strong execution. The targets were set to align with the annual operating plan and the full year guidance provided in Q1 2020.The pre-pandemic targets were not changed even in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and its significant impact our customers, retailer partners, and our business.
NEO AIP Target Opportunities
The Compensation Committee established the incentive opportunity at target for each NEO based in part on the market practices of similarly situated companies, the criticality of the role to the company in the context of internal peer comparisons as well as the overall total direct compensation objectives for the business. In developing the plan and the targets, the company considered the cost of the plan as well as the above factors. The target is expressed as a percentage of base salary as outlined below.
NEO2019 Target Incentive as % of base salary2020 Target Incentive as % of base salary
Steven Boal(1)
75%100%
Scott Raskin100%100%
Pam Strayer75%
Connie Chen60%60%
Chad Summe75%75%
(1)Mr. Boal's incentive opportunity was increased in 2020 to reflect his return to the role of CEO. His target incentive is consistent with the target incentive for the prior CEO.
As in the prior year, in order to align CEO compensation to stockholder results, the Compensation Committee resolved to denominate all of Mr. Boal's incentive opportunity in equity ("Equity Bonus Award") in the form of performance restricted stock units ("PRSUs").
1 The Compensation Committee recommended and the Board approved revenue and Adjusted EBITDA as the corporate financial performance measures that supported our annual operating plan. We define (i) “revenue” as GAAP revenue as reflected in our quarterly and annual financial statements; and (ii) “Adjusted EBITDA” as net income (loss) adjusted for stock-based compensation, depreciation and amortization, interest expense, other income (expense) net, provision for (benefit from) income taxes, net change in fair value of escrowed shares and contingent consideration, Enterprise Resources Planning Software implementation costs, charges related to certain acquisition related costs, impairment of capitalized software development costs and restructuring charges, and as applicable, other special items.
36


For other NEOs, 50% of the target incentive opportunity was denominated in Equity Bonus Awards, in the form of PRSUs, and 50% was denominated in cash.
The number of PRSUs granted under the Equity Bonus Awards was determined using our closing stock price as of February 28, 2020. PRSUs would vest as shares on March 1, 2021 provided the Threshold Company Blended Performance was achieved. Payouts for Company Achievement above threshold would be delivered in additional shares in the case of Mr. Boal and in cash in the case of the other NEOs, using the payout scale outlinedbelow.
Plan Formula
As noted above, normal operation of the Annual Incentive Plan was suspended for non-executive plan participants to support business continuity and avoid adverse employee impact in response to the market contraction caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
At the start of the year, the Compensation Committee approved the goals and performance levels to be evaluated under the plan. Revenue and Adjusted EBITDA are considered key to the underlying health of the business and aligned with long-term stockholder success. Achievement in each metric is assessed and expressed as a percentage of the target, weighted equally (50% for each metric). At the end of the year, performance is evaluated against the pre-established goals. The Compensation Committee believes that this formula provides the optimum balance for driving equal focus on growth and profitability and to focus on balanced decision making.
The plan payout is derived through combined metric performance using an average of both metric percentages, called blended performance. Under blended performance attainment, for NEOs, other than the CEO, both metrics together must achieve an average threshold of 75% to fund incentive payout. The blended performance percentage results are correlated to a payout scale to determine the final payout against plan.
For the CEO, each individual metric must achieve a minimum performance threshold of 80% for any award to be earned. Final award payout is then determined by a correlated payout scale of blended performance percentage results, in a similar manner to all other NEOs. Due to final achievement results, the CEO did not earn an award under the plan in 2020.
The following tables summarize the performance – payout formula as it would have applied in 2020.
Actual 2020 AIP Performance Achievement

Metric

Target
$M

Actual Achievement

Weight
%
Weighted Achievement
%
$M%
Revenue49544690.1%50%45.0%
Adjusted EBITDA664669.8%50%34.9%
Blended Performance79.9%

2020 AIP Performance Payout Scale
CEOOther NEOs
MilestonePerformance %Payout %Performance %Payout %
Maximum130%160%125%150%
Target100%100%100%100%
Threshold(1)    
80%60%75%50%
(1)Payout for CEO under the plan requires each individual performance metric to achieve a minimum performance threshold of 80%.
Payouts are increased or reduced by 2 percentage points for each percentage point of Blended Performance above or below target respectively.



37


Actual Annual Incentive Payouts
No annual incentive payout was funded for Mr. Boal because the plan did not achieve the required minimum level of threshold performance.
For the NEOs, other than the CEO, the Annual Incentive Plan would have funded at 60% as outlined in the original plan design. At the recommendation of the leadership team, the Compensation Committee reduced this payout to 25% to align with the approved payout to the non-executive employee population.
As noted above, the payout approved for the non-executive employee population followed a decision made by the leadership team in Q2, and with support of the Compensation Committee and the Board, to suspend the normal operation of the plan to mount a response to the COVID market contraction and challenges. This decision enabled the Company to avoid employee layoffs and other adverse employment actions while delivering sustainable financial performance.
The NEO payout awards were denominated in shares in accordance with the plan design described above and as outlined in the following table.
NameTarget Opportunity
$
Payout
# Shares
Value of Payout Shares
$
Steven Boal500,000
Scott Raskin450,00012,569176,720
Pam Strayer337,5009,427132,544
Connie Chen225,0006,28488,353
Chad Summe (1)
281,250
(1)No annual incentive awards were payable to Mr. Summe as he departed from the company before the awards were earned.
Long-Term Incentive Plan ("LTI")
Purpose
LTI awards are denominated 100% in equity to:
motivate and reward sustainable long-term performance;
align delivered long-term pay with the returns experienced by stockholders; and
attract and retain talent.
NEO Target Opportunities
Historically, we have granted our executive officers time-vested stock options and RSUs in connection with their employment. The values of equity awards are based on annual performance and retention objectives. When determining the size of the awards, our Compensation Committee considers the executive’s position and responsibilities, their equity holdings, potential incentive and retention value, competitive market data, the anticipated future contribution the executive will make to our success, and internal pay equity. Equity awards also serve the purpose of ensuring that executives’ long-term interests are aligned with stockholders’ interests.
Generally, all equity awards granted by the Compensation Committee have the grant date and vesting commencement date of the first of the month following approval. All annual grants of RSUs vest quarterly over four years from vesting commencement date and all grants of options vest monthly over four years from vesting commencement date. All new hire grants of RSUs will vest ¼ after one year and then vest quarterly over the following three years and all new hire grants of options will vest ¼ after one year and then vest quarterly over the following three years.
The Compensation Committee believes that the option to purchase shares of our common stock, with an exercise price equal to the market price of the common stock on the date of grant, are inherently performance-based and are a good tool to motivate our executive officers to build stockholder value. In addition, the Compensation Committee believes that RSUs help stabilize retention during periods of stock price volatility. All equity awards to our executive officers are subject to our Stock Ownership Guidelines.
38


The Compensation Committee established opportunity targets for each NEO based on a review of market benchmarks, individual performance, current equity holdings, dilution relative to market practice, and total direct compensation mix.
Equity awards granted in 2020 were denominated 50% in time-based stock options and 50% in time-based RSUs. The Compensation Committee believed that this represented an appropriate balance of (i) risk based on the performance of our stock price for stockholder alignment and (ii) retention value for participants.
The table below shows the total shares and approximate grant date fair value of each grant.
2020 LTI NEO Grants
NameRSUsStock OptionsTotal LTIV%Comment
$,000#$,000#$,000
Steven Boal2,000223,4632,000469,4614,000+33%To reflect full-year in CEO role
Scott Raskin1,625181,5641,625381,4373,250-59%2019 value included one-time new hire awards
Pam StrayerNANo award in 2020 due to recency of new hire grant in November 2019
Connie Chen60067,039600140,8381,200—%
Chad Summe42547,48642599,760850-53%
2021 Compensation Changes In Response To Stockholder Feedback
Following its review of the executive compensation program, long-term business strategy and in direct response to stockholder feedback from stockholders, the Compensation Committee approved the following changes effective for 2021.
The changes are not reflected this year but will be reported in the 2022 Proxy Statement.
Revisions to Peer Group for Pay Decisions in 2021
In accordance with our normal practice the Compensation Committee reviewed in July 2020 a peer group analysis from its compensation consultant Radford to support pay decisions in 2021. Feedback from stockholders was included in the review. As a result, the Compensation Committee adjusted revenue and market capitalization criteria in order to narrow scope of comparators better aligned to Quotient industry and financial metrics. They also removed five companies which, while they met our revenue and competitive industry criteria, exceeded the newmarket capitalization maximum criterion for inclusion. The Compensation Committee added four companies whose characteristics met all criteria at the time of the review.
Revised Peer Group Criteria for Pay Decisions in 2021
ElementDescriptionCurrent Criteria2021 Criteria
RevenueTrailing Twelve Month (“TTM) revenue is within a comparable range of Quotient’s revenue.
Generally between 0.5x and 4.0x ($200M to $1.6B) of Quotient revenue.

Generally between 0.5x and 3.7x ($300M to $1.6B) of Quotient revenue.
Market CapitalizationMarket capitalization is within a comparable range of Quotient’s market capitalization.Generally between 0.5x and 4.0x ($500M to $4.0B) of Quotient market capitalization.
Generally between 0.5x and 4.0x($300M to $3.0B) of Quotient market capitalization.




39


Revised Peer Group for Pay Decisions in 2021
2U, Inc.LivePersonStamps.com Inc.
8x8QADTripAdvisor
Benefitfocus, IncQuinStreetTrueCar, Inc.
Box, Inc.Rapid7Workiva
ClouderaShutterstock, Inc.Yelp Inc.
Cornerstone OnDemandSPS Commerce, IncZuora
Companies removed in 2020Companies added in 2020
Five9, Inc.QAD
Grubhub Inc.TripAdvisor
LogMeinWorkiva
Q2Zuora
The Trade Desk
Annual Incentive Plan 2021
Revenue and Reported Adjusted EBITDA weighted equally will continue as the plan metrics given the alignment to the business strategy and as an appropriate balance to manage growth and investment for the business.
NEOs, including the CEO, will be subject to the same funding model applicable as all bonus-eligible employees. The Compensation Committee believes that this adjustment is important to reinforce the Company's cultural message of unity of purpose. A Blended Performance of 75% to target is required to fund payouts with payouts capped at 125% of target.
The revenue performance scale above and below target were narrowed such that threshold and maximum milestones are approximately 93% and 107% respectively, corresponding to funding levels of 75% and 125% respectively. The Compensation Committee believes that this modification, in combination with the reduced payout maximums, represents a more prudent methodology to measure the revenue component by requiring higher performance to trigger funding while appropriately rewarding above target performance.
With the introduction of performance-based equity awards in the Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTI plan), the Compensation Committee removed PRSUs from the Annual Incentive Plan. Payouts will be denominated 100% in cash in the 2021 plan.
LTI Changes Introduced in 2021
Following its comprehensive review of executive compensation programs in 2020 in response to stockholder feedback, the Compensation Committee made the following changes to the Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTI plan).
While the Compensation Committee believes that stock options are inherently performance-based it acknowledged, based on its review of stockholder feedback, that the performance characteristics of the LTI plan would be enhanced by attaching quantitative performance conditions to the earning of awards. Therefore, for 2021, a portion of LTI equity awards, formerly denominated in stock options, will be granted as performance-based restricted stock units ("PSUs").
Fifty percent of each NEO’s grant will be subject to the company achieving two quantitative performance objectives over a three-year cliff period. The Committee selected gross margin dollars combined with a stock price modifier as the metrics that will govern payouts. The three-year targets are aggressive, but achievable, with great effort and focus by our NEOs. These metrics were selected to align with the three-year financial plan.
40


Fifty percent of each grant will be an RSU subject to time-based-restriction with a four-year ratable vest consistent with the 2020 policy.
chart-f214a68f99ce41a9b0f1.jpgchart-ddea46881285417298b1.jpg
Compensation Committee Role
The Compensation Committee regularly reviews the philosophy and goals of our executive compensation programs to ensure they align with company objectives and strategy. Typically, our CEO makes compensation recommendations for NEOs and other direct reports for approval by the Compensation Committee. The CEO does not participate in recommendations noror discussions relating to his own compensation.
At the beginning of 2022, our then-current CEO made compensation recommendations for then-current NEOs other than the CEO, including Messrs. Krepsik and Raskin as well as Mses. Strayer and Chen, for consideration and approval by the Compensation Committee in Q1 of 2022, and also made recommendations to the Board regarding compensation to be provided to Mr. Khan and Mr. Kellerman in connection with their commencement of service as Chief Financial Officer and interim Chief Financial Officer, respectively.
The Compensation Committee, with the assistance of an independent consultant, considers multiple factors including market data from a defined peer group, broader survey data reflecting companies of a similar profile, company and individual performance, stockholder feedback, and judgementthe judgment of its experienced members on what is in the best interests of the companyCompany in making recommendations on CEO pay for approval by the Board.
The Compensation Committee follows a robust annual cycle to plan and review philosophy, goals, and execution of our executive compensation programs to ensure they align with company objectives and strategy. Highlights from our annual schedule are outlined in the below table.
TimingFocus Areas
Q1
Evaluated business performance and financial metrics for the prior fiscal year under the Annual Incentive Plan (AIP)
Discussed individual contributions, performance, and future potential of NEOs to determine compensation adjustments and overall pay mix targets
Finalized updated 2022 Long-Term Incentive Program ("LTI Program") design for NEOs
Aligned on performance measures, targets, and plan design for the 2022 AIP and any performance-based equity metrics
Q2
Approved new compensation structure for Mr. Krepsik in connection with his promotion to CEO
Approved retention packages for Mr. Raskin and Ms. Chen
Approved adjustments to Quotient's non-employee director compensation program
Q3
Reviewed and discussed usage of equity incentive compensation for non-NEOs and monitored ongoing dilution
Discussed plans for putting forward a new equity plan in 2023 and beyond
Q4
Reviewed annual meeting results including results of "say-on-pay" advisory vote from stockholders
Engaged in outreach to shareholders to seek their input on our executive compensation practices
Discussed modifications to the Company's compensation program in response to shareholder feedback
Approved Company peer group to be used for the 2023 executive compensation decisions
Discussed progress against equity budget, equity strategy and approach for 2023 and beyond
Role of the Independent Compensation Committee Consultant
The Compensation Committee has retained RadfordAon as an independent consultant reporting directly to the Compensation Committee, to assist in providing market data, analysis and advice on executive and director compensation, and related governance matters as an independent advisor. Radfordmatters. Aon and its affiliates did not provide any services to Quotient in 20202022 other than executive and director compensation consulting for the Compensation Committee.
The Compensation Committee determined that Radford and its lead consultant for Quotient satisfyAon satisfied the independence factors specified in the NYSE listing rules. The Committee also determined that the work performed by RadfordAon in 20202022 did not raise any conflict of interest.
Peer Group
When evaluating executive compensation, the Compensation Committee reviews the pay practices and pay levels in a comparative group of companies of similar size and business sector to Quotient. We review the
50


peer group annually for relevance and alignment with best practices and investor preferences. The peer group and the compensation assessment is just one input into the Company’s policy setting and pay decisions that is considered by the Compensation Committee. The selection criteria for inclusion in the 2022 peer group are summarized in the table below.
ElementDescriptionCriteria
Industry/SectorThe markets in which the Company competes for product success and talent.
Public US-based software-as-a-service companies, marketing services companies, and interactive media & services companies.

If possible, companies with corporate headquarters in key technology hub locations.
RevenueTrailing Twelve Month ("TTM") revenue is within a range that is comparable to Quotient’s revenue.
Generally between 0.5x to 3.7x ($300M to $2.0B) of Quotient revenue.

Market CapitalizationMarket capitalization is within a range that is comparable to Quotient’s market capitalization.
Generally between 0.5x to 4.0x($500M to $4.1B) of Quotient market capitalization.
Other qualitative factors that were considered in selecting the relevant peer group include organizational complexity, time since an initial public offering, location of senior leaders and/or other key roles, and overall headcount. The peer group data analysis includes target base salary, annual incentive and long-term award values for similarly situated executives at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles. In selecting the peer companies, the Compensation Committee tries to place the Company at or near the median or 50th percentile for revenue as a proxy for business scale given market volatility in valuations. At the time that the peer group was approved, the Company was at the 48th percentile for revenue.
The peer group data may also be supplemented with other relevant market data supplied by the Compensation Consultant that reflect companies of a similar profile as the peer group from broader survey data.This data is used, in addition to the peer group data, to ensure a relevant sample for informing pay decisions. The Compensation Committee looks at the peer group as part of its annual review and will continue to adjust the peers as appropriate. While market data is provided to the Compensation Committee as background information, it is just one input into how pay decisions are made given the importance of company specific factors such as role criticality, experience in the role, performance and future potential.
In the third quarter of 2021, the Compensation Committee approved the peer group to be used to examine executive pay levels, pay mix and pay policies in connection with setting the go-forward program for the NEOs in 2022. After considering the recommendations of the Compensation Consultant, the Compensation Committee ultimately decided to retain the same peer group used in 2021 for 2022 compensation decisions.
The peer group companies for 2022 pay decisions are listed below.
2U, Inc.LivePerson, Inc.Stamps.com Inc.
8x8, Inc.QAD Inc.TripAdvisor, Inc.
Benefitfocus, Inc.QuinStreet, Inc.TrueCar, Inc.
Box, Inc.Rapid7, Inc.Workiva Inc.
Cloudera, Inc.Shutterstock, Inc.Yelp Inc.
Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc.SPS Commerce, Inc.Zuora, Inc.
As described below under "Revisions to Peer Group for Pay Decisions in 2023", the Compensation Committee approved the use of a modified peer group for 2023 compensation decisions based upon feedback from the Compensation Consultant and from our stockholders.
Compensation Elements
51


Base Salary
Base pay is fixed compensation delivered in return for day-to-day job responsibilities, leadership skills and experience. Our goal is to provide base salary compensation that is market competitive in comparison with roles of similar size and business-decision authority in our industry. Market competitive base pay helps to attract and retain executive talent. The Compensation Committee reviews each NEO’s base salary annually considering market comparisons, prevailing market conditions, role scope, individual experience and performance, and internal equity.
During the annual compensation review process, the Compensation Committee approved no change in base salary for any of Messrs. Krepsik, Raskin or Boal, or Mses. Chen or Strayer.
Later in the year, in connection with Mr. Krepsik’s promotion to the position of Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee approved an increase in his base salary to $500,000 in order to reflect the increase in responsibilities, effective as of his assumption of that role. In addition, in connection with Mr. Khan’s commencement of employment as Chief Financial Officer of Quotient in July 2022, the Compensation Committee approved a base salary of $460,000, based upon the Committee’s review of market data, internal comparables, competitive assessment of the role, candidate experience, and recommendations from the Compensation Consultant.
Named Executive OfficerBase Salary as of December 31, 2021
Base Salary as of December 31, 2022(2)
% Change
Matthew Krepsik$375,000 $500,000 33 %
Scott Raskin$465,000 $465,000 — %
Yuneeb Khan$— $460,000 — %
Connie Chen$380,000 $380,000 — %
Steven Boal$500,000 $500,000 — %
Pamela Strayer$450,000 $450,000 — %
John Kellerman (1)
$316,200 $338,000 %
(1)Mr. Kellerman received a merit increase in base salary from $316,200 to $338,000 effective on April 1, 2022 in conjunction with his Chief Accounting Officer role. He received no base pay compensation change for his interim Chief Financial Officer role.
(2)Messrs. Boal and Kellerman, and Ms. Strayer's, base salary is as of the last date of their employment with the Company.
Annual Incentive Plan
We provide a cash-based incentive plan, or AIP, that is directly tied to achievement of financial goals that are predefined, objective, and considered to be stretch goals at the time of approval. The cash-based incentive plan is based on our annual performance and is designed to motivate and reward our NEOs and other AIP-eligible employees for achieving short-term performance objectives. We believe this program supports our “pay-for-performance” culture. In designing the 2022 AIP, the Compensation Committee approved certain modifications from the 2021 AIP in order to enhance and strengthen the focus on adjusted EBITDA, while also incentivizing Company growth through a secondary revenue metric (see a more detailed description of the use of these metrics under the 2022 AIP below).
Setting Target Payout Opportunities Under the 2022 AIP
Target payout opportunities under the 2022 AIP were expressed as a percentage of the NEO’s annual base salary. During the annual compensation review process in the first quarter of 2022, the Compensation Committee approved no change in target payout opportunities for any of Mr. Krepsik, Mr. Raskin, Ms. Chen, Ms. Strayer or Mr. Boal, as compared to the 2021 AIP target payout opportunities.
In May 2022, in connection with Mr. Krepsik’s appointment as Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee approved an increase in his target payout opportunity under the 2022 AIP from 75% to 100% of annual base salary in order to reflect this increase in responsibilities, effective as of his assumption of that role. In addition, in connection with Mr. Khan’s commencement of employment as Chief Financial Officer of Quotient in July 2022, the Compensation Committee approved a target payout opportunity under the 2022 AIP equal to 75% of annual base salary, based upon the Committee’s review of market data, internal comparables, competitive assessment of the role, candidate experience, and recommendation from the Compensation Consultant.
2022 AIP Pay for Performance Alignment
52


The Compensation Committee established the following performance metrics and payout levels under the 2022 AIP for the NEOs, which goals were approved by the Compensation Committee in February 2022.
Payouts under the 2022 AIP are calculated based upon achievement of a primary metric, Reported Adjusted EBITDA, and a “modifier metric,” Reported Revenue2. Under the 2022 AIP, the threshold, target, and maximum performance targets with respect to the Reported Adjusted EBITDA and Reported Revenue metrics were as follows:
ThresholdTargetMaximum
Reported Adjusted EBITDA(1)
$37M$49M$61M
Reported Revenue(2)
$323M$351M$379M
(1)For Mr. Kellerman only, due to his position at the time of plan approval, a threshold of $25M, target of $49M, and maximum of $61M.
(2)For Mr. Kellerman only, due to his position at the time of plan approval, a threshold of $295M, target of $351M, and maximum of $379M.
With a focus on at-risk compensation for our most senior officers, the threshold goals shown above were set at a higher level than those set for employees who were not members of our executive leadership team, which group included Mr. Kellerman who was not a member of the executive leadership team at the time the targets were set. Senior officers, including each of our NEOs other than Mr. Kellerman, would need to achieve 75% of the target metrics to earn any payout under the plan. Pursuant to the terms of 2022 AIP applicable to Mr. Kellerman (and other non-executive-leadership team members), the Company would need to achieve 50% of the target metrics in order for Mr. Kellerman to earn any payout under the plan. For non-executive employees, including Mr. Kellerman due to his position at the time of plan approval, the Compensation Committee subsequently approved paying out the 2022 AIP at the 25% of target opportunity level for retention and morale purposes in light of the significant transformation the Company was undergoing. As discussed below, Mr. Kellerman did not receive a payout under the 2022 AIP because his employment terminated before the end of 2022.
The purpose of the modifier metric is to increase or decrease the payout under the 2022 AIP to the extent the level of Reported Adjusted EBITDA achievement approaches the target level of achievement under the plan. This allows for a more narrow payout closer to the EBITDA target and faster acceleration or deceleration as results are further away from the target, further reinforcing the pay for performance intent of the AIP. In order to accomplish this, the weight of the modifier metric under the 2022 AIP increases incrementally between threshold and target achievement of the Reported Adjusted EBITDA goal as set forth below.
Achievement of Reported Adjusted EBITDA Target75% or below80%85%90%95%100% -125%
Weight of Reported Adjusted EBITDA Performance100%90%80%70%60%50%
Weight of Reported Revenue Performance0%10%20%30%40%50%
Under the 2022 AIP, the final plan achievement is equal to the greater of (i) the level of achievement calculated using both Reported Adjusted EBITDA performance and Reported Revenue Performance, weighted as set forth above, or (ii) the level of achievement calculated based only upon Reported Adjusted EBITDA, weighted at 100%.
Once the final plan achievement number has been calculated, payouts under the 2022 AIP are then determined based on the “Executive Plan Funding” level, as illustrated in the table below (with percentages interpolated linearly between these points). The Executive Plan Funding levels are intended to provide executive officers with a steeper payout curve to the extent performance levels are more than 10% above or below the target level of performance. This Executive Plan Funding modifier did not apply to Mr. Kellerman's 2022 AIP benefit due to his non-executive leadership position at the time of plan approval.
2 For purposes of the 2022 AIP, the Company defines (i) “Reported Adjusted EBITDA” as net income (loss) as reflected in our quarterly and annual financial statements, adjusted for stock-based compensation, depreciation and amortization, interest expense, other (income) expense net, provision for (benefit from) income taxes, change in fair value of contingent consideration, impairment of certain long-lived and right-of-use assets, litigation settlements, restructuring charges, shareholder activism response costs, certain business transformation and strategic initiatives costs, impairment of certain intangible assets, a loss contingency/settlement related to a contract dispute, certain acquisition related costs, and as applicable, other special items, .and (ii) “Reported Revenue” as GAAP revenue as reflected in our quarterly and annual financial statements.
53


Final Plan Achievement (%)<707580859095100105110115120125>125
Executive Plan Funding level (as a percentage of target)05067819095100105110119133150150

2022 AIP Results and Payouts
The Company’s Reported Adjusted EBITDA, as measured under the 2022 AIP, was $14.9M, while the Company’s Reported Revenue was $288.8M. Based upon these results, the Compensation Committee determined that the final plan achievement fell below the minimum threshold payout level for each of the then-serving NEOs. Accordingly, no bonus was paid under the AIP to the then-serving NEOs for the 2022 plan year. Mr. Kellerman was not eligible to receive a payment under the AIP due to his resignation of employment.
The table below sets forth the 2022 AIP target payout opportunities and payouts to each of our NEOs based upon 2022 performance:
NEOTarget Payout Opportunity (as % of Base Salary)2022 AIP Payout
Matthew Krepsik100%$0
Scott Raskin100%$0
Yuneeb Khan75%$0
Connie Chen60%$0
Steven Boal100%$0
Pamela Strayer75%$0
John Kellerman40%$0
Long-Term Incentive Program
Under our Long-term Incentive (LTI) program, the Compensation Committee awards long-term equity incentive awards to our NEOs, the purpose of which is to:
motivate and reward sustainable long-term performance;
align delivered long-term pay with the returns experienced by stockholders; and
attract and retain talent.
For 2022, the annual long-term incentive grants under the 2022 LTI Program were delivered in the form of restricted stock units subject to (i) time-based and (ii) performance-based vesting conditions ("RSUs" and "PSUs", respectively), with the following key elements to drive Company performance and align with stockholder interests:
RSUs
50% of target long-term incentive opportunity
Ratable quarterly time-based vesting over a four-year period
PSUs
50% of target long-term incentive opportunity
Three-year performance period ending on March 1, 2025
Performance-based vesting conditions satisfied with respect to 1/3 of PSUs subject to award based upon achievement of stock price hurdles $9.735, $12.98, and $16.225
If a stock price hurdle is achieved in the first year (or, in the case of Mr. Khan, first seven months) of the performance period, then in alignment with long-term incentive intent, 50% of earned shares will be subject to further vesting conditions
2022 LTI Program Pay for Performance Alignment
54


For 2022, as described above, for each NEO other than Mr. Kellerman, 50% of the LTI awards granted to the NEOs pursuant to the Company’s annual LTI award program were granted in the form of RSUs, while the other 50% were granted in the form of PSUs.
The Compensation Committee awarded 50% of the 2022 LTI awards in the form of RSUs to provide a retention vehicle to address ongoing stock price volatility during a period of organizational change and transformation of the business. The Compensation Committee granted 50% in PSUs that have value if and only to the extent that the pre-established Company stock price hurdles have been met. The Compensation Committee selected Company stock price as the sole performance metric applicable to the 2022 LTI PSU awards in order to strongly align NEO interests and compensation with the returns experienced by stockholders. The Compensation Committee designed the PSU stock price hurdles to be challenging, but achievable with strong performance.
Under the 2022 PSU awards, a stock price hurdle will be met, and one third of the units thereunder will become vested, on the last day of any period of 20 consecutive trading days during the performance period ending on March 1, 2025 during which the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE equals or exceeds the stock price hurdle, subject to the NEO’s continuous service through such date except as otherwise provided in the PSU award agreement – see Potential Payments upon Termination, Change of Control or Certain Other Events below for further details. However, if a stock price hurdle is met within the first year of the date of grant, then 50% of the units which would otherwise vest on such date will instead vest on the first anniversary of the date the stock price hurdle is met to reinforce long-term performance, performance sustainability, and avoid focus on short-term outcomes.
Setting Award Levels Under the 2022 LTI Program
The Compensation Committee determined the size of the target award granted to each NEO based on a review of the market data provided by the Compensation Consultant, individual performance, the criticality of the role in the strategic re-alignment of the business, current equity holdings, dilution relative to market practice, and total direct compensation objectives.
The table below shows the approximate grant date fair value of the PSU and RSU grants approved by the Compensation Committee under the 2022 LTI Program, as well as the number of shares of Company common stock which the NEO is eligible to receive upon vesting of such grant.
2022 LTI NEO Grants
Name
RSUs(1)
PSUs(2)
Total LTI
$#$#$
Matthew Krepsik1,053,000162,2491,053,000162,2502,106,000
Scott Raskin1,400,000215,7161,400,000215,7162,800,000
Yuneeb Khan1,350,000470,3831,350,000470,3832,700,000
Connie Chen750,000115,562750,000115,5621,500,000
Steven Boal2,500,000385,2082,500,000385,2085,000,000
Pamela Strayer1,350,000208,0121,350,000208,0122,700,000
(1)The Compensation Committee approved equity awards under the 2022 LTI Program for the executive officers (other than Mr. Kellerman) with a fixed grant date dollar value. The number of units granted subject to the PSU and RSU was determined by dividing the approved dollar value by the closing stock price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date, which was August 1, 2022 for Mr. Khan ($2.87) and March 1, 2022 ($6.49) in the case of all other NEOs who received awards under the 2022 LTI Program.
(2)This table reflects the number of shares of Company common stock payable to the NEOs with respect to the PSU awards based upon satisfaction of all three applicable stock price hurdles. Due to the rules for how the grant date fair value of the long-term incentive awards must be calculated for GAAP accounting purposes, the 2022 Summary Compensation Table does not reflect the same PSU values as this table. PSUs shown here are also not reflective of actual payout amounts, which will still be determined based upon the satisfaction of stock price hurdles prior to the conclusion of the specific measurement period. Actual payout may be less than what is illustrated here, depending on the satisfaction of the applicable stock price hurdles.
2021 PSU and 2022 PSU Performance
For the 2021 LTI Program, the shares eligible to be earned under the PSU plan by our NEOs is trending below threshold. The 2022 PSUs relating to the 2022 LTI Program are currently tracking below threshold. Therefore, no shares have been earned or vested. This represented the alignment of pay and performance during these specific periods.
55


Additional LTI Awards for NEOs During 2022
In addition to the LTI program awards granted to the NEOs as part of Quotient’s annual award program as described above, certain NEOs received additional LTI awards during 2022 as set forth below, either as a result of hirings or promotions or for ongoing retention as key leaders in the business responsible for running key functions aligned with our strategy. With the departure of Mr. Boal as CEO, stability and retention of the leadership team became a primary interest of the Compensation Committee.
Matthew Krepsik: In connection with his promotion to the position of CEO, effective June 1, 2022, Mr. Krepsik received (i) a grant of 600,000 stock options, with a four-year vesting schedule pursuant to which 1/48 of the shares vest on the first day of each month after the grant date, and (ii) a grant of 300,000 RSUs, with a four-year vesting schedule pursuant to 6.25% of the RSUs vest on each three-month anniversary of the grant date, in each case subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date; except that in the case of the RSU grant, upon Mr. Krepsik's termination of employment as a result of death that occurs more than one year from the grant date, the RSU award will fully vest.
Scott Raskin and Connie Chen: In order to promote retention of Mr. Raskin and Ms. Chen following Mr. Boal’s departure from the Company, at a time of Company vulnerability with respect to preserving existing commercial relationships and maintaining leadership coherence amid surrounding uncertainty, the Compensation Committee approved the following grants, effective July 1, 2022: (i) grants of stock option awards to each of Mr. Raskin and Ms. Chen in an amount of 375,000 and 150,000 shares, respectively, each subject to a four-year vesting schedule pursuant to which 1/48 of the shares vest on the first of each month after the grant date, and (ii) grants of RSU awards to Mr. Raskin and Ms. Chen in an amount of 178,500 and 75,000 shares, respectively, each of which has a four-year vesting schedule pursuant to 6.25% of the RSUs will vest on each three-month anniversary of the vesting commencement date, in each case, subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date; except that in the case of the RSU grants, upon the executive's termination of employment as a result of death that occurs more than one year from the grant date, the RSU award will fully vest.
Yuneeb Khan: In connection with his hiring, Mr. Khan received a sign-on grant of RSUs with a grant date fair value of $1,500,000, which RSUs are subject to a four-year vesting schedule pursuant to which 25% of the units become vested on the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date (August 1, 2022), and 6.25% of the units will become vested on each three-month anniversary thereafter, subject to continued employment through each applicable vesting date; except that in the case of the RSU grant, upon Mr. Khan's termination of employment as a result of death that occurs more than one year from the grant date, the RSU award will fully vest.
John Kellerman: In connection with his appointment to the position of interim Chief Financial Officer, effective May 1, 2022, Mr. Kellerman received a grant of 10,000 RSUs, which were subject to vesting in full on December 31, 2022, subject to Mr. Kellerman’s continuous employment through that date. As noted above, Mr. Kellerman did not receive any grants under the 2022 LTI Program.
As noted above, certain of these additional LTI awards were provided in the form of stock options. Each of these stock options was granted with an exercise price equal to the closing stock price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Because stock options will have value only if the value of Quotient’s stock increases following the grant date, the Compensation Committee believes that grants of stock options provide a strong link between executive pay and stockholder returns.
2023 Compensation and Policy Changes
Following its review of the executive compensation program and the Company's long-term business strategy, and in careful response to feedback from stockholders, the Compensation Committee approved certain changes described below effective for 2023. Because these changes went into effect in 2023, their impact will not be reflected herein; rather, their impact will be reflected in the 2024 proxy statement.
Clawback Policy
In June 2023, we adopted a recoupment (or “clawback”) policy that applies to incentive compensation paid to current and certain former executive officers that was based on incorrect financial performance measures.Under the policy, if we are required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of any financial reporting requirement under applicable securities laws, the Compensation Committee is required to cause us to recoup from each executive officer who was employed during the three preceding fiscal years the excess of the incentive compensation received by the executive officer during such
56


three-year period, based on the erroneous financial information, over the incentive compensation that would have been received by the executive if it had been calculated based on the restated financial information.The policy is intended to comply with the requirements of Securities and Exchange Commission rules and NYSE listing standards implementing Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, and will be amended to the extent required to reflect the final NYSE listing standards once they are issued.
Revisions to Peer Group for Pay Decisions in 2023
In accordance with our normal practice, the Compensation Committee reviewed a peer group analysis prepared by the Compensation Consultant to support pay decisions in 2023. In response to feedback from our stockholders, the Compensation Committee adjusted the peer group criteria for revenue and market capitalization in order to reflect Quotient's projected revenue and make these criteria more reflective of Quotient's current profile (as set forth below). Consequently, 13 new companies have been added to the 2023 peer group (as compared to the 2022 peer group), while 9 companies in the 2022 peer group were not included in the 2023 peer group.
Revised Peer Group Criteria for Pay Decisions in 2023
ElementDescription2022 Criteria2023 Criteria
RevenueTrailing Twelve Month ("TTM") revenue is within a range comparable to Quotient’s revenue.Generally between 0.5x and 3.7x ($300M to $2B) of Quotient revenue.Generally between 0.5x and 3.25x ($150M to $1B) of Quotient revenue.
Market CapitalizationMarket capitalization is within a range comparable to Quotient’s market capitalization.Generally between 0.5x and 4.0x ($500M to $4.1B) of Quotient market capitalization.Generally between 0.75x and 5.0x ($150M to $1B) of Quotient market capitalization.
Base Salary, Bonus, and LTI Opportunities
Base Salary. In setting base salary for executives in 2023, the Compensation Committee generally set base salary around the 50th percentile to provide competitive compensation, and to realign the cost structure to be more reflective of our goal of managing cash and achieving profitability. Based on this approach, no increase to base salary were made for Messrs. Krepsik and Khan, or for Ms. Chen.The Committee approved an increase to the target incentive opportunity for Khan to 85% in recognition of his appointment as Chief Operating Officer, while remaining as Chief Financial Officer, and the increased scope of his responsibilities.
2023 AIP. The Compensation Committee set the focus for 2023 on revenues and the quality of revenue as assessed by a profitability metric, using Reported Adjusted EBITDA and GAAP revenue goals. Under the terms of the 2023 AIP, Quotient must achieve a minimum threshold Gross Profit in order to qualify for attainment of the GAAP revenue metric.
2023 LTI Program. The Compensation Committee approved the 2023 LTI program grants to certain of its executive officers, which were generally made 50% in the form of RSUs and 50% in the form of PSUs, with PSUs designed to incentivize both profitability and revenue growth over a three year performance period.
2023 Equity Incentive Plan
In June 2023, the Compensation Committee recommended and the Board approved a new equity incentive plan proposal, Proposal No. 2 herein, for stockholder approval, with provisions that are better aligned with stockholder interests and market practices, including:
Prohibiting the repricing of options and stock appreciation rights without stockholder approval;
Eliminating the annual increase in the shares available under the plan (the annual evergreen); and
Preserving, but not increasing, the number of shares currently available under the 2013 Plan.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
57


Under our stock ownership guidelines, policy the CEO and all other NEOs are expected to accumulate and maintain a meaningful level of share ownership. Shares may be owned directly, owned jointly with or separately by the individual’s spouse, or held in trust for the benefit of the individual, the individual’s spouse or children. Under the guidelines, the CEO is expected to own shares of Quotient common stock equal to the lesser of (i) a value equal to five times theirthe CEO's annual base salary orand (ii) 200,000 sharesshares; and all other NEOs are expected to own shares of Quotient common stock equal to the lesser of (i) a value equal to one times theirhis or her annual base salary orand (ii) 30,000 shares. Each NEO, including the CEO, is required to meet these expectations within 5 years of first becoming subject to the stock ownership guidelines.
As of December 31, 2020, Messrs. Boal and2022, of our then-serving NEOs, Mr. Raskin and Mses.Ms. Chen havehad already satisfied the stock ownership guidelines, and we believe Ms. Strayer isMessrs. Krepsik and Khan are on track to meet the objective within the required time frame.


41


The ownership guidelines are shown in the table below.
NameGuideline
Steven BoalLesser of 5 x salary or 200,000 shares
Scott RaskinLesser of 1 x salary or 30,000 shares
Pam StrayerLesser of 1 x salary or 30,000 shares
Connie ChenLesser of 1 x salary or 30,000 shares
Chad Summe(1)
Lesser of 1 x salary or 30,000 shares
(1)Mr. Summe transitioned out of his role as an NEO as of July 31, 2020 and was no longer held to the NEO ownership guidelines.
Consideration of Risk
The Compensation Committee conducted a risk assessment of Quotient’s compensation policies and practices which included a report from Radford.the Compensation Consultant. The Compensation Committee concluded that Quotient’s compensation programs are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse impact on Quotient, its business and its value. Specifically, the Committee noted the following:
Good balance of fixed and variable pay does not encourage excessive risk taking
Good mix of short-term and long-term pay for officers prevents undue focus on short-term results, and overlapping vesting periods for equity awards exposes management to consequences of decision-making during the period in which any risks would materialize
Corporate revenueReported Revenue and Reported Adjusted EBITDA metrics fund the Annual Incentive Plan, and payouts are subject to a maximum cap and require a threshold level of achievement
Executive compensation is reviewed annually, including updates to the peer group
Compensation Committee retains an independent compensation consultant
Robust share ownership guidelines for Officersexecutive officers
Existence of a company-wide Code of Conduct Policy
Robust prohibition against short sales, hedging and pledging prohibitionactivity
Executive Offer Letters
The Company generally executes an offer of employment before an executive joins the Company. In 2022, each of the NEOs (other than Mr. Boal) were employed pursuant to an offer letter agreement that set forth the terms and conditions of the NEO’s employment with us. This offer letter has no specific term, and provides for at-will employment.
In connection with Mr. Khan’s hiring as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, Mr. Khan entered into an offer letter agreement with us outlining the basic terms of his employment. In addition to setting forth Mr. Khan’s start date, starting base salary, 2022 AIP target payout opportunity, 2022 LTI Program awards, additional sign-on RSU award, and eligibility for the Company’s standard benefits programs, the offer letter agreement also provided for (i) a one-time, $75,000 lump sum payment to offset relocation costs associated with Mr. Khan’s move to Salt Lake City, subject to full or partial clawback in the event of certain qualifying terminations of employment prior to the first anniversary of his commencement of employment with the Company, (ii) a housing allowance of up to $10,000 per month for the first 12 months following Mr. Khan’s commencement of employment, subject to his continuous employment with the Company, (iii) reimbursement of expenses for tax preparation assistance not to exceed $5,000 per year for 2022 and 2023; and (iv) immigration support through the Company’s immigration counsel to apply for an initial visa for Mr. Khan’s household partner. As a condition of Mr. Khan’s employment under the offer letter agreement, he, like all other employees, was also required to execute an At-Will Employment, Confidential Information, Invention Assignment and Arbitration Agreement with the Company.
Severance and Change of Control Agreements
We believe that severance and change of control protections play valuable roles in attracting and retaining executive officers. The companyIn 2022, the Company was party to a Change of Control Severance Agreement with each of the NEOs, including Messrs. Khan and Kellerman, who each entered into severancethese agreements in 2022 in connection with their appointments to the position of Chief Financial Officer and changeinterim Chief Financial Officer, respectively. In May of control agreements (each a “Change2022, amendments were made to the Change of Control Agreement”Severance Agreements for Messrs. Krepsik and collectivelyRaskin, and for Ms. Chen. In June of 2022, additional amendments were
58


made to the “ChangeChange of Control Agreements”) with Messrs. Boal,Severance Agreements for Mr. Raskin and Summe and Mses. Strayer andMs. Chen.Details of the severance payments that apply in the event of terminations inside and outside a change of control period are detailed under "Potential Please see “Potential Payments upon Termination, Change of Control or Certain Other Events".Events” for additional information regarding these amendments.
Tax and Accounting Implications
Under Financial Accounting Standard Board ASC Topic 718 we are required to estimate and record an expense for each award of equity compensation over the vesting period of the award. We record share-based compensation expense on an ongoing basis according to ASC 718.
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code places a limit of $1 million on the amount of compensation deductible by a company in any one year with respect to compensation paid to certain of its officers, called covered employees, subject to certain exemptions. In connection with the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted in December 2017, the exemption from the deduction limit for “performance-based compensation” has been repealed, such that compensation paid to our covered employees in excess of $1 million will not be deductible unless it qualifies for transition relief applicable to certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017. The Company will continue to review related guidance from the Internal Revenue Service as it becomes available, including recently-issued proposed regulations under Section 162(m).employees. To maintain flexibility in compensating our executive officers in a manner that promotes varying corporate goals, the Compensation Committee has not adopted a policy that all compensation must be deductible, particularly given that the Company currently carries net operating losses.


401(k) Plan
42
We maintain a tax-qualified retirement plan that provides eligible employees with an opportunity to save for retirement on a tax advantaged basis. Eligible employees are able to participate in the 401(k) plan following the date they meet the plan’s eligibility requirements, and participants are able to defer a percentage of their eligible compensation subject to applicable annual Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and plan limits. Participants are 100% vested in their deferrals. The 401(k) plan permits us to make matching contributions and profit sharing contributions to eligible participants. We currently make a discretionary matching contribution equal to 50% of salary deferrals, not to exceed the lesser of 3% of compensation or $6,000. Participants are vested 100% after one year of service in matching and profit sharing contributions allocated to their account. Both employee contributions and Company contributions are allocated to individual participant accounts, and then are invested in investment alternatives selected by each participant. The 401(k) plan is intended to qualify under Sections 401(a) and 501(a) of the Code.


Other Benefits
Our NEOs are eligible to participate in the same broad-based retirement, health and welfare, and business expense reimbursement policies as other full-time salaried employees.
Except for the relocation expenses provided to Mr. Raskin and Ms. Strayer described above, we offer no perquisites or other personal benefits to our executive officers. In certain circumstances, when necessary for business purposes, we may provide financialadditional assistance for relocation.executive relocation circumstances.
4359



REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis provided above. Based on its review and discussions, our Compensation Committee has recommended to our Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference into the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.2022.
Submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Board:


Joseph Reece (Chairperson)
Andrew Gessow (Chairperson)
David Oppenheimer
Christy WyattEric D. Higgs



4460



2022 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table provides information regarding all plan and non-plan compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to, each of our NEOs during the year ended December 31, 2020,2022 and, to the extent required by SEC disclosure rules, December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018.2020. Except as specified, the footnote disclosures below generally relate only to compensation for 2022. We included footnotes to compensation for prior years in the proxy statements relating to those years.
Name and
Principal
Position
YearSalary
($)
Stock
Awards
($)(1)(2)
Option
Awards
($)(1)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(3)
All Other
Compensation
($)
Total ($)
Steven Boal(8)
2020500,000
2,499,986(9)
1,999,575
7,032(4)
5,006,593
CEO and2019441,2181,797,9001,500,401
6,552(4)
3,746,071
Chairman of the Board2018400,0002,615,7041,719,59989,760
6,552(4)
4,831,615
Scott Raskin(10)
2020450,0001,849,9921,624,655
57,032(5)
3,981,679
President2019
224,567(11)
4,267,493(12)
4,016,21740,018
5,874(4)
8,554,169
Pamela Strayer(13)
2020450,000168,743
100,552(6)
719,295
CFO & Treasurer201975,0001,499,9991,499,613
92(4)
3,074,704
Connie Chen(14)
2020368,804712,492599,871
6,552(4)
1,687,719
GC, Compliance Officer and Secretary
Chad Summe(15)
2020363,750
565,622(16)
424,908
26,214(7)
1,380,494
CSO2019330,0001,022,882900,23849,500
6,216(4)
2,308,836
2018270,0001,113,500240,063
6,189(4)
1,629,752
Name and
Principal
Position
YearSalary
($)
Bonus
($)
Stock
Awards
($)(1)
Option
Awards
($)(2)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(3)
All Other
Compensation
($)
Total ($)
Matthew Krepsik(11)
2022450,5212,901,8011,227,480
6,000(4)
4,585,802
CEO and Member of the Board2021254,5451,388,900138,1986,0001,787,643
Yuneeb Khan(12)
2022226,515
150,000(5)
3,249,824
125,000(6)
3,751,339
CFO, PAO and Treasurer
Connie Chen2022380,0001,445,696243,210
6,000(4)
2,074,906
GC, Compliance Officer and Secretary2021378,750749,989170,4466,0001,305,185
2020368,804712,492599,8716,5521,687,719
Steven Boal(13)
2022250,000
6,823,034(7)
7,328,996(7)
2,130,769(8)
16,532,799
Former CEO2021500,0002,499,995375,0006,0003,380,995
2020500,0002,499,9861,999,5757,0325,006,593
Scott Raskin(14)
2022465,0002,821,836608,025
6,000(4)
3,900,861
Former President2021461,2501,399,996345,9776,0002,213,223
2020450,0001,849,9921,624,65557,0323,981,679
Pamela Strayer(15)
2022117,614
2,170,258(9)
2,287,872
Former CFO & Treasurer2021450,0001,399,996253,1252,103,121
2020450,000168,743100,552719,295
John Kellerman(16)
2022287,739
163,790(10)
6,000(4)
457,529
Former Interim CFO
(1)The amounts reported in this column for 2022 reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of option awards, RSUs and PRSUsPSUs granted during the year as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used to calculate these amounts are discussed in Note 10 to our notes to consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as of December 31, 2020,2022, as filed with the SEC on February 23, 2021. As required byMarch 16, 2023. In accordance with SEC rules, the amounts shown excludeincluded in this column for the impactRSU awards granted during 2022 are calculated by multiplying the numbers of RSUs granted by the closing stock price of a share of Company common stock on the date of grant. The amounts included in this column for the PSU awards granted during 2022 are estimated forfeituresbased on a Monte Carlo simulation model as outlined in Note 10 of our financial statements included in our 2022 Annual Report. Under FASB ASC Topic 718, the vesting condition related to service-based vesting conditions.the PSU awards is considered a market condition and not a performance condition. Accordingly, there is no grant date fair value below or in excess of the amount reflected in the table above for the NEOs that could be calculated and disclosed based on achievement of the underlying market condition. Note that the amounts reported in these columnsthis column reflect the accounting cost for these stock awards, and stock options, and do not correspond to the actual economic value that may be received by the NEOs from them.
(2)The value of the PRSUs granted under Equity Bonus Awardsamounts reported in this column for 2019, assuming that2022 reflect the highest level of performance conditions will be achieved, is as follows: $92,496, for Mr. Raskin, and $122,886 for Mr. Summe. The value of PRSUs granted under Mr. Boal’s Equity Bonus Award reported in this column for 2019, assuming achievement of 100% of performance goals, for Mr. Boal is $297,904. Theaggregate grant date fair value of the PRSUsoptions granted under Equity Bonus Awards reportedduring the year, as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used to calculate these amounts are discussed in Note 10 to our notes to consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as of December 31, 2022, as filed with the SEC on March 16, 2023.
(3)The amounts reflected in this column for 2020, assuming that the highest level of performance conditions will be achieved, is as follows: $224,994 for Mr. Raskin, $168,743 for Ms. Strayer, $112,493 for Ms. Chen, and $140,622 for Mr. Summe. The value of PRSUs granted under Mr. Boal's Equity Bonus Award reported in this column for 2020, assuming achievement of 100% of performance goals, for Mr. Boal is $499,992.
(2)This includes Equity Bonus Awards issued under the Company’s Annual Incentive Plan described above in “Compensation Disclosure & Analysis – Annual Incentive Plan.”
(3)The amounts represent cash payments earned under our Annual Incentive Plan. For more information please see Executive Compensation Discussion & Analysis - Compensation Elements – Annual Incentive Plan.” For 2020,2022, NEOs did not receive cash payments under our Annual Incentive Plan.the AIP.
(4)The amount reported represents 401(k) matching contributions.
(5)The amount reported represents a sign-on bonus per Mr. Khan's offer letter dated March 1, 2022.
(6)The amount reported represents a relocation stipend, and housing allowance per Mr. Khan's offer letter dated March 1, 2022.
(7)This amount includes the incremental fair value associated with the modification of Mr. Boal's outstanding equity awards in connection with his termination of employment to provide variously for repricing, accelerated vesting, or extension of the term of such awards, the total value of which was $10,133,028. This amount is required to be included per SEC disclosure rules and does not reflect a new grant. For more information, please see "Potential Payments upon Termination, Change of Control or Certain Other Events."
(8)The amount reported represents 401(k) matching contributions, and Group Term Life (GTL).a cash severance payment of $2,000,000 and subsidized COBRA coverage having a value of $124,769 per Mr. Boal's Separation Agreement dated May 16, 2022.
(5)The amount reported represents 401(k) matching contributions, Group Term Life (GTL), and a relocation stipend to move from California to Utah to establish the Company's new headquarters in Salt Lake City.
(6)The amount reported represents Group Term Life (GTL), a relocation stipend to move from California to Utah to establish the Company's new headquarters in Salt Lake City, and a sign-on bonus as per (9)Ms. Strayer's offer letter dated October 31, 2019.
(7)The amount reported represents 401(k) matching contributions, Group Term Life (GTL) and cash for COBRA coverage in connection with his departureLTI grant of $2,170,258 was cancelled upon her resignation from the Company.
(8)(10)Includes 39,438 RSUs that were cancelled upon Mr. Kellerman's resignation from the Company.
(11)Mr. Krepsik was appointed CEO effective May 24, 2022.
(12)Mr. Khan was appointed CFO, PAO & Treasurer effective July 5, 2022, and was appointed COO effective February 22,2023.
(13)Mr. Boal was appointed the Company’s Chairmanretired as CEO effective May 20, 2022 and Chief Executive Officer in August 2019, previously Mr. Boal was the Company’s Executive Chairman.
(9)The Compensation Committee determined that based on Company Achievement Mr. Boal did not receive a payout for his Equity Bonus Award. If the Company had performed above 100% of performance goals, Mr. Boal would have been entitled to an additional grant of PRSUs of up to 33,519 shares, valued at $299,995, which would have been granted in 2021. For more information please see Executive Compensation - Compensation Elements – Annual Incentive Plan.”    
(10)Mr. Raskin was appointed the Company’s President in August 2019, previously Mr. Raskin was a Non-Employee Director serving on the Company’s Board.
(11)This includes $40,240 in fees Mr. Raskin received as a Non-Employee Director prior to his appointment as President and resignation from our Board.
(12)Includes, Mr. Raskin’s Non-Employee Director Equity Award of $174,998, which was cancelled upon his appointment as President and resignation from our Board.   
(13)Ms. Strayer was appointed the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer in November 2019.
(14)Ms. Chen became an executive officer as of January 1, 2016. Ms. Chen is only an NEO for Fiscal 2020.
(15)Mr. Summe became an executive officer as of November 19, 2018 when he was promoted to Chief Operating Officer. He ceased being an executive officer as of July 31, 2020 when he transitioned out of his role as Chief Operating Officer to become Chief Strategy Officer. Mr. Summe left the Company on DecemberJune 29, 2022.
(14)Mr. Raskin stepped down as President effective March 31, 2020.
(16)Includes Mr. Summe's Equity Bonus Award of $140,622, which was cancelled upon his resignation as our Chief Strategy Officer.

2023.
4561


(15)Ms. Strayer resigned as CFO and Treasurer effective April 5, 2022.
(16)Mr. Kellerman served as Interim CFO from April 5, 2022 through July 5, 2022, and left the Company November 11, 2022.

62



GRANT OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS
The following table provides information regarding grants of plan-based awards to our NEOs during the Fiscal 2020:2022:
Estimated Possible
Payouts Under Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards(1)
Estimated Future
Payouts Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards(1)
Estimated Future
Payouts Under Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards(2)
NameNameGrant
Date
Threshold
($)(2)
Target
($)(3)
Maximum
($)(5)
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
And Option
Awards ($)
NameGrant
Date
Threshold ($)Target
($)
Maximum ($)Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)(3)
All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options
(#)
Exercise or base price of option awards
($/Sh)
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
And Option
Awards ($)(5)
Matthew KrepsikMatthew Krepsik— 250,000 500,000 750,000 — — — — — — — 
3/1/2022— — — 54,083 162,250 162,250 — — — 639,805 
3/1/2022— — — — — — 162,249 — — 1,052,996 
6/1/2022— — — — — — 300,000 — — 1,209,000 
6/1/2022— — — — — — — 
600,000(4)
4.03 1,227,480 
Yuneeb KhanYuneeb Khan— 172,500 345,000 517,500 — — — — — — — 
8/1/2022— — — 156,794 470,383 470,383 — — — 399,825 
8/1/2022— — — — — — 470,383 — — 1,349,999 
8/1/2022— — — — — — 522,648 — — 1,500,000 
Connie ChenConnie Chen— 114,000 228,000 342,000 — — — — — — — 
3/1/2022— — — 38,520 115,562 115,562 — — — 455,699 
3/1/2022— — — — — — 115,562 — — 749,997 
7/1/2022— — — — — — 75,000 — — 240,000 
7/1/2022— — — — — — — 
150,000(4)
3.20 243,210 
Steven BoalSteven Boal3/1/2020400,000 500,000 650,000 — — — 
499,992(4)
Steven Boal— 250,000 500,000 750,000 — — — — — — — 
3/1/2020— — — 223,463 — — 1,999,994 3/1/2022— — — 128,402 385,208 385,208 — — — 1,519,003 
3/1/2020— — — — 469,461 8.95 1,999,575 3/1/2022— — — — — — 385,208 — — 2,500,000 
Scott Raskin3/1/2020225,000 450,000 675,000 — — — 
224,994(4)
3/1/2020— — — 181,564 — — 1,624,998 5/20/2022— — — — — — — 47,000 4.19 
98,329(6)
3/1/2020— — — — 381,437 8.95 1,624,655 5/20/2022— — — — — — — 600,000 4.19 
1,265,294(6)
Pamela Strayer3/1/2020168,750 337,500 506,250 — — — 
168,743(4)
Connie Chen3/1/2020112,500 225,000 337,500 — — — 
112,493(4)
3/1/2020— — — 67,039 — — 599,999 5/20/2022— — — — — — — 469,461 4.19 
978,160(6)
3/1/2020— — — — 140,838 8.95 599,871 5/20/2022— — — — — — — 299,529 4.19 
679,478(6)
Chad Summe3/1/2020140,625 281,250 421,875 — — — 
140,622(4)(6)
3/1/2020— — — 47,486 — — 425,000 5/20/2022— — — — — — — 300,000 4.19 
742,931(6)
3/1/2020— — — — 99,760 8.95 424,908 5/20/2022— — — — — — — 261,000 4.19 
647,899(6)
5/20/2022— — — — — — — 800,000 4.19 
2,282,211(6)
5/20/2022— — — — — — — 240,000 3.70 
69,496(6)
5/20/2022— — — — — — — 600,000 16.25 
58,075(6)
5/20/2022— — — — — — — 503,000 8.51 
507,124(6)
63


6/29/2022— — — — — — 385,208 — — 
41,090(6)
6/29/2022— — — — — — 385,208 — — 
1,037,411(6)
6/29/2022— — — — — — 177,809 — — 
720,126(6)
6/29/2022— — — — — — 177,809 — — 
495,088(6)
6/29/2022— — — — — — 223,463 — — 
395,952(6)
6/29/2022— — — — — — 150,602 — — 
114,364(6)
Scott Raskin— 232,500 465,000 697,500 — — — — — — — 
3/1/2022— — — 71,905 215,716 215,716 — — — 850,639 
3/1/2022— — — — — — 215,716 — — 1,399,997 
7/1/2022— — — — — — 178,500 — — 571,200 
7/1/2022— — — — — — — 
375,000(4)
3.20 608,025 
Pamela Strayer— 168,750 337,500 506,250 — — — — — — — 
3/1/2022— — — 69,337 208,012 208,012 — — — 820,260 
3/1/2022— — — — — — 208,012 — — 1,349,998 
John Kellerman3/1/2022— — — — — — 
6,000(7)
— — 38,940 
5/1/2022— — — — — — 
10,000(7)
— — 53,100 
8/1/2022— — — — — — 
25,000(7)
— — 71,750 
(1)AllThe Company's AIP is denominated in 100% cash payout to all NEOs; therefore, all amounts reflect total annual incentive awards including the value of the cash, component, if any, issued under the Company’s Annual Incentive Plan. For Mr. Boal, 100%Company's AIP. These amounts represent the threshold, target and maximum cash award levels set in 2022 under the AIP.
(2)The PSU awards, which were issued under the 2013 Plan, are subject to vesting based upon the Company's achievement of his annual incentive award would be paid as an Equity Bonus Award in PRSUs. For all other NEOs,stock price goals during the period beginning on March 1, 2022 and ending on March 1, 2025. The PSU awards vest with respect to one-third installments if the Company's stock price achieves, for twenty consecutive trading days, a price per share that equals or exceeds the following thresholds: $9.735, $12.98, and $16.225; provided that if any threshold is met before February 28, 2023, 50% of their target annual incentive award would be paid as an Equity Bonus Award in PRSUsthe tranche will vest on that date and the remainder, if any, would be paid in cash. For more information please see Executive Compensation - Compensation Elements – Annual Incentive Plan.” Note, NEOs did not receive cash compensation from our Annual Incentive Plan, as reflected inremaining 50% will vest one year later. With the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation columnexception of the “Summary Compensation Table” above.
(2)The threshold amount reflects the minimum value NEOs would receive if company performance achievement is made at threshold. At this level, all NEOs would be paid in PRSUs.
(3)The target amount reflects the target value NEOs would receive if company performance achievement is made at target. The valuecertain qualifying terminations of the PRSUs grantedemployment (as described under the Equity Bonus Awards is as follows: $224,994 for Mr. Raskin, $168,743 for Ms. Strayer, $112,493 for Ms. Chen, and $140,622 for Mr. Summe. The remainder of their annual incentive award would be paid in cash. The value of PRSUs granted under Mr. Boal’s Equity Bonus Award is $499,992.
(4)Reflects the value of the PRSUs under the Equity Bonus Award.
(5)The maximum amount reflects the maximum value NEOs would receive if company performance achievement is made above target. Any amount earned would be effectuated with an additional grant in 2021 for Mr. Boal. For all other NEOs, any amount earned would be paid in cash.
(6)The Equity Bonus Award for Mr. Summe was cancelled when he departed from the Company.


















46


Executive Employment Arrangements
Steven Boal
We have not entered into an employment agreement with Steven Boal, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and his employment is at-will. We may enter into such an agreement with him in the future. Mr. Boal’s base salary as of December 31, 2020 was $500,000 and his annual target bonus was 100% of his base salary. Mr. Boal is also eligible to participate in the employee benefit plans made available to most of our other employees.
Please see “Potential Payments upon Termination, Change of Control or Certain Other Events”), the executive generally must provide service through the vesting date in order to vest in his or her PSUs.
(3)The RSUs granted under the 2013 Plan to each of the NEOs (other than Mr. Krepsik) in 2021 were granted subject to time-based vesting in quarterly installments over the four year period beginning on March 1, 2021, provided that the executive remains continually employed through each applicable vesting date. Mr. Krepsik’s May 1, 2021 award of 75,000 RSUs shall vest with respect to 25% of the award on May 1, 2022, and in equal quarterly installments thereafter until the May 1, 2025, and his May 1, 2021 award of 10,000 RSUs shall vest in full on May 1, 2022, in each case, subject to his continuous employment through each applicable vesting date. The RSUs granted on March 1, 2022 to Messrs. Krepsik, Raskin, and Boal, and Mses. Chen and Strayer, and the RSU granted on August 1, 2022 to Mr. Khan of 470,383 RSUs were granted subject to time-based vesting in quarterly installments over the four year period beginning on March 1, 2022 for additional information.NEOs (other than Mr. Khan whose begins on August 1, 2022). Mr. Khan's August 1, 2022 award of 522,648 RSUs will vest with respect to 25% of the award on August 1, 2023, and in equal quarterly installments thereafter until August 1, 2026. Mr. Krepsik's RSUs granted on June 1, 2022, and Mr. Raskin and Ms. Chen's RSUs granted on July 1, 2022 vest in quarterly installments over a four-year period beginning on June 1, 2022 for Mr. Krepsik and July 1, 2022 for Mr. Raskin and Ms. Chen. All RSUs granted are subject to the NEOs continuous employment through each applicable vesting date.
Scott(4)Messrs. Krepsik and Raskin
Scott Raskin, our President since August 5, 2019, is employed with us and Ms Chen's options vest pursuant to an offer letter dated August 5, 2019, which sets forth1/48 of the termsshares vest on the first day of each month after the grant date, subject to the NEOs continuous employment through each applicable vesting date.
(5)The amounts reported in this column reflect the grant date values of stock awards made to our NEOs computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The amounts included in this column for the PSU awards granted during 2022 are estimated based on a Monte Carlo simulation model as outlined in Note 10 of our financial statements included in our 2022 Annual Report. Under FASB ASC Topic 718, the vesting condition related to the PSU awards is considered a market condition and conditionsnot a performance condition. Accordingly, there is no grant date fair value below or in excess of his employment with us.the amount reflected in the table above for the NEOs that could be calculated and disclosed based on achievement of the underlying market condition. The offer letter has no specific term and constitutes at-will employment. Mr. Raskin’s base salaryassumptions used to calculate these amounts are discussed in Note 10 to our notes to consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as of December 31, 2020 was $450,0002022, as filed with the SEC on March 16, 2023.
(6)Awards reflected in these rows for Mr. Boal reflect the incremental fair value associated with modifications to his outstanding equity awards in connection with his termination of employment.
(7)Mr. Kellerman's RSUs granted on March 1, 2022 and his annual target bonus was 100% of his base salary. Mr. Raskin is also eligibleMay 1, 2022 were granted subject to participatevesting in employee benefit plans that are generally available to most of our employees.
Please see “Potential Payments upon Termination, Change of Control or Certain Other Events” for additional information.
Pamela Strayer
Pamela Strayer, our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since November 11, 2019, is employed pursuant to an offer letter dated October 31, 2019, which sets forth the terms and conditions of her employment with us. This offer letter has no specific term and constitutes at-will employment. Ms. Strayer’s base salary as of December 31, 2020 was $450,000 and her annual target bonus was 75% of her base salary. Ms. Strayer is also eligible to participate in employee benefit plans that are generally available to most of our other employees.
Please see “Potential Payments upon Termination, Change of Control or Certain Other Events” for additional information.
Connie Chen
Connie Chen, our General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary since January 1, 2016, is employed pursuant to an offer letter dated August 19, 2013, which sets forth the terms and conditions of her employment with us. This offer letter has no specific term and constitutes at-will employment. Ms. Chen's base salary as of December 31, 2020 was $375,000 and her annual target bonus was 60% of her base salary. Ms. Chen is also eligible to participate in employee benefit plans that are generally available to most of our other employees.
Please see “Potential Payments upon Termination, Change of Control or Certain Other Events” for additional information.
Chad Summe
Chad Summe, our former Chief Strategy Officer, was employed with us pursuant to an offer letter dated August 23, 2012, which sets forth the terms and conditions of his employment with us. The offer letter has no specific term and constitutes at-will employment. Mr. Summe’s base salary as of December 31, 2020 was $375,000 and his annual target bonus was 75% of his base salary. Mr. Summe was also eligible to participate in employee benefit plans that are generally available to most of our employees. Mr. Summe left the Companyfull on December 31, 2020.2022, and his RSUs granted on August 1, 2022 vest in quarterly installments over a four-year period beginning on August 1, 2022, in each case, subject to continuous employment through each applicable vesting date.
Please see “Potential Payments upon Termination, Change of Control or Certain Other Events” for additional information.


4764



Potential Payments upon Termination, Change of Control or Certain Other Events
We believe that severance and change of control protections play valuable roles in attracting and retaining executive officers.
Change of Control Severance Agreements
The following is a summary of the terms of the Change of Control Severance Arrangements for each of the NEOs, other than Messrs. Boal and Kellerman and Ms. Strayer, each of whom experienced a termination of employment during 2022.
During 2022, the Company was party to a Change of Control Severance Agreement with each of the NEOs which were in place prior to 2022. In 2022, with the commencement of Mr. Khan's employment as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, the Company entered into a Change of Control Severance Agreement (each, a “Changeeffective July 5 2022, on the same general terms as other NEOs, with respect to his role.
During 2022, the Compensation Committee approved certain amendments to individual Change of Control Agreement,”Severance Agreements. On April 25, 2022, the Compensation Committee approved changes, effective May 1, 2022, to each of the Change of Control Severance Agreements for Messrs. Krepsik and collectively,Raskin and Ms. Chen. The changes to each Change of Control Agreement were approved by the Compensation Committee for the purpose of retaining our key employees, and minimizing the risk of their departure. These changes included: (i) modifying the “Change of Control Agreements”)Period” (as defined below) to commence six months, rather than three months, prior to a Change of Control, and (ii) modifying the definition of “Good Reason” (as defined below) to provide clarification regarding when a material reduction of the NEO’s duties, authorities, or responsibilities will constitute Good Reason. For Mr. Krepsik, in connection with Steven Boal, the Company's Chairman andhis appointment as Chief Executive Officer, on August 2, 2016, as amended onthe material changes also included (i) extending the term of the agreement to May 1, 2019; with Chad Summe,2025, (ii) providing for payment of severance benefits in the event of Mr. Krepsik's resignation of employment for "Good Reason" outside of the Change of Control Period, and (iii) increasing the severance benefits to which Mr. Krepsik is entitled in the event of a qualifying termination (both during and outside of the Change of Control Period). Additionally, the Compensation Committee approved further amendments to the Change of Control Severance Agreements for Mr. Raskin and Ms. Chen in June of 2022. The purpose of the June 2022 amendments, as explained further below, was to retain Mr. Raskin and Ms. Chen in order to prevent additional disruption which would be detrimental to the Company’s former Chief Strategy Officer, on January 1, 2018, as amended on May 1, 2019; with Scott Raskin,business following Mr. Boal’s departure from the Company’s President, on August 5, 2019; with Pamela Strayer, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, on November 11, 2019; and with Connie Chen, the Company's General Counsel, Compliance Officer and Secretary on July 26, 2016, as amended on May 1, 2019.Company.
Each Change of Control Severance Agreement has a three-year term, which automatically renews for successive three-year periods thereafter, and any obligations of the Company will lapse upon the end of the term. Pursuant to the Change of Control Severance Agreements, if the NEO’s employment with the Company is terminated without Cause"Cause" (as such term is defined in the Change of Control AgreementSeverance Agreements and summarized below) and not by reason of death or Disability"Disability" (as such term is defined in the Change of Control Severance Agreement), or forin case of Messrs. Boal andKrepsik, Raskin and Ms. Strayer,or Khan, if the NEO terminates their employment with the Company for Good Reason"Good Reason" (as such term is defined in the Change of Control Severance Agreement and summarized below), and, in any event, such termination does not occur within threesix months before or twelve months after a Change"Change of ControlControl" (as such term is defined in the Change of Control Severance Agreement) of the Company (the “Change of Control Period”), then, provided the NEO signs and does not revoke a separation agreement and release of claims in favor of the Company and subject to the terms of the Change of Control Severance Agreement, the NEO will receive benefits as summarized in the table below and described more fully in the text following the table.
65


NameTermination EventLump Sum (% of annual base salary)Health Coverage Lump Sum (monthly COBRA premium factor)Outstanding and unvested equity at termination
Steven Boal
Matthew Krepsik(1)
Termination Without Cause/Resign for Good Reason100%x 12Forfeit
Scott Raskin(1)
Yuneeb Khan
Termination Without Cause/Resign for Good Reason100%x 12Forfeit unless termination occurs before first anniversary of employment start date
Pam StrayerScott RaskinTermination Without Cause/Resign for Good Reason100%x 12Forfeit
Connie ChenTermination Without Cause75%x 9Forfeit
Chad SummeTermination Without Cause75%x 9Forfeit
(1)25%Increased from 75% of annual base salary and a monthly COBRA premium factor of x9 as part of the May 1, 2022 amendments and restatement of Mr. Raskin's then outstanding and unvested Equity Awards would have vested if the termination event occurred before the first anniversaryKrepsik's Change of Control Severance Agreement as part of his employment start date.promotion to CEO.
As indicated in the table above, if the termination event occurs outside of the Change of Control Period, the NEO will receive the following benefits: (i) a lump-sum payment (less applicable withholding taxes) equal to 100% for Messrs. Boal andKrepsik, Raskin and Ms. StrayerKhan and 75% for Mr. Summe and Ms. Chen, of the NEO’s annual base salary as in effect immediately prior to the NEO’s termination date, and (ii) a taxable lump-sum payment (less applicable withholding taxes) in an amount equal to the monthly COBRA premium that the NEO would be required to pay to continue the NEO’s group health coverage in effect on the date of NEO’s termination of employment, multiplied by twelve for Messrs. Boal andKrepsik, Raskin and Ms. StrayerKhan and nine for Mr. Summe and Ms. Chen. Under Mr. Raskin’s Change of Control Agreement, 25% of Mr. Raskin’s then outstanding and unvested Equity Awards (as such term is defined inNotwithstanding the foregoing, pursuant to the June 2022 amendments to the Change of Control Agreement)Severance Agreements for each of Mr. Raskin and Ms. Chen, in the event a qualifying termination outside of a Change of Control Period occurs between June 10, 2022 and June 10, 2025 (the "Retention Period"), these executives will become vestedinstead be entitled to receive the following: (i) a lump-sum payment (less applicable withholding taxes) equal to 150% or 200% (in the case of Ms. Chen and Mr. Raskin, respectively) of the NEO's annual base salary as in fulleffect immediately prior to the NEO's termination date, (ii) a taxable lump-sum payment (less applicable withholding taxes) in an amount equal to the monthly COBRA premium that the NEO would be required to pay to continue the NEO's group health coverage in effect on the date of the NEO's termination of employment, multiplied by 18 or 24 (in the case of Ms. Chen and Mr. Raskin, respectively), and (iii) the NEO will receive a lump-sum payment (less applicable withholding taxes) equal to 150% or 200% (in the case of Ms. Chen and Mr. Raskin, respectively) of the NEO's annual bonus for the year of termination at target level as in effect immediately prior to the NEO's termination date.
Additionally, Ms. Chen’s amended Change of Control Severance Agreement provides that if a qualifying termination occurs outside of the Change of Control Period but within the Retention Period, then 50% of the total number of shares subject to her then-outstanding and unvested equity awards subject solely to time-based vesting conditions will vest and, in the case of stock options, become exercisable. Mr. Raskin’s amended Change of Control Severance Agreement provides that in the event of such a termination, 100% of the total number of shares subject to his then-outstanding and unvested equity awards subject solely to time-based vesting conditions will vest and, in the case of stock options, become exercisable, and PSU awards granted to him on March 1, 2021 and March 1, 2022 will vest at target level. Furthermore, each outstanding stock option award held by Mr. Raskin as of the termination date will be amended to extend the post-termination exercise period of the option as follows: (A) if the option has an exercise price that equals or exceeds the closing price of a share of the Company’s common stock as of his termination date, then the stock option will remain exercisable through the third anniversary of the termination date, and (B) if the option does not have an exercise price that equals or exceeds the closing price of a share of the Company’s common stock as of the termination date, then the stock option will remain exercisable through the earlier to occur of the third anniversary of the termination date and the date on which the option would have expired if Mr. Raskin’s employment withhad continued through the Company is terminated without Cause and not by reasonfull term of death or Disability, or if he terminates his employment with the Company for Good Reason, in each case before the first anniversary of his start date.
48


option.
Pursuant to the terms of the Change of Control Agreement,Severance Agreements, if the NEO’s employment with the Company is terminated by the Company without Cause and not by reason of death or Disability or the NEO terminates his or her employment with the Company for Good Reason, and, in any event, such termination
66


occurs during the Change of Control Period, then, providedif the NEO signs and does not revoke a separation agreement and release of claims in favor of the Company and subject to the terms of the Change of Control Agreement, the NEO will receive benefits as summarized in the table below and described more fully in the text following the table.
NameNameLump sum
% of annual salary
Lump sum % of target annual incentiveHealth coverage monthly COBRA premium factor
Outstanding and unvested equity at termination(1)
NameLump sum
% of annual base salary
Lump sum % of target annual incentiveHealth coverage monthly COBRA premium factor
Outstanding and unvested equity at termination(1)
Steven Boal150%x 18100% vests
Matthew Krepsik(2)
Matthew Krepsik(2)
150%x 18100% vesting of time-vesting Equity Awards
Scott RaskinScott Raskin150%x 18100% vestsScott Raskin150%x 18100% vesting of time-vesting Equity Awards
Pam Strayer150%x 18100% vests
Yuneeb KhanYuneeb Khan150%x 18100% vesting of time-vesting Equity Awards
Connie ChenConnie Chen100%x 12100% vestsConnie Chen100%x 12100% vesting of time-vesting Equity Awards
Chad Summe100%x 12100% vests
(1)RegardlessAs noted below, the Change of employment status,Control Severance Agreements provide that for equity awards granted under the 2013any Equity Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee has the discretionAwards which are subject to approve acceleratedperformance-based vesting, of all then-outstandingsuch performance goals and unvested equity ifother vesting criteria shall be treated as set forth in the underlying equityaward agreement – see “Equity Incentive Awards” below for a description of the terms applicable to the PSU awards are not assumed or substitutedheld by the acquiring company. Outstanding and unvested awards granted under the 2006 Plan that are not assumed or substituted by the acquiring company fully vesteach NEO in the event of a termination in connection with a Change of Control.
(2)Increased from 100% of annual base salary, 100% target annual bonus, and a monthly COBRA premium factor of x12 as part of the May 1, 2022 amendment and restatement of Mr. Krepsik's Change of Control Severance Agreement.

As indicated in the table above, if the termination event occurs during the Change of Control Period, the NEO will receive the following benefits: (i) a lump-sum payment (less applicable withholding taxes) equal to 150% for Messrs. Boal andKrepsik, Raskin and Ms. StrayerKhan and 100% for Mr. Summe and Ms. Chen of the NEO'sNEO’s annual base salary as in effect immediately prior to the NEO’s termination date or, if greater, at the level in effect immediately prior to the Change of Control; (ii) a lump-sum payment (less applicable withholding taxes) equal to 150% for Messrs. Boal andKrepsik, Raskin and Ms. StrayerKhan and 100% of Mr. Summe andfor Ms. Chen of the NEO’s annual bonus for the year of termination at target level, as in effect immediately prior to the NEO’s termination date, or if greater, at the level in effect immediately prior to the Change of Control; (iii) a taxable lump-sum payment (less applicable withholding taxes) in an amount equal to the monthly COBRA premium that the NEO would be required to pay to continue NEO’s group health coverage in effect on the date of the NEO’s termination of employment, multiplied by eighteen for Messrs. Boal andKrepsik, Raskin and Ms. StrayerKhan and twelve for Mr. Summe and Ms. Chen; and (iv) 100% of the NEO’s then-outstanding and unvested Equity Awards (as such term is defined in the Change of Control Severance Agreement) will become vested in full and in the case of stock options and stock appreciateappreciation rights, will become exercisable.exercisable; provided that in the case of any Equity Awards which are subject to performance-based vesting, all such performance goals and other vesting criteria will be treated as set forth in the underlying award agreement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, pursuant to the June 2022 amendments to the Change of Control Severance Agreements for each of Mr. Raskin and Ms. Chen, if a qualifying termination occurs during a Change of Control Period and also during the Retention Period, then Mr. Raskin and Ms. Chen will instead be entitled to receive the following benefits: (i) a lump-sum payment (less applicable withholding taxes) equal to 150% or 200% (in the case of Ms. Chen and Mr. Raskin, respectively) of the NEO's annual base salary as in effect immediately prior to the NEO's termination date; (ii) a lump-sum payment (less applicable withholding taxes) equal to 150% or 200% (in the case of Ms. Chen and Mr. Raskin, respectively) of the NEO's annual bonus for the year of termination at target level effective immediately prior to the NEO's termination date; and (iii) a taxable lump-sum payment (less applicable withholding taxes) in an amount equal to the monthly COBRA premium that the NEO would be required to pay to continue the NEO's group health coverage in effect on the date of the NEO's termination of employment, multiplied by 18 or 24 (in the case of Ms. Chen and Mr. Raskin, respectively). In the event of such a termination, Mr. Raskin and Ms. Chen will each still be entitled to receive the equity acceleration described in the table above, but Mr. Raskin will also be entitled to amendment of each of his outstanding stock option awards to extend the post-termination exercise period of the options as follows: (A) if the option has an exercise price that equals or exceeds the closing price of a share of the Company’s common stock as of such termination date, then the option will remain exercisable through the third anniversary of the termination date, and (B) if the option does not have an exercise price that equals or exceeds the closing price of a share of the Company’s common stock as of the termination date, then the option will remain exercisable through the earlier to occur of the third anniversary of the termination date and
67


the date on which such option would have expired if Mr. Raskin’s employment had continued through the full term of the option.
In the event that the severance and other benefits payable to the NEO constitute “parachute payments” under Section 280G of the U.S. tax codeCode and would be subject to the applicable excise tax, then the NEO’s severance benefits will be either (A) delivered in full or (B) delivered to such lesser extent which would result in no portion of such benefits being subject to the excise tax, whichever results in the receipt by the NEO on an after-tax basis of the greatest amount of benefits.
For purposes of each Change of Control Severance Agreement, “Cause” means the occurrence of any of the following: (i) NEO’s conviction of, or plea of “no contest” to, a felony or any crime involving fraud or embezzlement; (ii) NEO’s intentional misconduct; (iii) NEO’s material failure to perform his or her employment duties; (iv) NEO’s unauthorized use or disclosure of any proprietary information or trade secrets of the Company, or any of its subsidiaries, or any other party to whom NEO owes an obligation of nondisclosure as a result of his or her relationship with the Company or any of its subsidiaries; (v) an act of material fraud or dishonesty against the Company or any of its subsidiaries; (vi) NEO’s material violation of any policy of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or material breach of any written agreement with the Company or any of its subsidiaries; or (vii) NEO’s failure to cooperate with the Company in any investigation or formal proceeding.
For purposes of each Change of Control Severance Agreement, “Good Reason” means the NEO’s termination of his or her employment in accordance with the next sentence after the occurrence of one or more of the following events without the NEO’s express written consent: (i) a material reduction of the NEO’s duties, authorities, or responsibilities relative to NEO’s duties, authorities, or responsibilities in effect immediately prior to such reduction; (ii) a material reduction by the Company in the NEO’s rate of annual base salary; provided, however, that, a reduction of annual base salary that also applies to substantially all other similarly situated
49


employees of the Company will not constitute “Good Reason”; (iii) a material change in the geographic location of the NEO’s primary work facility or location; provided, that a relocation of less than thirty-five miles from the NEO’s then present location will not be considered a material change in geographic location; or (iv) the failure of the Company to obtain from any successor or transferee of the Company an express written and unconditional assumption of the Company’s obligations to the NEO under the Change of Control Severance Agreement. Ms. Strayer’sThe Change of Control Agreement providesSeverance Agreements for each of Messrs. Krepsik, Raskin and Khan and Ms. Chen provide that the first clause above also includes wherecircumstances in which such material reduction results solely by virtue of the Company being acquired or made part of a larger entity (as, for example, when the Chief Financial Officer of the Company remains as such following a Change of Control but is not made the Chief Financial Officer of the acquiring corporation). In order for the NEO’s termination of employment to be for Good Reason, the NEO must not terminate employment with the Company without first providing the Company with written notice of the acts or omissions constituting the grounds for “Good Reason” within ninety days of the initial existence of the grounds for “Good Reason” and a cure period of thirty days following the date of written notice (the “Cure Period”), such grounds must not have been cured during such time, and the NEO must terminate his employment within thirty days following the Cure Period.
Mr. Summe departed fromEquity Incentive Awards
In the Company on December 31, 2020. We paid himevent of a total“Change in Control” as defined in the 2013 Plan, the acquiring or successor entity may assume or continue all or any awards outstanding under the 2013 Plan or substitute substantially equivalent awards. Any awards which are not assumed or continued in connection with a Change in Control or are not exercised or settled prior to the Change in Control will terminate effective as of $19,973the time of the Change in cash severanceControl. The Compensation Committee may provide for the acceleration of vesting of any or all outstanding awards upon such terms and to such extent as it determines, except that the vesting of all awards held by members of the Board who are not employees will automatically be accelerated in full. The 2013 Plan authorizes the Compensation Committee, in its discretion and without the consent of any participant, to cancel each or any outstanding award denominated in shares upon a Change in Control in exchange for a releasepayment to the participant with respect to each share subject to the cancelled award of any potential claims in favor of the Company, which consists of a taxable lump sum payment (less applicable withholding taxes) in an amount equal to the monthly COBRA premium that Mr. Summe wouldexcess of the consideration to be requiredpaid per share of common stock in the Change in Control transaction over the exercise price per share, if any, under the award.
Under each of the Restricted Stock Unit Agreements pursuant to paywhich the NEOs have been granted RSUs under the 2013 Plan, the NEO generally must be in service on the applicable vesting date in order to continue his group health coveragevest in the NEO's RSUs. However, in the case of RSUs granted on or after February 3, 2021, if the NEO’s employment or service with a “Participating Group Company” (as such term is defined in the 2013 Plan) (“Service”) terminates
68


due to death on or after the first anniversary of the date of Mr. Summe'sgrant, then the RSUs held by the NEO will become fully vested. If the NEO has entered into a Change of Control Severance Agreement and the NEO’s Service is terminated by the Participating Company Group other than for “Cause” or by the NEO for “Good Reason” (as such terms are defined in the Change of Control Severance Agreements) during the Change of Control Period, then the RSUs will be treated as described above.
With respect to each of the outstanding PSU awards granted to the NEOs under the 2013 Plan, the applicable grant notices provide that in the event of the NEO’s termination of employment,Service by reason of death occurring on or after the first anniversary of the grant date (but prior to a Change of Control), the number of PSUs associated with a 100% payout percentage (or, in the case of PSUs granted during 2022, the full number of units subject to the award) will become vested and be paid out. In the event of a termination of the NEO’s Service by reason of Disability prior to a Change of Control, a number of PSUs equal to the number of PSUs associated with a 100% payout percentage (or, in the case of the PSUs granted in 2022, the full number of units subject to the award), multiplied by 9.a percentage equal to the number of months in the performance period that the NEO was in service divided by 36 (or, in the case of Mr. Khan, 31) will become vested and be paid out. In the event of a termination of the NEO’s Service by the Company other than for Cause (other than for death or Disability) that occurs on or after the first anniversary of the grant date (but prior to a Change of Control), a number of PSUs equal to the full number of PSUs subject to the award multiplied by a percentage equal to the number of months in the performance period during which the NEO was in service divided by 36 (or, in the case of Mr. Khan, 31) (in the case of the 2022 PSUs, reduced by any PSUs that had previously become vested) will become vested (to the extent, if any, based on actual performance) on the original vesting date that would have applied in the absence of the NEO’s termination. In the event of any other termination of Service prior to a Change of Control, the PSUs will immediately terminate.
With respect to each of the outstanding PSU awards granted to the NEOs under the 2013 Plan prior to 2022, in the event of a Change of Control, if the acquiror assumes, continues or substitutes for the award, a number of PSUs shall be deemed eligible for vesting equal to the greater of (i) actual performance against certain applicable performance metrics under the awards, determined as if the date of the Change of Control was the final day of the performance period, or (ii) a number of PSUs associated with a 100% payout percentage (such higher number of PSUs, the “COC Eligible Units”). The COC Eligible Units will become vested on January 1, 2024, subject to the NEO’s continued Service through such date, except that in the event of the NEO’s termination of Service during the Change of Control Period (as such term is defined in the NEO’s Change of Control Severance Agreement, if applicable) by the Company without Cause or by the NEO for Good Reason (as defined in the applicable Change of Control Severance Agreement) or by reason of the NEO’s death, the COC Eligible Units will immediately become vested upon the date of such termination or, if later, the date of the Change of Control (and in the event of any other termination, will immediately terminate). In the event of a Change of Control in which the acquiror does not assume, continue or substitute for the PSU award, the COC Eligible Units will become vested as of immediately prior to the Change of Control, subject to the NEO’s continued Service through immediately prior to such event.
With respect to each of the outstanding PSU awards granted to the NEOs during 2022, if a Change of Control occurs while any portion of these PSUs are outstanding and unvested, then the PSUs will become vested upon the Change of Control if and to the extent that the applicable stock price hurdles are satisfied, except that the value of a share of common stock used to determine the vesting of such PSUs will be based solely on the amount or value of the per share consideration payable in such Change of Control. To the extent any PSUs do not become vested before or upon a Change of Control, and the acquiror assumes, continues or substitutes for such unvested PSUs, then all such unvested PSUs will become vested on March 1, 2025, subject to the NEO’s continuous service through that date, provided that if the NEO’s service is terminated during the Change of Control Period by Quotient without Cause or by the NEO for Good Reason or by reason of the NEO’s death, then all unvested 2022 PSUs will become vested as of the date of such termination. Upon any other termination of the NEO’s service following a Change of Control, the unvested PSUs will immediately terminate.
Under the Stock Option Agreements pursuant to which each of the NEOs, other than Mr. Krepsik, held unvested stock options as of December 31, 2022, unvested options thereunder will terminate immediately upon the NEO’s termination of Service, except as otherwise set forth in the NEO's Change of Control Severance Agreement, as described above.
Termination Payments for NEOs Separated from Employment During 2022
Boal Separation Agreement and Release
69


On May 16, 2022, the Company entered into a Separation Agreement and Release (the “Separation Agreement”) with Mr. Boal pursuant to which Mr. Boal ceased to serve as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, effective as of May 20, 2022, and separated from his employment with the Company, effective as of June 29, 2022. In consideration for Mr. Boal’s execution of the Separation Agreement and non-revocation of a mutual waiver and release of claims relating thereto, Mr. Boal became entitled to the following benefits under the Separation Agreement in lieu of the benefits payable under the Change of Control Severance Agreement to which he had been a party:
a lump sum cash severance benefit in the amount of $2,000,000, representing two times his annual base salary and target annual bonus;
payment of Mr. Boal’s premiums for continued health benefits provided under COBRA for 36 months after his termination date;
full acceleration of vesting of all outstanding options, restricted stock units and performance stock units held by Mr. Boal, with performance stock units payable at 100% of the target level of performance; and
amendment of outstanding stock options held by Mr. Boal to provide that (i) in the case of certain options relating to an aggregate of 2,776,990 shares of the Company’s common stock, if the exercise price of such options exceeded the closing price of a share of the Company’s common stock as of the day on which Mr. Boal ceased to serve as Chief Executive Officer of the Company (the “CEO End Date”), (A) the exercise price of each such option would be reduced to an amount equal to the closing price of a share of the Company’s common stock as of the CEO End Date and (B) such option would remain exercisable through the third anniversary of Mr. Boal’s termination date and (ii) each outstanding option other than an options described in clause (i) above would remain exercisable through the earlier to occur of the third anniversary of Mr. Boal’s termination date and the date on which such option would have expired if Mr. Boal’s employment had continued through the full term of such option. The CEO End Date occurred on May 20, 2022.
The focus and objective of the Compensation Committee in approving the terms of the Separation Agreement with Mr. Boal described above was to facilitate a smooth and efficient transition of responsibility from Mr. Boal to our new CEO, on an accelerated timeline in response to settlement proposals by the Engaged Group. The Compensation Committee believes that in the context of these unusual and disruptive circumstances and the need to restore stability to the Company, the terms of the Separation Agreement, while atypical, were in the best interests of all of Quotient’s stockholders.
Strayer Consulting Agreement
In connection with Ms. Strayer’s resignation from employment, she entered into a Consulting Agreement with the Company dated as of April 15, 2022, pursuant to which she agreed to provide consulting and transition services as an independent contractor during the period from April 5, 2022 through May 2, 2022. Ms. Strayer was not entitled to any cash compensation for her services during this period; however, Ms. Strayer's Consulting Agreement provided that certain specified equity awards which were granted to Ms. Strayer during her service as an employee would continue to vest during this period as if she remained an employee of the Company. Ms. Strayer's Consulting Agreement included certain confidentiality covenants in favor of the Company. Ms. Strayer’s entry into Ms. Strayer's Consulting Agreement described above was conditioned upon her execution and non-revocation of a Separation Agreement and Release with Quotient. Other than the continued vesting of certain equity awards described above, Ms. Strayer was not entitled to receive any severance payments or benefits in connection with her termination of employment.
Kellerman Severance Benefits
Mr. Kellerman voluntarily resigned his employment with the Company effective as of November 11, 2022. As a consequence, he was not entitled to receive any severance benefits in connection with his resignation.
The following table sets forth the estimated incremental payments and benefits that would behave been payable to our NEOs (excluding any NEO who experienced a termination of employment during 2022) in different termination scenarios under our executive compensation arrangements assuming that the triggering event occurred on December 31, 2020.30, 2022 (the last business day of the fiscal year). Due to the number of factors that affect the nature and amount of any potential payments or benefits, actual payments and benefits may differ from those presented in the table below.
NameTermination Scenario
Cash
Severance ($)(1)
COBRA
Benefits($)
RSU
Awards ($)(1)
Option
Awards ($)(2)
Total
($)
Steven BoalTermination Without Cause/Resignation
for Good Reason
500,000 36,215 — — 536,215 
Termination without Cause or Resignation
for Good Reason within 3 Months Prior or
12 Months Following a Change of Control
1,500,000 54,322 3,188,350 179,276 4,921,948 
Scott RaskinTermination Without Cause/Resignation for Good Reason450,000 25,697 — — 475,697 
Termination without Cause or Resignation
for Good Reason within 3 Months Prior or
12 Months Following a Change of Control
1,350,000 38,546 4,918,945 1,757,557 8,065,048 
Pamela StrayerTermination Without Cause/Resignation for Good Reason450,000 25,697 — — 475,697 
Termination without Cause or Resignation
for Good Reason within 3 Months Prior or
12 Months Following a Change of Control
1,181,250 38,546 1,223,724 196,579 2,640,099 
Connie ChenTermination Without Cause281,250 18,007 — — 299,257 
Termination without Cause or Resignation
for Good Reason within 3 Months Prior or
12 Months Following a Change of Control
600,000 24,009 915,841 53,783 1,593,633 
Chad Summe(3)
Termination Without Cause— — — — — 
Termination without Cause or Resignation
for Good Reason within 3 Months Prior or
12 Months Following a Change of Control
— — — — — 
70


NameScenarioCash
Severance ($)
COBRA
Benefits($)
RSU & PSU
Awards ($)(1)
Option
Awards ($)(2)
Total
($)
Matthew KrepsikTermination Without Cause/Resignation
for Good Reason
500,000 39,680 — — 539,680 
Termination for Death— — 452,331 — 452,331 
Termination for Disability— — 292,263 — 292,263 
Termination without Cause or Resignation
for Good Reason during the Change of Control Period
1,500,000 59,520 2,361,394 — 3,920,914 
Termination for Death During the Change of Control Period— — 848,068 — 848,068 
Change of Control— — 848,068 — 848,068 
Scott RaskinTermination Without Cause/Resignation for Good Reason During the Retention Period1,860,000 56,087 2,993,814 77,266 4,987,167 
Termination for Death— — 533,650 — 533,650 
Termination for Disability— — 433,219 — 433,219 
Termination without Cause or Resignation
for Good Reason during the Change of Control Period and Retention Period
1,860,000 56,087 2,993,814 77,266 4,987,167 
Termination for Death During the Change of Control Period— — 1,081,441 — 1,081,441 
Change of Control— — 1,081,441 — 1,081,441 
Yuneeb KhanTermination Without Cause/Resignation for Good Reason460,000 9,362 — — 469,362 
Termination for Death— — — — — 
Termination for Disability— — 260,227 — 260,227 
Termination without Cause or Resignation
for Good Reason during the Change of Control Period
1,207,500 14,043 4,918,675 — 6,140,218 
Termination for Death During the Change of Control Period— — 1,613,414 — 1,613,414 
Change of Control— — 1,613,414 — 1,613,414 
Connie ChenTermination Without Cause During the Retention Period912,000 39,491 373,578 15,453 1,340,522 
Termination for Death— — 285,880 — 285,880 
Termination for Disability— — 232,077 — 232,077 
Termination without Cause or Resignation
for Good Reason during the Change of Control Period and Retention Period
912,000 39,491 1,326,498 30,906 2,308,895 
Termination for Death During the Change of Control Period— — 579,341 — 579,341 
Change of Control— — 579,341 — 579,341 
(1)Please note all unvested PRSUs granted under our Annual Incentive Plan will be canceled upon a consummation of a Change in Control and any annual incentive award earned will be paid entirely in cash. Therefore, all payments under the Annual Incentive Plan in a Change of Control scenario was included in the “Cash Severance” column of this table and not the “RSU Awards” column of this table.  The value of accelerated vesting of unvested RSUs and PSUs is based upon the closing stock price on December 31, 2020,30, 2022, which was $9.42$3.43 per share, multipliedshare. For the purpose of calculating the value of the acceleration of PSU awards in connection with a Change of Control in the absence of a termination of employment, this table assumes that such PSUs were not assumed, continued or substituted by the numberacquiror in connection with the Change of unvested RSUs.Control.
(2)The value of accelerated vesting of unvested stock options is based on the difference between the closing stock price on December 31, 2020,30, 2022, which was $9.42$3.43 per share, and the exercise price per option multiplied by the number of unvested options. This does not reflect any dollar value associated with the acceleration of unvested stock options with exercise prices in excess of $9.42$3.43 per share.
(3)Raskin Separation Agreement and Release
On January 18, 2023, Mr. Summe departed fromRaskin agreed to step down as President of Quotient, effective as of March 31, 2023. As a result of this termination of employment by Quotient without “Cause” (as defined in Mr. Raskin’s Change of Control Severance Agreement), he became eligible for the Companyseverance benefits to which he was entitled upon a termination without “Cause” during the Retention Period under his Change of Control Severance Agreement (as described above). As a condition of Mr. Raskin’s receipt of these severance benefits, Mr. Raskin signed a Separation and Release Agreement with Quotient, dated as of March 31, 2023, which included a release of claims in favor of Quotient.
71


Outstanding Equity Awards as of December 31, 2022
The following table sets forth information regarding equity awards held by our NEOs at December 31, 2022.
Option AwardStock Awards
NameNumber of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable(1)
Option
Exercise
Price
($)(2)
Option
Expiration
Date
Number of
Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested (#)(3)
Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($)(4)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested(5)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested(4)
Matthew Krepsik
75,000(6)
525,000 4.03 6/1/2032— — — — 
— — — — 
46,875(7)
160,781 — — 
— — — — 
131,828(8)
452,170 — — 
— — — — 
262,500(9)
900,375 — — 
— — — — — — 63,750218,663 
— — — — — — 54,083 185,505 
Yuneeb Khan— — — — 
522,648(10)
1,792,683 — — 
— — — — 
440,985(11)
1,512,579 — — 
— — — — — — 156,794 537,803 
Connie Chen37,334 — 8.51 2/16/2026— — — — 
12,666 — 8.51 2/16/2026— — — — 
100,000 — 13.00 2/13/2027— — — — 
54,000 — 13.10 3/1/2028— — — — 
79,561(12)
5,305 9.96 3/1/2029— — — — 
96,826(13)
44,012 8.95 3/1/2030— — — — 
15,625(14)
134,375 3.20 7/1/2032— — — — 
— — — — 
2,667(15)
9,121 — — 
— — — — 
20,950(16)
71,649 — — 
— — — — 
30,005(17)
102,617 — — 
— — — — 
93,895(18)
321,121 — — 
— — — — 
70,313(19)
240,470 — — 
— — — — — — 40,006137,221 
— — — — — — 38,250 131,198 
Steven Boal240,000 — 3.70 2/7/2023— — — — 
600,000 — 8.65 11/14/2023— — — — 
503,000 — 8.51 6/29/2025— — — — 
47,000 — 4.19 6/29/2025— — — — 
600,000 — 4.19 6/29/2025— — — — 
800,000 — 4.19 6/29/2025— — — — 
300,000 — 4.19 6/29/2025— — — — 
261,000 — 4.19 6/29/2025— — — — 
299,529 — 4.19 6/29/2025— — — — 
469,461 — 4.19 6/29/2025— — — — 
Scott Raskin23,474 — 10.65 2/6/2027— — — — 
12,931 — 11.60 6/4/2027— — — — 
915,851(20)
211,350 7.34 9/1/2029— — — — 
262,237(21)
119,200 8.95 3/1/2030— — — — 
39,062(22)
335,938 3.20 7/1/2032— — — — 
72


— — — — 
102,180(23)
349,456 — — 
— — — — 
56,739(24)
194,047 — — 
— — — — 
56,010(25)
191,554 — — 
— — — — 
175,270(26)
599,423 — — 
— — — — 
167,344(27)
572,316 — — 
— — — — — — 74,679256,149 
— — — — — — 71,905246,634 
(1)Option is subject to accelerated vesting upon a qualifying termination of the executive’s employment with us as described above in “Potential Payments upon Termination, Change of Control or Certain Other Events.”
(2)For options granted prior to our initial public offering, the amounts in this column represent at least the per-share fair value of a share of our common stock on the date of grant, as determined by our Board or, for options granted after our initial public offering, based on the closing share price of our common stock on the NYSE on the date of grant.
(3)The shares of common stock underlying the RSUs are subject to accelerated vesting upon a qualifying termination of the executive’s employment with us as described above in “Potential Payments upon Termination, Change of Control or Certain Other Events.”
(4)The market values of the RSUs and PSUs in these columns that have not vested are calculated by multiplying the number of units shown in the table by the closing share price of our common stock on December 30, 2022, which was $3.43.
(5)The 2021 PSU awards are subject to vesting based upon the Company's performance against certain performance metrics during the period beginning on January 1, 2021 and ending on December 31, 2020.2023. The shares of common stock underlying the 2021 PSUs reflected in this column are assuming the threshold level of performance conditions will be achieved and will vest upon achievement of targets directly tied to the Company’s performance. The 2022 PSU awards are subject to vesting based upon the Company's achievement of stock price goals during the period beginning on March 1, 2022 and ending on March 1, 2025. The shares of common stock underlying the 2022 PSUs reflected in this column are assuming the threshold level of performance conditions will be achieved and will vest upon achievement of targets directly tied to the Company’s stock price. Both 2021 and 2022 PSU awards are subject to accelerated vesting upon a qualifying termination of the executive’s employment with us as described above in “Potential Payments upon Termination, Change of Control or Certain Other Events.”

Vesting Schedule for Outstanding Stock Options and Restricted Stock Units:
NoteGrantIncremental Vesting Dates
(6)6/1/20221/48 on 7/1/2022; 1/48 monthly thereafter for next 4 years.
(7)5/1/202125% on 5/1/2022; 6.25% quarterly thereafter for next 3 years.
(8)3/1/20226.25% on 6/1/2022; 6.25% quarterly thereafter for next 4 years.
(9)6/1/20226.25% on 9/1/2022; 6.25% quarterly thereafter for next 4 years.
(10)8/1/202225% on 8/1/2023; 6.25% quarterly thereafter for next 3 years.
(11)8/1/20226.25% on 11/1/2022; 6.25% quarterly thereafter for next 4 years.
(12)3/1/20191/48 on 4/1/2019; 1/48 monthly thereafter for next 4 years.
(13)3/1/20201/48 on 4/1/2020; 1/48 monthly thereafter for next 4 years.
(14)7/1/20221/48 on 8/1/2022; 1/48 monthly thereafter for next 4 years.
(15)3/1/20196.25% on 6/1/2019; 6.25% quarterly thereafter for next 4 years.
(16)3/1/20206.25% on 6/1/2020; 6.25% quarterly thereafter for next 4 years.
(17)3/1/20216.25% on 6/1/2021; 6.25% quarterly thereafter for next 4 years.
(18)3/1/20226.25% on 6/1/2022; 6.25% quarterly thereafter for next 4 years.
(19)7/1/20226.25% on 10/1/2022; 6.25% quarterly thereafter for next 4 years.
(20)9/1/201925% on 9/1/2020; 1/48 monthly thereafter for next 3 years.
(21)3/1/20201/48 on 4/1/2020; 1/48 monthly thereafter for next 4 years.
(22)7/1/20221/48 on 8/1/2022; 1/48 monthly thereafter for next 4 years.
(23)9/1/201925% on 9/1/2020; 6.25% quarterly thereafter for next 3 years.
(24)3/1/20206.25% on 4/1/2020; 6.25% quarterly thereafter for next 4 years.
(25)3/1/20216.25% on 4/1/2021; 6.25% quarterly thereafter for next 4 years.
(26)3/1/20226.25% on 4/1/2022; 6.25% quarterly thereafter for next 4 years.
(27)7/1/20226.25% on 8/1/2022; 6.25% quarterly thereafter for next 4 years.
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table provides information regarding exercises of option awards and vesting of stock awards by our NEOs in 2022:
5073



Option AwardStock Awards
NameNumber of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
Value Released on
Exercise ($)
Number of
Shares Acquired on
Vesting
Value Realized on
Vesting ($)(1)
Matthew Krepsik— — 106,046 355,803 
Yuneeb Khan— — 29,398 79,963 
Connie Chen— — 69,618 245,383 
Steven Boal— — 1,277,395 4,218,685 
Scott Raskin— — 258,127 929,949 
Pamela Strayer— — 27,875 174,088 
John Kellerman— — 21,312 96,728 
(1)Calculated by multiplying (i) the closing price of our common stock on the vesting date or if such day is the weekend or a holiday, on the immediately preceding trading day, by (ii) the number of shares of our common stock acquired upon vesting.
CEO Pay Ratio
For the year ended December 31, 2020,2022, the median of the annual total compensation of all employees is $74,430,$78,987, the annual total compensation of our CEO, Mr. Krepsik, is $5,006,593,$4,585,802, and the ratio of these amountsthis amount to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees is approximately 6758 to 1.
This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll record and the methodology described below. Because the SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates, and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.
For purposes of identifying our median compensated employee, we used our global employee population as of December 1, 2020,2022, identified based on our payroll records. We used total compensation as our consistently applied compensation measure. In this context, total compensation means the annual salary or wages, plus target bonuses and commissions as of December 1, 2020.2022. Individuals that did not work for the full year were annualized and amounts paid in foreign currencies were converted to US Dollars based on the applicable average annual exchange rate as of December 1, 2020. This process resulted2022.
Pay Versus Performance Disclosure
As required by SEC rules, the following table summarizes certain information intended to illustrate the relationship between executive compensation “actually paid” and our financial performance in the identificationlast three fiscal years.
“Compensation actually paid,” as calculated pursuant to SEC disclosure rules, differs from the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table in the applicable year due to the impact of two median employees,changes in our stock price as well as the achievement of the underlying vesting conditions with respect to our equity awards, while compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table calculates equity awards based on the grant date fair value of such equity awards and does not include any adjustments for failure to achieve the underlying vesting conditions or changes in our stock price. Amounts shown below as “compensation actually paid” do not reflect what was actually paid to or realized by our NEOs. Furthermore, these amounts are not taken into account by our Compensation Committee in making compensation decisions for our NEOs. For further information concerning our pay-for-performance philosophy and how we hadalign executive compensation with the Company’s performance, please refer to the section of this proxy statement entitled “Compensation Discussion & Analysis—How Pay Decisions Are Made.”
74


Pay Versus Performance
Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On: (4)
Year(1)Summary Compensation Table Total for Krepsik
($)(2)
Summary Compensation Table Total for Boal
($)(2)
Compensation Actually Paid to Krepsik
($)(3)
Compensation Actually Paid to Boal
($)(3)
Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs
($)(2)
Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs
($)(3)
Total Shareholder Return
($)
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return
($)(5)
Net Income
($000)
Adjusted EBITDA
($000)(6)
20224,585,80216,532,7992,363,07312,513,7972,494,501508,66035116(76,511)14,857 
2021N/A3,380,995N/A185,6921,852,293162,97275181(45,568)41,551 
2020N/A5,006,593N/A3,629,3171,942,297878,12696144(65,381)46,037 
(1)The Principal Executive Officer ("PEO") and non-Principal Executive Officers ("non-PEO") for the applicable years were as follows:
2022: Mr. Krepsik and Mr. Boal each served as PEO for a portion of 2022. The non-PEOs for 2022 were: Scott Raskin, Yuneeb Khan, Connie Chen, Pamela Strayer, and John Kellerman.
2021: Mr. Boal served as PEO for the duration of the 2021. The Company’s non-PEOs for 2021 were: Scott Raskin, Pamela Strayer, Matthew Krepsik, and Connie Chen.
2020: Mr. Boal served as PEO for the duration of the 2020. The Company’s non-PEOs for 2020 were: Scott Raskin, Pamela Strayer, Chad Summe, and Connie Chen.
(2)Amounts reported in this column represent (i) the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year in the case of Messrs. Krepsik and Boal and (ii) the average of the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year for Quotient’s non-PEOs.
(3)To calculate compensation actually paid (“CAP”), adjustments were made to the amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year. A reconciliation of the adjustments for Messrs. Krepsik and Boal and for the average of the non-PEOs is set forth following the footnotes to this table.
(4)Pursuant to rules of the SEC, the comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2019. Historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
(5)The TSR Peer Group consists of the S&P North American Technology Sector Index, an even numberindependently prepared index that includes companies in the information technology sector as well as the internet & direct marketing retail, interactive home entertainment, and interactive media & services sub-industries.
(6)The Compensation Committee selected Adjusted EBITDA as the “Company Selected Measure” for purposes of employeesthis table. As reflected below in the section entitled “List of Performance Measures,” we used multiple financial performance measures to link compensation actually paid to the NEOs to Company performance in 2022. The committee determined the most important of these financial performance measures for 2022 to be Adjusted EBITDA, as the highest-weighted corporate performance goal under our annual cash bonus program, and a core driver of December 1, 2020. Asthe Company’s performance, growth and stockholder value creation. Please refer to Appendix B of this proxy statement for a result, we selecteddefinition of Adjusted EBITDA.

75


CAP Adjustments
YEARSummary Compensation Table Total

($)(a)
Minus

Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Option and Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year

($)(b)
Plus

Fair Value at Fiscal Year-End of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Option and Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year

($)(c)
Plus/(Minus)

 Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Option and Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years

($)(d)
Plus/(Minus)

Fair Value at Vesting of Stock Option and Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year that Vested During Fiscal Year

($)(e)
Plus/(Minus)

Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Stock Option and Stock Awards Granted in Prior Years for which Applicable Vesting Conditions Were Satisfied During Fiscal Year

($)(f)
Minus

Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year-End of Stock Option and Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years that Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year

($)(g)
Plus

Dollar Value of Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Stock Awards in Fiscal Year and Prior to Vesting Date

($)(h)
Equals

Compensation Actually Paid

($)
Matthew Krepsik
20224,585,8024,129,281 2,432,238 (187,031)(242,108)(96,547)— — 2,363,073 
Steven Boal
202216,532,79914,152,030 — — 1,078,501 9,054,527 — — 12,513,797 
20213,380,9952,499,995 1,071,967 (972,097)(186,254)(608,924)— — 185,692 
20205,006,5934,499,561 3,916,830 (30,540)(138,033)(625,972)— — 3,629,317 
Non-PEOs (Average (i)
20222,494,5012,140,528 1,358,904 (402,780)(122,014)(330,072)349,351 — 508,660 
20211,852,2931,234,720 538,226 (924,397)(66,118)(2,312)— — 162,972 
20201,942,2971,486,571 1,221,336 (243,371)(28,529)(196,404)330,632 — 878,126 
(a)Represents Total Compensation as reported in the individual who is a U.S. employeeSummary Compensation Table for the indicated fiscal year. With respect to serve as our median employee.the non-PEOs, amounts shown represent averages.
2013 Equity Incentive Plan
(b)Represents the grant date fair value of the stock option and stock awards granted during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with the methodology used for financial reporting purposes. In the eventcase of a change in control as described inMr. Boal, the 2013 Plan,amount shown for 2022 includes the acquiring or successor entity may assume or continue all or anyincremental fair value of his equity awards outstanding underresulting from the 2013 Plan or substitute substantially equivalent awards. Anymodification of such awards which are not assumed or continued in connection with ahis Separation Agreement. In the case of Mr. Krepsik, the amount shown includes the fair value of equity awards granted in connection with his promotion to PEO - please see the Compensation Discussion & Analysis.
(c)Represents the fair value as of the indicated fiscal year-end of the outstanding and unvested option awards and stock awards granted during such fiscal year, computed in accordance with the methodology used for financial reporting purposes.
(d)Represents the change in controlfair value during the indicated fiscal year of the outstanding and unvested option awards and stock awards held by the applicable NEO, granted in previous fiscal years, as of the last day of the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with the methodology used for financial reporting purposes and, for awards subject to performance-based vesting conditions, based on the probable outcome of such performance-based vesting conditions as of the last day of the fiscal year.
(e)Represents the fair value at vesting of the option awards and stock awards that were granted and vested during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with the methodology used for financial reporting purposes. In the case of Mr. Boal, this amount includes the incremental fair value associated with the modification of his outstanding equity awards in connection with his termination of employment.
(f)Represents the change in fair value, measured from the prior fiscal year-end to the vesting date, of each option award and stock award that was granted in a prior fiscal year and which vested during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with the methodology used for financial reporting purposes. In the case of Mr. Boal, this amount includes the incremental fair value associated with the modification of his outstanding equity awards in connection with his termination of employment.
(g)Represents the fair value as of the last day of the prior fiscal year of the option award and stock awards that were granted in a prior fiscal year and which failed to meet the applicable vesting conditions in the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with the methodology used for financial reporting purposes.
(h)Represents the dollar value of any dividends or are not exercised or settledother earnings paid on stock awards in the indicated fiscal year and prior to the changevesting date that are not otherwise included in control will terminate effective asthe total compensation for the indicated fiscal year.
(i)See footnote 1 above for the non-PEOs included in the average for each year.

Relationship Between Pay and Performance
The below series of graphs illustrate the relationship between “compensation actually paid” (or “CAP”) to our PEOs, and to our non-PEOs on average, in each of the timelast three fiscal years as reported above, and (i) our cumulative Total Stockholder Return and Peer Group Total Stockholder Return from December 31, 2019 through December 31, 2022, (ii) net income for each of the change in control. The Compensation Committee may providereported fiscal years and (iii) Adjusted EBITDA for the accelerationeach of vesting of any or all outstanding awards upon such terms and to such extent as it determines, except that the vesting of all awards held by members of the Board who are not employees will automatically be accelerated in full. The 2013 Plan authorizes the Compensation Committee, in its discretion and without the consent of any participant, to cancel each or any outstanding award denominated in shares upon a change in control in exchange for a payment to the participant with respect to each share subject to the cancelled award of an amount equal to the excess of the consideration to be paid per share of common stock in the change in control transaction over the exercise price per share, if any, under the award.
2006 Stock Plan
Our 2006 Stock Plan (the “2006 Plan”) provides that the administrator may adjust the number and class of shares that may be delivered under the plan and each outstanding award and the price of shares under the award in order to preserve the plan’s intended benefits upon certain events, including, without limitation, changes in our capitalization through stock splits, recapitalizations, mergers or consolidations. The 2006 Plan further provides that if, in the event of a merger or change in control, any award is not assumed or replaced with an equivalent substitute award by the successor corporation, then such award will fully vest and be subject to settlement or will become fully exercisable, if applicable, for a specified period prior to the corporate transaction. The award will then terminate upon the expiration of the specified time period.
Equity Grants to Named Executive Officers
In March 2020, Mr. Boal was granted an option to purchase 469,461 shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $8.95 per share. The option will vest in 48 equal monthly installments from March 1, 2020, provided that he remains an employee through the applicable vest date. In March 2020, Mr. Boal was also granted RSUs to acquire 223,463 shares of our common stock. The RSUs will vest in equal quarterly installments over a four-year period beginning March 1, 2020, provided that he remains an employee through each applicable vest date. In March 2020, Mr. Boal was granted 55,865 PRSUs under the Company’s Annual Incentive Plan. In February 2021, the Compensation Committee determined a Company Achievement of 79% for fiscal 2020 under the Annual Incentive Plan. As Mr. Boal's threshold of 80% was not met, none of the PRSUs in Mr. Boal’s Equity Bonus Award vested and and his Equity Bonus Award was cancelled in its entirety. Mr. Boal’s equity awards are subject to accelerated vesting as described above in “Potential Payments upon Termination, Change of Control or Certain Other Events.”
5176



the reported fiscal years. In March 2020,connection with Mr. Raskin was granted an optionBoal’s separation from employment in 2022, he received severance benefits that included cash severance payments, payment of COBRA premiums, and modifications to purchase 381,437 shareshis outstanding equity awards, which severance benefits increased his reported CAP in 2022 significantly.This increase in reported CAP as a result of severance benefits and equity modifications received in connection with Mr. Boal’s separation results in a skewed correlation between PEO CAP and Company performance in 2022. For that reason, we have included additional bars in the graphs which reflect the CAP to Mr. Boal without taking into account his severance benefits ("PEO (Boal) Adjusted CAP"). We believe that these bars more accurately reflect the Compensation Committee’s emphasis on pay for performance as the adjusted CAP amount fluctuated year-over-year, primarily due to the result of our common stock with an exercise priceperformance and our varying level of $8.95achievement against pre-established performance goals under our AIP and LTI program. The supplemental information shown in the graphs should not be viewed as a substitute for the required disclosure regarding the relationship between Company performance and CAP, as required to be calculated per share. The option will vest in 48 equal monthly installments from March 1, 2020, provided that he remains an employee through the applicable vest date. In March 2020, Mr. Raskin was also granted RSUs to acquire 181,564 shares of our common stock. The RSUs will vest in equal quarterly installments over a four-year period beginning March 1, 2020, provided that he remains an employee through each applicable vest date. In March 2020, Mr. Raskin was granted 25,139 PRSUs under the Company’s Annual Incentive Plan. In February 2021, the Compensation Committee determined a Company Achievement of 79% for fiscal 2020 under the Annual Incentive Plan. Following a recommendation from the leadership team, the Compensation Committee exercised its discretion and reduced the payout under the Annual Incentive Plan from 60% to 25% to align with the average payout approved for non-executive employee Annual Incentive Plan participants (as discussed above); and accordingly 12,569 PRSUs of Mr. Raskin’s Equity Bonus Award vested on March 1, 2021. Mr. Raskin’s equity awards are subject to accelerated vesting as described below in “Potential Payments upon Termination, Change of Control or Certain Other Events.”SEC disclosure rules.
In March 2020, Ms. Strayer was granted 18,854 PRSUs under the Company's Annual Incentive Plan. Ms. Strayer was not granted an equity award in March 2020 since she received her new hire grant in November 2019. In February 2021, the Compensation Committee determined a Company Achievement of 79% for fiscal 2020 under the Annual Incentive Plan. Following a recommendation from the leadership team, the Compensation Committee exercised its discretion and reduced the payout under the Annual Incentive Plan from 60% to 25% to align with the average payout approved for non-executive employee Annual Incentive Plan participants (as discussed above); and accordingly 9,427 PRSUs of Ms. Strayer's Equity Bonus Award vested on March 1, 2021. Ms. Strayer’s equity awards are subject to accelerated vesting as described above in “Potential Payments upon Termination, Change of Control or Certain Other Events.”
In March 2020, Ms. Chen was granted an option to purchase 140,838 shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $8.95 per share. The option will vest in 48 equal monthly installments from March 1, 2020, provided that she remains an employee through the applicable vest date. In March 2020, Ms. Chen was also granted RSUs to acquire 67,039 shares of our common stock. The RSUs will vest in equal quarterly installments over a four-year period beginning March 1, 2020, provided that she remains an employee through each applicable vest date. In March 2020, Ms. Chen was granted 12,569 PRSUs under the Company’s Annual Incentive Plan. In February 2021, the Compensation Committee determined a Company Achievement of 79% for fiscal 2020 under the Annual Incentive Plan. Following a recommendation from the leadership team, the Compensation Committee exercised its discretion and reduced the payout under the Annual Incentive Plan from 60% to 25% to align with the average payout approved for non-executive employee Annual Incentive Plan participants (as discussed above); and accordingly 6,284 PRSUs of Ms. Chen’s Equity Bonus Award vested on March 1, 2021. Ms. Chen’s equity awards are subject to accelerated vesting as described above in “Potential Payments upon Termination, Change of Control or Certain Other Events.”
In March 2020, Mr. Summe was granted an option to purchase 99,760 shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $8.95 per share. The option will vest in 48 equal monthly installments from March 1, 2020, provided that he remains an employee through the applicable vest date. In March 2020, Mr. Summe was also granted RSUs to acquire 47,486 shares of our common stock. The RSUs will vest in equal quarterly installments over a four-year period beginning March 1, 2020, provided that he remains an employee through each applicable vest date. In March 2020, Mr. Summe was granted 15,712 PRSUs under the Company’s Annual Incentive Plan. When Mr. Summe left the Company in December 2020, Mr. Summe's Equity Bonus Award and all outstanding unvested equity awards were cancelled. Mr. Summe’s equity awards were subject to accelerated vesting as described above in “Potential Payments upon Termination, Change of Control or Certain Other Events.”

549755866829
5277



Outstanding Equity Awards as of December 31, 2020549755866833
549755866837
The following table sets forthincludes a list of financial performance measures, which in the Company’s assessment represent the most important financial performance measures used by the Company to link compensation actually paid to the NEOs to Company performance for 2022. More information regarding equity awards held by our NEOs at December 31, 2020.
Option AwardStock Awards
NameNumber of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable(1)
Option
Exercise
Price
($)(2)
Option
Expiration
Date
Number of
Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested (#)(3)
Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($)(4)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
Steven Boal
800,000(7)
— 25.00 11/13/2023— — — — 
600,000(7)
— 16.25 11/13/2023— — — — 
600,000(7)
— 8.65 11/13/2023— — — — 
240,000(7)
— 3.70 2/6/2023— — — — 
200,000(7)
— 5.33 2/6/2022— — — — 
503,000(7)
— 8.51 2/16/2026— — — — 
287,496(7)
12,504(7)
13.00 2/13/2027— — — — 
179,437(6)
81,563(6)
13.10 3/1/2028— — — — 
131,043(6)
168,486(6)
9.96 3/1/2029— — — — 
88,023(6)
381,438(6)
8.95 3/1/2030— — — — 
— — — — 
12,500(8)
117,750 — — 
— — — — 
59,688(8)
562,261 — — 
— — — — 
84,717(8)
798,034 — — 
— — — — 
181,564(8)
1,710,333 — — 
— — — — 
55,865(5)
526,248 55,865 526,248 
Scott Raskin
17,605(7)
5,869(7)
10.65 2/6/2027— — — — 
12,931(9)
— 11.60 6/4/2027— — — — 
352,251(7)
774,950(7)
7.34 9/1/2029— — — — 
71,519(6)
309,918(6)
8.95 3/1/3030— — — — 
— — — — 
374,660(10)
3,529,297 — — 
— — — — 
147,521(8)
1,389,648 — — 
— — — — 
25,139(5)
236,809 25,139 236,809 
Pamela Strayer
96,072(7)
258,656(7)
8.66 11/1/2029— — — — 
— — — — 
129,907(10)
1,223,724 — — 
— — — — 
18,854(5)
177,605 18,854177,605 
Connie Chen
12,666(7)
— 8.51 2/16/2026— — — — 
95,832(7)
4,168(7)
13.00 2/13/2027— — — — 
37,125(6)
16,875(6)
13.10 3/1/2028— — — — 
37,128(6)
47,738(6)
9.96 3/1/2029— — — — 
26,407(6)
114,431(6)
8.95 3/1/2030— — — — 
— — — — 
6,250(8)
58,875 — — 
— — — — 
12,500(8)
117,750 — — 
— — — — 
24,003(8)
226,108 — — 
— — — — 
54,470(8)
513,107 — — 
— — — — 
12,569(5)
118,400 12,569 118,400 
Chad Summe
50,000(7)
— 11.40 5/5/2027— — — — 
78,626(6)
— 9.96 3/1/2029— — — — 
18,705(6)
— 8.95 3/1/2030— — — — 
about the ways in which these measures were integrated into the Company’s AIP and LTI programs is included in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis section of this proxy statement.
5378



(1)Option is subject to accelerated vesting upon a qualifying termination of the executive’s employment with us as described above in “Potential Payments upon Termination, Change of Control or Certain Other Events.”
(2)For options granted prior to our initial public offering, the amounts in this column represent at least the per-share fair value of a share of our common stock on the date of grant, as determined by our Board or, for options granted after our initial public offering, based on the closing share price of our common stock on the NYSE on the date of grant.
(3)The shares of common stock underlying the RSUs are subject to accelerated vesting upon a qualifying termination of the executive’s employment with us as described above in “Potential Payments upon Termination, Change of Control or Certain Other Events.”
(4)The market values of the RSUs in this column that have not vested are calculated by multiplying the number of units shown in the table by the closing share price of our common stock on December 31, 2020, which was $9.42.
(5)The shares of common stock underlying the PRSUs will vest upon achievement of targets directly tied to the Company’s performance and are subject to accelerated vesting upon a qualifying termination of the executive’s employment with us as described above in “Potential Payments upon Termination, Change of Control or Certain Other Events.”
Vesting Schedule for Outstanding Stock Options and Restricted Stock Units:
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
NoteIncremental Vesting Dates

ü    Adjusted EBITDA
(6)1/48 monthly for next 4 years.

ü    Revenue
(7)25% 1 year after grant date; 1/48 monthly for next 3 years.
(8)6.25% quarterly for next 4 years.
(9)100% 1 year after grant date
(10)25% 1 year after grant date; 6.25% quarterly for next 3 years.

ü    Stock Price
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table provides information regarding exercises of option awards and vesting of stock awards by our NEOs in 2020:
Option AwardStock Awards
NameNumber of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
Value Released on
Exercise ($)
Number of
Shares Acquired on
Vesting
Value Realized on
Vesting ($)(1)
Steven Boal— — 204,487 1,711,838 
Scott Raskin— — 213,437 1,854,307 
Pamela Strayer— — 43,303 385,397 
Connie Chen— — 123,399 1,075,520 
Chad Summe— — 78,828 661,159 
(1)Calculated by multiplying (i) the closing price of our common stock on the vesting date or if such day is the weekend or a holiday, on the immediately preceding trading day, by (ii) the number of shares of our common stock acquired upon vesting.
401(k) Plan
We maintain a tax-qualified retirement plan that provides eligible employees with an opportunity to save for retirement on a tax advantaged basis. Eligible employees are able to participate in the 401(k) plan following the date they meet the plan’s eligibility requirements, and participants are able to defer a percentage of their eligible compensation subject to applicable annual Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and plan limits. Participants are 100% vested in their deferrals. The 401(k) plan permits us to make matching contributions and profit sharing contributions to eligible participants. We currently make a discretionary matching contribution equal to 50% of salary deferrals, not to exceed the lesser of 3% of compensation or $6,000. Participants are vested 25% per year in matching and profit sharing contributions allocated to their account. Both employee contributions and Company contributions are allocated to individual participant accounts, and then are invested in investment alternatives selected by each participant. The 401(k) plan is intended to qualify under Sections 401(a) and 501(a) of the Code.

5479


EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table includes information as of December 31, 2020 for equity compensation plans:
Plan CategoryNumber of
securities to be issued
upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
Number of securities
remaining available
For future
issuance under equity
compensation plans
Equity compensation plans
   approved by security holders
12,869,075(1)
$11.21(2)
10,142,729(3)
Equity compensation plans
   not approved by security holders
n/an/an/a
Total12,869,07510,142,729
(1)Excludes purchase rights accruing under our 2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
(2)The weighted average exercise price relates solely to outstanding stock option shares since shares subject to RSUs have no exercise price.
(3)Includes 1,675,586 shares of common stock that remain available for purchase under the 2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 8,467,143 shares of common stock that remain available for purchase under our 2013 Equity Incentive Plan. Additionally, our 2013 Equity Incentive Plan provides for automatic increases in the number of shares available for issuance under it on the first day of each year starting on January 1, 2015 and each subsequent anniversary through 2023, by an amount equal to the smaller of (a) 4% of the number of shares of our common stock issued and outstanding on the immediately preceding December 31, or (b) an amount determined by the Board. Our 2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan provides for automatic increases in the number of shares available for issuance under it on the first day of each year starting on January 1, 2015 and each subsequent anniversary through 2023, equal to the smallest of (a) 400,000, (b) 0.5% of the number of shares of our common stock issued and outstanding on the immediately preceding December 31, or (c) an amount determined by the Board. The amounts in this table do not include the evergreen increase that was effective on January 1, 2021.

55



SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth, as of March 31, 2021,2023, except as otherwise indicated, certain information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock (a) by each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the outstanding shares of common stock, (b) by each director and nominee for director, (c) by the NEOs (as defined in “Executive Compensation” above) and (d) by all of our current executive officers and directors as a group.
We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of the SEC. Except as indicated by the footnotes below, we believe, based on the information furnished to us, that the persons and entities named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock that they beneficially own, subject to applicable community property laws.
Applicable percentage ownership is based on 93,331,90698,159,584 shares of common stock outstanding at March 31, 2021.2023. In computing the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, we deemed to be outstanding all shares of common stock subject to options held by that person or entity that are currently exercisable or that will become exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2021.2023. We did not deem these shares outstanding, however, for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner listed in the table below is c/o Quotient Technology Inc., 400 Logue1260 East Stringham Avenue, Mountain View, CA 94043.Suite 600, Salt Lake City, Utah 84106.
Name of Beneficial OwnerNumber of
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
Percent Owned
Directors, Director Nominee(s) and Executive Officers:
Steven Boal(1)
7,922,233 %
Scott Raskin(2)
791,530 *
Pamela Strayer(3)
186,306 *
Connie Chen(4)
455,568 *
Chad Summe(5)
200,335 *
Andrew Jody Gessow(6)
471,719 *
Lorraine Hariton(7)
— — 
Steve Horowitz(8)
398,762 *
Robert McDonald(9)
27,053 *
Michelle McKenna(10)
23,696 *
David Oppenheimer(11)
40,350 *
Christy Wyatt(12)
18,116 *
All executive officers, directors
   and director nominee(s) as
   a group (11 persons)(13)
10,335,333 11 %
5% Stockholders:
Trigran Investments, Inc.(14)
8,755,566 %
The Vanguard Group(15)
6,817,245 %
Miller Value Partners, LLC(16)
6,423,031 %
BlackRock, Inc.(17)
5,968,055 %
Name of Beneficial OwnerNumber of
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
Percent Owned
Directors, Director Nominee(s) and Executive Officers:
Matthew Krepsik(1)
240,023 *
Yuneeb Khan(2)
69,409 *
Connie Chen(3)
694,788 *
Steven Boal(4)
6,756,987 6.88 %
Scott Raskin(5)
3,133,171 3.19 %
Pamela Strayer(6)
96,156 *
John Kellerman(7)
22,123 *
Kimberly Anstett(8)
— *
Andrew Jody Gessow(9)
637,743 *
Lorraine Hariton(10)
32,149 *
Alison Hawkins(11)
10,224 *
Eric Higgs(12)
13,550 *
Robert McDonald(13)
95,847 *
David Oppenheimer(14)
83,762 *
Joseph Reece(15)
53,601 *
Michael Wargotz(16)
— *
All executive officers, directors
   and director nominee(s) as
   a group (12 persons)(17)
1,931,096 1.97 %
5% Stockholders:
Engaged Capital(18)
8,107,150 8.26 %
Lynrock Lake LP(19)
6,567,376 6.69 %
Trigran Investments, Inc.(20)
5,203,508 5.30 %


*Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1% of the outstanding shares of our common stock.
(1)Consists of (i) 3,204,37997,835 shares held of record by Mr. Boal,Krepsik, (ii) 912,3484,688 shares held byissuable upon the SMSEJ Family Trust U/A dated July 18, 2005vesting of which Mr. Boal is a co-trustee,RSUs within 60 days of March 31, 2023, and (iii) 3,237 shares held by the EBB 2011 Trust dated September 23, 2011, of which Stuart Schiff is trustee, (iv) 3,237 shares held by the JMB 2011 Trust dated September 23, 2011, of which Stuart Schiff is trustee, (v) 3,237 shares held by the SEB 2011 Trust dated September 23, 2011, of which Stuart Schiff is trustee, and (vi) 3,795,795137,500 shares that are issuable upon the exercise of stock options, which are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2021. Mr. Boal exercises no voting power and no dispositive power over the shares described in clauses (iii), (iv) and (v) of the preceding sentence.2023.
(2)Consists of (i) 174,20640,010 shares held of record by Mr. Raskin,Khan, and (ii) 617,32429,399 shares issuable upon the vesting of RSUs within 60 days of March 31, 2023.
80


(3)Consists of (i) 258,489 shares held of record by Ms. Chen, (ii) 4,687 shares issuable upon the vesting of RSUs within 60 days of March 31, 2023, and (iii) 431,612 shares that are issuable upon the exercise of stock options, which are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2021.2023.
(3)Consists(4)Based on information set forth in a Form 4 filed with the SEC on July 1, 2022, consists of (i) 42,4572,867,286 shares held of record by Ms. Strayer,Mr. Boal, (ii) 10,8263,237 shares issuable uponheld by the vestingEBB 2011 Trust dated September 23, 2011, of RSUs within 60 dayswhich Stuart Schiff is trustee, (iii) 3,237 shares held by the JMB 2011 Trust dated September 23, 2011, of March 31, 2021,which Stuart Schiff is trustee, and (iii) 133,023(iv) 3,237 shares held by the SEB 2011 Trust dated September 23, 2011, of which Stuart Schiff is trustee. This also includes 3,879,990 shares that are issuable upon the exercise of stock options, which are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2021.2023.
56


(4)(5)Consists of (i) 175,7721,213,128 shares held of record by Ms. Chen,Mr. Raskin, and (ii) 279,7961,920,043 shares that are issuable upon the exercise of stock options, which are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2021.2023. Mr. Raskin stepped down as President effective March 31, 2023.
(5)(6)Based on information set forth in a Form 4 filed with the SECD&O questionnaire completed by Ms. Strayer for FY’2022 on June 3, 2020,January 12, 2023, consists of 200,33596,156 shares held of record by Ms. Strayer as of January 6, 2023.
(7)Based on information set forth in a D&O questionnaire completed by Mr. Kellerman for FY’2022 on January 11, 2023, consists of 22,123 shares held of record by Mr. Summe.Kellerman as of January 6, 2023.
(6)(8)Ms. Anstett holds no shares of record.
(9)Consists of (i) 41,61985,643 shares held of record by Mr. Gessow, (ii) 278,108400,108 shares held of record by the Gessow Family Trust for which Mr. Gessow serves as trustee and (iii) 151,992 shares that are issuable upon the exercise of stock options, which are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2021.2023.
(7)Ms. Hariton holds no shares of record.
(8)(10)Consists of (i) 29,72732,149 shares held of record by Ms. Hariton.
(11)Consists of 10,224 shares held of record by Ms. Hawkins.
(12)Consists of 13,550 shares held of record by Mr. Horowitz, (ii) 325,000Higgs.
(13)Consists of 95,847 shares held of record by the Horowitz Family Trust for which Mr. Horowitz serves as a trusteeMcDonald.
(14)Consists of (i) 62,211 shares held of record by Mr. Oppenheimer and (iii) 44,035(ii) 21,551 shares that are issuable upon the exercise of stock options, which are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2021.2023.
(9)(15)Consists of 27,053(i) 35,000 shares held of record by Mr. McDonald.Reece, and (ii) 18,601 shares issuable upon the vesting of RSUs within 60 days of March 31, 2023,
(10)Consists(16)Mr. Wargotz holds no shares of 23,696 shares held of record by Ms. McKenna.record.
(11)(17)Consists of (i) 24,1871,131,066 shares heldbeneficially owned by our current directors, director nominee(s) and current executive officers, (ii) 57,375 shares issuable upon the vesting of record by Mr. OppenheimerRSUs within 60 days of March 31, 2023 for the benefit of such individuals and (ii) 16,163742,655 shares that are issuable upon the exercise of stock options, which are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2021.2023.
(12)Consists(18)Based on information set forth in a Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on November 14, 2022 by Engaged Capital, LLC, Engaged Capital Holdings, LLC, Glenn W. Welling, Engaged Capital Flagship Master Fund, LP, Engaged Capital Flagship Fund, LP, and Engaged Capital Flagship Fund, Ltd. (collectively, “Engaged Capital”). Engaged Capital, LLC, Engaged Capital Holdings, LLC and Glenn W. Welling have sole voting power over 8,107,150 of 18,116the shares heldreported, shared voting power over zero shares reported, sole dispositive power over 8,107,150 of record by Ms. Wyatt.the shares reported, and shared dispositive power over zero shares reported. Engaged Capital Flagship Master Fund, LP, Engaged Capital Flagship Fund, LP, and Engaged Capital Flagship Fund, Ltd. have sole voting power over 7,505,432 of the shares reported, shared voting power over zero shares reported, sole dispositive power over 7,505,432 of the shares reported, and shared dispositive power over zero shares reported. The address of each of Engaged Capital Flagship Master Fund, LP and Engaged Capital Flagship Fund, Ltd. is c/o Conyers Trust Company (Cayman) Limited, Cricket Square, Hutchins Drive, P.O. Box 2681, Grand Cayman KY1-1111, Cayman Islands. The address of each of Engaged Capital Flagship Fund, LP., Engaged Capital, LLC, Engaged Capital Holdings, LLC and Mr. Welling is 610 Newport Center Drive, Suite 250, Newport Beach, California 92660.
(13)Consists of (i) 5,286,379 shares beneficially owned by our current directors, director nominee(s) and executive officers, (ii) 10,826 shares issuable upon the vesting of RSUs within 60 days of March 31, 2021 for the benefit of such individuals and (ii) 5,038,128 shares that are issuable upon the exercise of stock options, which are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2021.
(14)(19)Based on information set forth in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 11, 202114, 2023 by Lynrock Lake LP, Lynrock Lake Partners LLC and Cynthia Paul (collectively, “Lynrock Lake”). Lynrock Lake has sole voting power over 6,567,376 of the shares reported, shared voting power over zero shares reported, sole dispositive power over 6,567,376 of the shares reported, and shared dispositive power over zero shares reported. The address of Lynrock Lake is 2 International Drive, Suite 130, Rye Brook, NY 10573.
(20)Based on information set forth in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2023 by Trigran Investments, Inc., Douglas Granat, Lawrence A. Oberman, Steven G. Simon, Bradley F. Simon and Steven R. Monieson (collectively, “Trigran Investments”). Trigran Investments Inc. has sole voting power over zero shares reported, shared voting power over 8,755,5664,789,327 of the shares reported, sole dispositive power over zero shares reported, and shared dispositive power over 8,755,5665,203,508 of the shares reported. The address of Trigran Investments Inc. is 630 Dundee Road, Suite 230, Northbrook, IL 60062.
(15)Based
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Under U.S. securities laws, directors, certain officers and persons holding more than 10% of our common stock must report their initial ownership of our common stock and any changes in their ownership to the SEC. To our knowledge, based solely on information set forth in a Schedule 13G/Aour review of copies of the reports filed with the SEC and the written representations of our directors and executive officers that no other reports were required to be filed during fiscal 2022, we believe that for fiscal 2022, all required reports were filed on February 10, 2021 by The Vanguard Group. The Vanguard Group has sole voting power over zero shares reported, shared voting power over 147,541 of the shares reported, sole dispositive power over 6,609,035 of the shares reported, and shared dispositive power over 208,210 of the shares reported. The address of The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.
(16)Based on information set forth in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 16, 2021 by Miller Value Partners, LLC. Miller Value Partners has sole voting power over zero shares reported, shared voting power over 6,423,031 of the shares reported, sole dispositive power over zero shares reported, and shared dispositive power over 6,423,031 of the shares reported. The address of Miller Value Partners, LLC is One South Street, Suite 2550, Baltimore, MD 21202.
(17)Based on information set forth in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 01, 2021 by BlackRock, Inc. BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power over 5,840,897 of the shares reported, shared voting power over zero shares reported, sole dispositive power over 5,968,055 of the shares reported, and shared dispositive power over zero shares reported. The address of BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.timely basis under Section 16(a).
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENTS
In addition to the indemnification required in our Restated CertificateCharter and Bylaws, we have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers. These agreements generally provide for the indemnification of such persons for all reasonable expenses and liabilities incurred in connection with any action or proceeding brought against them by reason of the fact that they are or were serving in such capacity, to the extent indemnifiable under the law. We believe that these charter and bylaw provisions and indemnity agreements are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons as directors and executive officers.
81


Furthermore, as is typical, we have obtained director and officer liability insurance to cover both us and our directors and officers for liabilities that may be incurred in connection with their services to us.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
20202022 Annual Report on Form 10-K and SEC Filings
A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 and2022, as amended by our 2021subsequent 10-K/A filing, as well as our 2023 proxy statement, each as filed with the SEC, isare available, without charge, by mailing a request to Investor Relations, Quotient Technology Inc., 400 Logue1260 East Stringham Avenue, Mountain View, CA 94043.Suite 600, Salt Lake City, Utah 84106. The Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the 10-K/A amendment thereto, and proxy statement are also available at the web address shown on the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and under the “SEC Filings” portion of the “Investor Relations” sectionposted on our website at http://investors.quotient.com/investors/sec-filings/default.aspx. and are available from the SEC at its website www.sec.gov.
OTHER MATTERS
Costs of Solicitation
The Board is soliciting proxies for use at the Annual Meeting. All expenses associated with this solicitation will be borne by Quotient. We knowwill reimburse brokers or other nominees for reasonable expenses that they incur in sending these proxy materials to you if a broker or other nominee holds your shares. In addition to solicitation by mail, some of our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies in person or by telephone for no additional compensation. We have retained D.F. King, to assist in the solicitation of proxies under customary terms and anticipate that this will cost us approximately $8,500 plus certain out-of-pocket expenses.
Stockholders Sharing the Same Address
Quotient has adopted a procedure called “householding.” Under this procedure, Quotient may deliver a single copy of the Notice of Internet Availability and, if you requested printed versions by mail, this proxy statement and the Annual Report to multiple stockholders who share the same address, unless Quotient has received contrary instructions from one or more stockholders. This procedure reduces the environmental impact of our annual meetings and reduces Quotient’s printing and mailing costs. Stockholders who participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy cards. Upon written or oral request, Quotient will deliver promptly a separate copy of the Notice of Internet Availability and, if you requested printed versions by mail, this proxy statement and the Annual Report to any stockholder that elects not to participate in householding.
To receive, free of charge, a separate copy of the Notice of Internet Availability and, if you requested printed versions by mail, this proxy statement or the Annual Report, or separate copies of any future notice, proxy statement, or annual report, you may write or call Quotient at the following email address, physical address, or phone number:
IR@quotient.com
Quotient Technology Inc.
Attention: Investor Relations
1260 East Stringham Avenue, Suite 600
Salt Lake City, Utah 84106
(650) 605-4600 (option 7)
If you are receiving more than one copy of the proxy materials at a single address and would like to participate in householding, please contact Quotient at the email address, physical address, or phone number above. Stockholders who hold shares in “street name” may contact their brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer, or other matters that are likelysimilar organization to request information about householding.
Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Stockholders may present proper proposals for inclusion in our proxy statement and for consideration at the next annual meeting of stockholders by submitting their proposals in writing to our Secretary in a timely manner. For a stockholder proposal to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement for our 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our Secretary must receive the written proposal at our principal executive offices not later than Mach 2, 2024. In addition, such stockholder proposals must comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), regarding the inclusion of stockholder proposals in Company-sponsored proxy materials. Stockholder proposals should be addressed to:
82


Quotient Technology Inc.
Attention: Investor Relations
1260 East Stringham Avenue, Suite 600
Salt Lake City, Utah 84106
Our Bylaws also establish an advance notice procedure for stockholders who wish to present a proposal (including one or more director nominations) before an annual meeting of stockholders but do not intend for the proposal to be included in our proxy statement. Our Bylaws provide that the only business that may be conducted at an annual meeting is business that is (i) specified in our notice with respect to such meeting given by or at the direction of the Board, (ii) otherwise properly brought before the annual meeting by or at the direction of our Board, or (iii) otherwise properly brought before the annual meeting by a stockholder of record entitled to vote at the annual meeting who has delivered timely written notice to our Secretary, which notice must contain the information specified in our Bylaws. To be timely for our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders, our Secretary must receive the written notice at our principal executive offices no earlier than April 5, 2024 and no later than May 5, 2024.
In the event that we hold our 2024 annual meeting of Stockholders more than 30 days before or more than 30 days after the one-year anniversary of the 2023 Annual Meeting. Meeting, then notice of a stockholder proposal that is not intended to be included in our proxy statement must be received no earlier than the close of business on the 120th day before such annual meeting and no later than the close of business on the later of the following two dates: the 90th day prior to such annual meeting; or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such annual meeting is first made.
If however, other matters thata stockholder who has notified us of his, her or its intention to present a proposal at an annual meeting does not appear to present his, her or its proposal at such annual meeting, we are not now known or determined come beforerequired to present the proposal for a vote at such annual meeting.
In addition to satisfying the foregoing requirements under our Bylaws, to comply with the universal proxy rules promulgated by the SEC (once effective), stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than management’s nominees must provide timely notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act no later than June 4, 2024.
Appraisal Rights
Stockholders do not have any appraisal rights in connection with any matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting,Meeting.
Forward-Looking Statements
This proxy statement contains forward-looking statements relating to, among other things, business strategy, financial performance, and expectations for product development, as well as our goals in relation to environmental and social matters. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on these statements and should review the persons namedsections captioned “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for important information about these statements, including the enclosed proxyrisks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to vary materially from the assumptions, expectations and projections expressed in any forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made, and, other than as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or their substitutes will vote such proxy in accordance with their discretion.revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or developments or otherwise.




5783




APPENDIX A
quot00071.jpg
QUOTIENT TECHNOLOGY INC.
2023 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

I. INTRODUCTION
1.1Purposes. The purposes of the Quotient Technology Inc. 2023 Equity Incentive Plan (this “Plan”) are (i) to align the interests of the Company’s stockholders and the recipients of awards under this Plan by increasing the proprietary interest of such recipients in the Company’s growth and success, (ii) to advance the interests of the Company by attracting and retaining officers, other employees, Non-Employee Directors, consultants and independent contractors and (iii) to motivate such persons to act in the long-term best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
1.2Certain Definitions.
Agreement shall mean the written or electronic agreement evidencing an award hereunder between the Company and the recipient of such award.
Board shall mean the Board of Directors of the Company.
Change in Control shall mean, unless such term is otherwise defined by the applicable award Agreement, the occurrence of any one or a combination of the following:
(i)any “person” (as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act) becomes the “beneficial owner” (as such term is defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing more than fifty percent (50%) of the total Fair Market Value or total combined voting power of the Company’s then-outstanding securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors; provided, however, that a Change in Control shall not be deemed to have occurred if such degree of beneficial ownership results from any of the following: (A) an acquisition by any person who on the effective date of the Plan is the beneficial owner of more than fifty percent (50%) of such voting power, (B) any acquisition directly from the Company, including, without limitation, pursuant to or in connection with a public offering of securities, (C) any acquisition by the Company, (D) any acquisition by a trustee or other fiduciary under an employee benefit plan of the Company or one of its Subsidiaries or (E) any acquisition by an entity owned directly or indirectly by the stockholders of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of the voting securities of the Company; or
(ii)an Ownership Change Event or series of related Ownership Change Events (collectively, a “Transaction”) in which the stockholders of the Company immediately before the Transaction do not retain immediately after the Transaction direct or indirect beneficial ownership of more than fifty percent (50%) of the total combined voting power of the outstanding securities entitled to
5884



quot00081.jpgvote generally in the election of Directors or, in the case of an Ownership Change Event described in subsection (iii) of the definition of such term, the entity to which the assets of the Company were transferred (the “Transferee”), as the case may be; or
(iii)a date specified by the Committee following approval by the stockholders of a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company;
provided, however, that a Change in Control shall be deemed not to include a transaction described in subsections (i) or (ii) of this definition in which a majority of the members of the board of directors of the continuing, surviving or successor entity, or parent thereof, immediately after such transaction is comprised of Incumbent Directors.
For purposes of the preceding sentence, indirect beneficial ownership shall include, without limitation, an interest resulting from ownership of the voting securities of one or more corporations or other business entities which own the Company or the Transferee, as the case may be, either directly or through one or more subsidiary corporations or other business entities. The Committee shall determine whether multiple events described in subsections (i), (ii) and (iii) of this definition are related and to be treated in the aggregate as a single Change in Control, and its determination shall be final, binding and conclusive. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to any nonqualified deferred compensation that becomes payable on account of a Change in Control, a transaction or event described in subsections (i), (ii) or (iii) must also constitutes a “change in control event,” as defined in Treasury Regulation §1.409A-3(i)(5) if required in order for the payment not to violate Section 409A of the Code.
Code shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Committee shall mean the Compensation Committee of the Board, or a subcommittee thereof, or such other committee designated by the Board, in each case, consisting of two or more members of the Board, each of whom is intended to be (i) a “Non-Employee Director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act and (ii) “independent” within the meaning of the rules of the New York Stock Exchange or, if the Common Stock is not listed on the New York Stock Exchange, within the meaning of the rules of the principal stock exchange on which the Common Stock is then traded.
Common Stock shall mean the common stock, par value $0.00001 per share, of the Company, and all rights appurtenant thereto.
Company shall mean Quotient Technology Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, or any successor thereto.
Exchange Act shall mean the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Fair Market Value shall mean the closing transaction price of a share of Common Stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange on the date as of which such value is being determined or, if the Common Stock is not listed on the New York Stock Exchange, the closing transaction price of a share of Common Stock on the principal national stock exchange on which the Common Stock is traded on the date as of which such value is being determined or, if there shall be no reported transactions for such date, on the next preceding date for which transactions were reported; provided, however, the Company may in its discretion use the closing transaction
5985


price of a share of Common Stock on the day preceding the date as of which such value is being determined to the extent the Company determines such method is more practical for administrative purposes, such as for purposes of tax withholding. If the Common Stock is not listed on a national stock exchange or if Fair Market Value for any date cannot be so determined, Fair Market Value shall be determined by the Committee by whatever means or method as the Committee, in the good faith exercise of its discretion, shall at such time deem appropriate and in compliance with Section 409A of the Code.
Free-Standing SAR shall mean an SAR which is not granted in tandem with, or by reference to, an option, which entitles the holder thereof to receive, upon exercise, shares of Common Stock (which may be Restricted Stock) or, to the extent set forth in the applicable Agreement, cash or a combination thereof, with an aggregate value equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value of one share of Common Stock on the date of exercise over the base price of such SAR, multiplied by the number of such SARs which are exercised.
Incentive Stock Option shall mean an option to purchase shares of Common Stock that meets the requirements of Section 422 of the Code, or any successor provision, which is intended by the Committee to constitute an Incentive Stock Option.
Incumbent Directorshall mean a director who either (i) is a member of the Board as of the effective date of the Plan or (ii) is elected, or nominated for election, to the Board with the affirmative votes of at least a majority of the Incumbent Directors at the time of such election or nomination (but excluding a director who was elected or nominated in connection with an actual or threatened proxy contest relating to the election of directors of the Company).
Non-Employee Directorshall mean any director of the Company who is not an officer or employee of the Company or any Subsidiary.
Nonqualified Stock Option shall mean an option to purchase shares of Common Stock which is not an Incentive Stock Option.
Other Stock Award shall mean an award granted pursuant to Section 3.4 of the Plan.
Ownership Change Eventmeans the occurrence of any of the following with respect to the Company: (i) the direct or indirect sale or exchange in a single or series of related transactions by the stockholders of the Company of securities of the Company representing more than fifty percent (50%) of the total combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors; (ii) a merger or consolidation in which the Company is a party; or (iii) the sale, exchange, or transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company (other than a sale, exchange or transfer to one or more subsidiaries of the Company).
Performance Award shall mean a right to receive an amount of cash, Common Stock, or a combination of both, contingent upon the attainment of specified Performance Measures within a specified Performance Period.
Performance Measures shall mean the criteria and objectives, established by the Committee, which shall be satisfied or met (i) as a condition to the grant or exercisability of all or a portion of an option or SAR or (ii) during the applicable Restriction Period or Performance Period as a condition to the vesting of the holder’s interest, in the case of a Restricted Stock
86


Award, of the shares of Common Stock subject to such award, or, in the case of a Restricted Stock Unit Award, Other Stock Award or Performance Award, to the holder’s receipt of the shares of Common Stock subject to such award or of payment with respect to such award. Such performance criteria and objectives may include, without limitation, any one or more of the following business criteria for the Company, on a consolidated basis, and/or for specified subsidiaries, business or geographical units or operating areas of the Company (except with respect to the total shareholder return and earnings per share criteria) on an individual basis: the attainment by a share of Common Stock of a specified Fair Market Value for a specified period of time; increase in stockholder value; earnings per share; return on or net assets; return on equity; return on investments; return on capital or invested capital; total stockholder return; earnings or income of the Company before or after taxes and/or interest; earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”); EBITDA margin; operating income; revenues; operating expenses, attainment of expense levels or cost reduction goals; market share; cash flow, cash flow per share, cash flow margin or free cash flow; interest expense; economic value created; gross profit or margin; operating profit or margin; net cash provided by operations; price-to-earnings growth; and strategic business criteria, consisting of one or more objectives based on meeting specified goals relating to market penetration, customer acquisition, business expansion, cost targets, customer satisfaction, reductions in errors and omissions, reductions in lost business, management of employment practices and employee benefits, supervision of litigation, supervision of information technology, quality and quality audit scores, efficiency, and acquisitions or divestitures, or such other goals as the Committee may determine whether or not listed herein. Each such goal may be determined on a pre-tax or post-tax basis or on an absolute or relative basis, and may include comparisons based on current internal targets, the past performance of the Company (including the performance of one or more subsidiaries, divisions, or operating units) or the past or current performance of other companies or market indices (or a combination of such past and current performance). In addition to the ratios specifically enumerated above, performance goals may include comparisons relating to capital (including, but not limited to, the cost of capital), shareholders’ equity, shares outstanding, assets or net assets, sales, or any combination thereof. In establishing a Performance Measure or determining the achievement of a Performance Measure, the Committee may provide that achievement of the applicable Performance Measures may be amended or adjusted to include or exclude components of any Performance Measure, including, without limitation, foreign exchange gains and losses, asset write-downs, acquisitions and divestitures, change in fiscal year, unbudgeted capital expenditures, special charges such as restructuring or impairment charges, debt refinancing costs, extraordinary or noncash items, unusual, infrequently occurring, nonrecurring or one-time events affecting the Company or its financial statements or changes in law or accounting principles. Performance Measures shall be subject to such other special rules and conditions as the Committee may establish at any time.
Performance Period shall mean any period designated by the Committee during which (i) the Performance Measures applicable to an award shall be measured and (ii) the conditions to vesting applicable to an award shall remain in effect.
Prior Plan shall mean the Quotient Technology Inc. 2013 Equity Incentive Plan and each other equity plan maintained by the Company under which awards are outstanding as of the effective date of this Plan.
Restricted Stock shall mean shares of Common Stock which are subject to a Restriction Period and which may, in addition thereto, be subject to the attainment of specified Performance Measures within a specified Performance Period.
87


Restricted Stock Award shall mean an award of Restricted Stock under this Plan.
Restricted Stock Unit shall mean a right to receive one share of Common Stock or, in lieu thereof and to the extent set forth in the applicable Agreement, the Fair Market Value of such share of Common Stock in cash, which shall be contingent upon the expiration of a specified Restriction Period and which may, in addition thereto, be contingent upon the attainment of specified Performance Measures within a specified Performance Period.
Restricted Stock Unit Award shall mean an award of Restricted Stock Units under this Plan.
Restriction Period shall mean any period designated by the Committee during which (i) the Common Stock subject to a Restricted Stock Award may not be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise encumbered or disposed of, except as provided in this Plan or the Agreement relating to such award, or (ii) the conditions to vesting applicable to a Restricted Stock Unit Award or Other Stock Award shall remain in effect.
SAR shall mean a stock appreciation right which may be a Free-Standing SAR or a Tandem SAR.
Service” means a participant’s employment or service with the Company or one of its Subsidiaries, whether as an employee, a Non-Employee Director, a consultant or an independent contractor. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee, a participant’s Service shall not be deemed to have terminated merely because of a change in the capacity in which the participant renders Service or a change in Company or Subsidiary for which the participant renders Service, provided that there is no interruption or termination of the participant’s Service. A participant’s Service shall be deemed to have terminated either upon an actual termination of Service or upon the business entity for which the participant performs Service ceasing to be a Subsidiary. Subject to the foregoing, the Company, in its discretion, shall determine whether a participant’s Service has terminated and the effective date of and reason for such termination.
Stock Award shall mean a Restricted Stock Award, Restricted Stock Unit Award or Other Stock Award.
Subsidiary shall mean any corporation, limited liability company, partnership, joint venture or similar entity in which the Company owns, directly or indirectly, an equity interest possessing more than 50% of the combined voting power of the total outstanding equity interests of such entity.
Substitute Awardshall mean an award granted under this Plan upon the assumption of, or in substitution for, outstanding equity awards previously granted by a company or other entity in connection with a corporate transaction, including a merger, combination, consolidation or acquisition of property or stock; provided, however, that in no event shall the term “Substitute Award” be construed to refer to an award made in connection with the cancellation and repricing of an option or SAR.
Tandem SAR shall mean an SAR which is granted in tandem with, or by reference to, an option (including a Nonqualified Stock Option granted prior to the date of grant of the SAR), which entitles the holder thereof to receive, upon exercise of such SAR and surrender for cancellation of all or a portion of such option, shares of Common Stock (which may be
88


Restricted Stock) or, to the extent set forth in the applicable Agreement, cash or a combination thereof, with an aggregate value equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value of one share of Common Stock on the date of exercise over the base price of such SAR, multiplied by the number of shares of Common Stock subject to such option, or portion thereof, which is surrendered.
Tax Date shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.5.
Ten Percent Holder shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.1(a).
1.3Administration. This Plan shall be administered by the Committee. Any one or a combination of the following awards may be made under this Plan to eligible persons: (i) options to purchase shares of Common Stock in the form of Incentive Stock Options or Nonqualified Stock Options; (ii) SARs in the form of Tandem SARs or Free-Standing SARs; (iii) Stock Awards in the form of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units or Other Stock Awards; and (iv) Performance Awards. The Committee shall, subject to the terms of this Plan, select eligible persons for participation in this Plan and determine the form, amount and timing of each award to such persons and, if applicable, the number of shares of Common Stock subject to an award, the number of SARs, the number of Restricted Stock Units, the dollar value subject to a Performance Award, the purchase price or base price associated with the award, the time and conditions of exercise or settlement of the award and all other terms and conditions of the award, including, without limitation, the form of the Agreement evidencing the award. The Committee may, in its sole discretion and for any reason at any time, take action such that (A) any or all outstanding options and SARs shall become exercisable in part or in full, (B) all or a portion of the Restriction Period applicable to any outstanding awards shall lapse, (C) all or a portion of the Performance Period applicable to any outstanding awards shall lapse and (D) the Performance Measures (if any) applicable to any outstanding awards shall be deemed to be satisfied at the target, maximum or any other level. The Committee shall, subject to the terms of this Plan, interpret this Plan and the application thereof, establish rules and regulations it deems necessary or desirable for the administration of this Plan and may impose, incidental to the grant of an award, conditions with respect to the award, such as limiting competitive employment or other activities. All such interpretations, rules, regulations and conditions shall be conclusive and binding on all parties.
The Committee may delegate some or all of its power and authority hereunder to the Board (or any members thereof) or, subject to applicable law, to a subcommittee of the Board, a member of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer or other executive officer of the Company as the Committee deems appropriate; provided, however, that the Committee may not delegate its power and authority to a member of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer or other executive officer of the Company with regard to the selection for participation in this Plan of an officer, director or other person subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act or decisions concerning the timing, pricing or amount of an award to such an officer, director or other person.
No member of the Board or Committee, and neither the Chief Executive Officer nor any other executive officer to whom the Committee delegates any of its power and authority hereunder, shall be liable for any act, omission, interpretation, construction or determination made in connection with this Plan in good faith, and the members of the Board and the Committee and the Chief Executive Officer or other executive officer shall be entitled to indemnification and reimbursement by the Company in respect of any claim, loss, damage or expense (including attorneys’ fees) arising therefrom to the full extent permitted by law (except
89


as otherwise may be provided in the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and/or By-laws) and under any directors’ and officers’ liability insurance that may be in effect from time to time.
1.4Eligibility. Participants in this Plan shall consist of such officers, other employees, Non-Employee Directors, consultants and independent contractors, and persons expected to become officers, other employees, Non-Employee Directors, consultants and independent contractors of the Company and its Subsidiaries as the Committee in its sole discretion may select from time to time. The Committee’s selection of a person to participate in this Plan at any time shall not require the Committee to select such person to participate in this Plan at any other time. Except as otherwise provided for in an Agreement, for purposes of this Plan, references to employment by the Company shall also mean employment by a Subsidiary, and references to employment shall include service as a Non-Employee Director, consultant or independent contractor. The Committee shall determine, in its sole discretion, the extent to which a participant shall be considered providing Service during an approved leave of absence. The aggregate value of cash compensation and the grant date fair value of shares of Common Stock that may be awarded or granted during any fiscal year of the Company to any Non-Employee Director shall not exceed $750,000 or, in the first year in which a Non-Employee Director is elected or appointed to the Board, $1,000,000.
1.5SharesAvailable. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 5.7 and to all other limits set forth in this Plan, the number of shares of Common Stock initially available for all awards under this Plan, other than Substitute Awards, shall be equal to the number of shares of Common Stock that were available for future grants under the Prior Plan immediately prior to the effective date of this Plan. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 5.7, no more than 11,100,000 shares of Common Stock in the aggregate may be issued under the Plan in connection with Incentive Stock Options. To the extent the Company grants an award under the Plan, the number of shares of Common Stock that remain available for future grants under the Plan shall be reduced by an amount equal to the maximum number of shares subject to such award.
To the extent that shares of Common Stock subject to an outstanding option, SAR, Stock Award or Performance Award granted under the Plan or a Prior Plan, other than Substitute Awards, are not issued or delivered by reason of (i) the expiration, termination, cancellation or forfeiture of such award (excluding shares subject to an option cancelled upon settlement in shares of a related Tandem SAR or shares subject to a Tandem SAR cancelled upon exercise of a related option) or (ii) the settlement of such award in cash, then such shares of Common Stock shall again be available under this Plan; provided, however, that shares of Common Stock subject to an award under this Plan or a Prior Plan shall not again be available for issuance under this Plan if such shares are (x) shares that were subject to an option or stock-settled SAR and were not issued or delivered upon the net settlement or net exercise of such option or SAR, (y) shares delivered to or withheld by the Company to pay the purchase price or the withholding taxes related to an outstanding award or (z) shares repurchased by the Company on the open market with the proceeds of an option exercise.
    The number of shares of Common Stock available for awards under this Plan shall not be reduced by (i) the number of shares of Common Stock subject to Substitute Awards or (ii) available shares under a stockholder approved plan of a company or other entity which was a party to a corporate transaction with the Company (as appropriately adjusted to reflect such corporate transaction) which become subject to awards granted under this Plan (subject to applicable stock exchange requirements).
90


Shares of Common Stock to be delivered under this Plan shall be made available from authorized and unissued shares of Common Stock, or authorized and issued shares of Common Stock reacquired and held as treasury shares or otherwise or a combination thereof.
II. STOCK OPTIONS AND STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS
2.1Stock Options. The Committee may, in its discretion, grant options to purchase shares of Common Stock to such eligible persons as may be selected by the Committee; provided that an Incentive Stock Option may be granted only to an employee of the Company or one of its Subsidiaries in accordance with Section 422 of the Code. Each option, or portion thereof, that is not an Incentive Stock Option, shall be a Nonqualified Stock Option. To the extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined as of the date of grant) of shares of Common Stock with respect to which options designated as Incentive Stock Options are exercisable for the first time by a participant during any calendar year (under this Plan or any other plan of the Company, or any parent or Subsidiary) exceeds the amount (currently $100,000) established by the Code, such options shall constitute Nonqualified Stock Options.
Options shall be subject to the following terms and conditions and shall contain such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of this Plan, as the Committee shall deem advisable:
(a)Number of Shares and Purchase Price. The number of shares of Common Stock subject to an option and the purchase price per share of Common Stock purchasable upon exercise of the option shall be determined by the Committee; provided, however, that the purchase price per share of Common Stock purchasable upon exercise of an option shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant of such option; providedfurther, that if an Incentive Stock Option shall be granted to any person who, at the time such option is granted, owns capital stock possessing more than 10 percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of capital stock of the Company (or of any parent or Subsidiary) (a “Ten Percent Holder”), the purchase price per share of Common Stock shall not be less than the price (currently 110% of Fair Market Value) required by the Code in order to constitute an Incentive Stock Option.
    Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case of an option that is a Substitute Award, the purchase price per share of the shares subject to such option may be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value per share on the date of grant, provided, that the excess of: (a) the aggregate Fair Market Value (as of the date such Substitute Award is granted) of the shares subject to the Substitute Award, over (b) the aggregate purchase price thereof does not exceed the excess of: (x) the aggregate fair market value (as of the time immediately preceding the transaction giving rise to the Substitute Award, such fair market value to be determined by the Committee) of the shares of the predecessor company or other entity that were subject to the grant assumed or substituted for by the Company, over (y) the aggregate purchase price of such shares.
(b)Option Period and Exercisability. The period during which an option may be exercised shall be determined by the Committee; provided, however, that no option shall be exercised later than ten years after its date of grant; providedfurther, that if an Incentive Stock Option shall be granted to a Ten Percent Holder, such option shall not be exercised later than five years after its date of grant. The Committee may, in its discretion, establish Performance Measures which shall be satisfied or met as a condition to the grant of an option or to the exercisability of all or a portion of an option. The Committee shall determine whether an option shall become
91


exercisable in cumulative or non-cumulative installments and in part or in full at any time. An exercisable option, or portion thereof, may be exercised only with respect to whole shares of Common Stock.
(c)Method of Exercise. An option may be exercised (i) by giving written notice to the Company specifying the number of whole shares of Common Stock to be purchased and accompanying such notice with payment therefor in full (or arrangement made for such payment to the Company’s satisfaction) either (A) in cash, (B) by delivery (either actual delivery or by attestation procedures established by the Company) of shares of Common Stock having a Fair Market Value, determined as of the date of exercise, equal to the aggregate purchase price payable by reason of such exercise, (C) authorizing the Company to withhold whole shares of Common Stock which would otherwise be delivered having an aggregate Fair Market Value, determined as of the date of exercise, equal to the amount necessary to satisfy such obligation, (D) in cash by a broker-dealer acceptable to the Company to whom the participant has submitted an irrevocable notice of exercise or (E) a combination of (A), (B) and (C), in each case to the extent set forth in the Agreement relating to the option, (ii) if applicable, by surrendering to the Company any Tandem SARs which are cancelled by reason of the exercise of the option and (iii) by executing such documents as the Company may reasonably request. No shares of Common Stock shall be issued and no certificate representing Common Stock shall be delivered until the full purchase price therefor and any withholding taxes thereon, as described in Section 5.5, have been paid (or arrangement made for such payment to the Company’s satisfaction).
2.2Stock Appreciation Rights. The Committee may, in its discretion, grant SARs to such eligible persons as may be selected by the Committee. The Agreement relating to an SAR shall specify whether the SAR is a Tandem SAR or a Free-Standing SAR.
SARs shall be subject to the following terms and conditions and shall contain such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of this Plan, as the Committee shall deem advisable:
(a)Number of SARs and Base Price. The number of SARs subject to an award shall be determined by the Committee. Any Tandem SAR related to an Incentive Stock Option shall be granted at the same time that such Incentive Stock Option is granted. The base price of a Tandem SAR shall be the purchase price per share of Common Stock of the related option. The base price of a Free-Standing SAR shall be determined by the Committee; provided, however, that such base price shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant of such SAR (or, if earlier, the date of grant of the option for which the SAR is exchanged or substituted).
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case of an SAR that is a Substitute Award, the base price per share of the shares subject to such SAR may be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value per share on the date of grant, provided, that the excess of: (a) the aggregate Fair Market Value (as of the date such Substitute Award is granted) of the shares subject to the Substitute Award, over (b) the aggregate base price thereof does not exceed the excess of: (x) the aggregate fair market value (as of the time immediately preceding the transaction giving rise to the Substitute Award, such fair market value to be determined by the Committee) of the shares of the predecessor company or other entity that were subject to the grant assumed or substituted for by the Company, over (y) the aggregate base price of such shares.
92


(b)Exercise Period and Exercisability. The period for the exercise of an SAR shall be determined by the Committee; provided, however, that (i) no Tandem SAR shall be exercised later than the expiration, cancellation, forfeiture or other termination of the related option and (ii) no Free-Standing SAR shall be exercised later than ten years after its date of grant. The Committee may, in its discretion, establish Performance Measures which shall be satisfied or met as a condition to the grant of an SAR or to the exercisability of all or a portion of an SAR. The Committee shall determine whether an SAR may be exercised in cumulative or non-cumulative installments and in part or in full at any time. An exercisable SAR, or portion thereof, may be exercised, in the case of a Tandem SAR, only with respect to whole shares of Common Stock and, in the case of a Free-Standing SAR, only with respect to a whole number of SARs. If an SAR is exercised for shares of Restricted Stock, a certificate or certificates representing such Restricted Stock shall be issued in accordance with Section 3.2(c), or such shares shall be transferred to the holder in book entry form with restrictions on the shares duly noted, and the holder of such Restricted Stock shall have such rights of a stockholder of the Company as determined pursuant to Section 3.2(d). Prior to the exercise of a stock-settled SAR, the holder of such SAR shall have no rights as a stockholder of the Company with respect to the shares of Common Stock subject to such SAR.
(c)Method of Exercise. A Tandem SAR may be exercised (i) by giving written notice to the Company specifying the number of whole SARs which are being exercised, (ii) by surrendering to the Company any options which are cancelled by reason of the exercise of the Tandem SAR and (iii) by executing such documents as the Company may reasonably request. A Free-Standing SAR may be exercised (A) by giving written notice to the Company specifying the whole number of SARs which are being exercised and (B) by executing such documents as the Company may reasonably request. No shares of Common Stock shall be issued and no certificate representing Common Stock shall be delivered until any withholding taxes thereon, as described in Section 5.5, have been paid (or arrangement made for such payment to the Company’s satisfaction).
2.3Termination of Service.All of the terms relating to the exercise, cancellation or other disposition of an option or SAR (i) upon a termination of Service of the holder of such option or SAR, as the case may be, whether by reason of disability, retirement, death or any other reason, or (ii) during a paid or unpaid leave of absence, shall be determined by the Committee and set forth in the applicable award Agreement.
2.4No Repricing. The Committee shall not, without the approval of the stockholders of the Company, (i) reduce the purchase price or base price of any previously granted option or SAR, (ii) cancel any previously granted option or SAR in exchange for another option or SAR with a lower purchase price or base price or (iii) cancel any previously granted option or SAR in exchange for cash or another award if the purchase price of such option or the base price of such SAR exceeds the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the date of such cancellation, in each case, other than in connection with a Change in Control or the adjustment provisions set forth in Section 5.7. This Section 2.4 shall apply to options and SARs granted under this Plan and the Prior Plan.
2.5No Dividend Equivalents.Notwithstanding anything in an Agreement to the contrary, the holder of an option or SAR shall not be entitled to receive dividend equivalents with respect to the number of shares of Common Stock subject to such option or SAR.
93


III.STOCK AWARDS
3.1StockAwards. The Committee may, in its discretion, grant Stock Awards to such eligible persons as may be selected by the Committee. The Agreement relating to a Stock Award shall specify whether the Stock Award is a Restricted Stock Award, a Restricted Stock Unit Award or, in the case of an Other Stock Award, the type of award being granted.
3.2Terms of Restricted Stock Awards. Restricted Stock Awards shall be subject to the following terms and conditions and shall contain such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of this Plan, as the Committee shall deem advisable.
(a)Number of Shares and Other Terms. The number of shares of Common Stock subject to a Restricted Stock Award and the Restriction Period, Performance Period (if any) and Performance Measures (if any) applicable to a Restricted Stock Award shall be determined by the Committee.
(b)Vesting and Forfeiture. The Agreement relating to a Restricted Stock Award shall provide, in the manner determined by the Committee, in its discretion, and subject to the provisions of this Plan, for the vesting of the shares of Common Stock subject to such award (i) if the holder of such award remains continuously in Service during the specified Restriction Period or (ii) if specified Performance Measures (if any) are satisfied or met during a specified Performance Period, and for the forfeiture of the shares of Common Stock subject to such award (x) if the holder of such award does not remain continuously in Service during the specified Restriction Period or (y) if specified Performance Measures (if any) are not satisfied or met during a specified Performance Period.
(c)Stock Issuance. During the Restriction Period, the shares of Restricted Stock shall be held by a custodian in book entry form with restrictions on such shares duly noted or, alternatively, a certificate or certificates representing a Restricted Stock Award shall be registered in the holder’s name and may bear a legend, in addition to any legend which may be required pursuant to Section 5.6, indicating that the ownership of the shares of Common Stock represented by such certificate is subject to the restrictions, terms and conditions of this Plan and the Agreement relating to the Restricted Stock Award. All such certificates shall be deposited with the Company, together with stock powers or other instruments of assignment (including a power of attorney), each endorsed in blank with a guarantee of signature if deemed necessary or appropriate, which would permit transfer to the Company of all or a portion of the shares of Common Stock subject to the Restricted Stock Award in the event such award is forfeited in whole or in part. Upon termination of any applicable Restriction Period (and the satisfaction or attainment of applicable Performance Measures), subject to the Company’s right to require payment of any taxes in accordance with Section 5.5, the restrictions shall be removed from the requisite number of any shares of Common Stock that are held in book entry form, and all certificates evidencing ownership of the requisite number of shares of Common Stock shall be delivered to the holder of such award.
(d)Rights with Respect to Restricted Stock Awards. Unless otherwise set forth in the Agreement relating to a Restricted Stock Award, and subject to the terms and conditions of a Restricted Stock Award, the holder of such award shall have all rights as a stockholder of the Company, including, but not limited to, voting rights, the right to receive dividends and the right to participate in any capital adjustment applicable to all holders of Common Stock; provided, however, that a distribution or dividend with respect to shares of Common Stock, including a
94


regular cash dividend, shall be deposited with the Company and shall be subject to the same restrictions that apply to the shares of Common Stock with respect to which such distribution was made.
3.3Terms of Restricted Stock Unit Awards. Restricted Stock Unit Awards shall be subject to the following terms and conditions and shall contain such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of this Plan, as the Committee shall deem advisable.
(a)Number of Shares and Other Terms. The number of shares of Common Stock subject to a Restricted Stock Unit Award, including the number of shares that are earned upon the attainment of any specified Performance Measures, and the Restriction Period, Performance Period (if any) and Performance Measures (if any) applicable to a Restricted Stock Unit Award shall be determined by the Committee.
(b)Vesting and Forfeiture. The Agreement relating to a Restricted Stock Unit Award shall provide, in the manner determined by the Committee, in its discretion, and subject to the provisions of this Plan, for the vesting of such Restricted Stock Unit Award (i) if the holder of such award remains continuously in Service during the specified Restriction Period or (ii) if specified Performance Measures (if any) are satisfied or met during a specified Performance Period, and for the forfeiture of the shares of Common Stock subject to such award (x) if the holder of such award does not remain continuously in Service during the specified Restriction Period or (y) if specified Performance Measures (if any) are not satisfied or met during a specified Performance Period.
(c)Settlement of Vested Restricted Stock Unit Awards. The Agreement relating to a Restricted Stock Unit Award shall specify (i) whether such award may be settled in shares of Common Stock or cash or a combination thereof and (ii) whether the holder thereof shall be entitled to receive, on a current or deferred basis, dividend equivalents, and, if determined by the Committee, interest on, or the deemed reinvestment of, any deferred dividend equivalents, with respect to the number of shares of Common Stock subject to such award. Any dividend equivalents with respect to Restricted Stock Units that are subject to vesting conditions shall be subject to the same vesting conditions that apply to the underlying awards. Prior to the settlement of a Restricted Stock Unit Award, the holder of such award shall have no rights as a stockholder of the Company with respect to the shares of Common Stock subject to such award.
3.4Other Stock Awards.  Subject to the limitations set forth in the Plan, the Committee is authorized to grant other awards that may be denominated or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on, or related to, shares of Common Stock, including without limitation shares of Common Stock granted as a bonus and not subject to any vesting conditions, dividend equivalents, deferred stock units, stock purchase rights and shares of Common Stock issued in lieu of obligations of the Company to pay cash under any compensatory plan or arrangement, subject to such terms as shall be determined by the Committee.  The Committee shall determine the terms and conditions of such awards, which may include the right to elective deferral thereof, subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee may specify in its discretion.  Any distribution, dividend or dividend equivalents with respect to Other Stock Awards that are subject to vesting conditions shall be subject to the same vesting conditions that apply to the underlying awards.
3.5Termination of Service.All of the terms relating to the satisfaction of Performance Measures and the termination of the Restriction Period or Performance Period relating to a Stock
95


Award, or any forfeiture and cancellation of such award (i) upon a termination of Service of the holder of such award, whether by reason of disability, retirement, death or any other reason, or (ii) during a paid or unpaid leave of absence, shall be determined by the Committee and set forth in the applicable award Agreement.
IV.PERFORMANCE AWARDS
4.1Performance Awards. The Committee may, in its discretion, grant Performance Awards to such eligible persons as may be selected by the Committee.
4.2Terms of Performance Awards. Performance Awards shall be subject to the following terms and conditions and shall contain such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of this Plan, as the Committee shall deem advisable.
(a)Value of Performance Awards and Performance Measures. The method of determining the value of the Performance Award and the Performance Measures and Performance Period applicable to a Performance Award shall be determined by the Committee.
(b)Vesting and Forfeiture. The Agreement relating to a Performance Award shall provide, in the manner determined by the Committee, in its discretion, and subject to the provisions of this Plan, for the vesting of such Performance Award if the specified Performance Measures are satisfied or met during the specified Performance Period and for the forfeiture of such award if the specified Performance Measures are not satisfied or met during the specified Performance Period.
(c)Settlement of Vested Performance Awards. The Agreement relating to a Performance Award shall specify whether such award may be settled in shares of Common Stock (including shares of Restricted Stock) or cash or a combination thereof. If a Performance Award is settled in shares of Restricted Stock, such shares of Restricted Stock shall be issued to the holder in book entry form or a certificate or certificates representing such Restricted Stock shall be issued in accordance with Section 3.2(c) and the holder of such Restricted Stock shall have such rights as a stockholder of the Company as determined pursuant to Section 3.2(d). Any dividends or dividend equivalents with respect to a Performance Award shall be subject to the same vesting conditions that apply to the underlying awards. Prior to the settlement of a Performance Award in shares of Common Stock, including Restricted Stock, the holder of such award shall have no rights as a stockholder of the Company.
4.3Termination of Service. All of the terms relating to the satisfaction of Performance Measures and the termination of the Performance Period relating to a Performance Award, or any forfeiture and cancellation of such award (i) upon a termination of Service of the holder of such award, whether by reason of disability, retirement, death or any other reason, or (ii) during a paid or unpaid leave of absence, shall be determined by the Committee and set forth in the applicable award Agreement.
V.GENERAL
5.1EffectiveDateand TermofPlan. This Plan shall be submitted to the stockholders of the Company for approval at the Company’s 2023 annual meeting of stockholders and, if approved, shall become effective as of the date of such stockholder approval. This Plan shall terminate as of the first annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders to occur on or after the
96


tenth anniversary of its effective date, unless terminated earlier by the Board. Termination of this Plan shall not affect the terms or conditions of any award granted prior to termination.
Awards hereunder may be made at any time prior to the termination of this Plan, provided that no Incentive Stock Option may be granted later than ten years after the date on which the Plan was approved by the Board. In the event that this Plan is not approved by the stockholders of the Company, this Plan and any awards hereunder shall be void and of no force or effect, and the Prior Plan shall remain in effect in accordance with its terms.
5.2Amendments. The Board may amend this Plan as it shall deem advisable; provided, however, that no amendment to the Plan shall be effective without the approval of the Company’s stockholders if (i) stockholder approval is required by applicable law, rule or regulation, including any rule of the New York Stock Exchange, or any other stock exchange on which the Common Stock is then traded, or (ii) such amendment seeks to modify the Non-Employee Director compensation limit set forth in Section 1.3 or the prohibition on repricing set forth in Section 2.4 hereof; providedfurther, that no amendment may materially impair the rights of a holder of an outstanding award without the consent of such holder.
5.3Agreement. Each award under this Plan shall be evidenced by an Agreement setting forth the terms and conditions applicable to such award. No award shall be valid until an Agreement is executed by the Company and, to the extent required by the Company, executed or electronically accepted by the recipient of such award. Upon such execution or acceptance and delivery of the Agreement to the Company within the time period specified by the Company, such award shall be effective as of the effective date set forth in the Agreement.
5.4Non-Transferability. No award shall be transferable other than by will, the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to beneficiary designation procedures approved by the Company or, to the extent expressly permitted in the Agreement relating to such award, to the holder’s family members, a trust or entity established by the holder for estate planning purposes, a charitable organization designated by the holder or pursuant to a domestic relations order, in each case, without consideration. Except to the extent permitted by the foregoing sentence or the Agreement relating to an award, each award may be exercised or settled during the holder’s lifetime only by the holder or the holder’s legal representative or similar person. Except as permitted by the second preceding sentence, no award may be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged, hypothecated, encumbered or otherwise disposed of (whether by operation of law or otherwise) or be subject to execution, attachment or similar process. Upon any attempt to so sell, transfer, assign, pledge, hypothecate, encumber or otherwise dispose of any award, such award and all rights thereunder shall immediately become null and void.
5.5Tax Withholding. The Company shall have the right to require, prior to the issuance or delivery of any shares of Common Stock or the payment of any cash pursuant to an award made hereunder, payment by the holder of such award of any federal, state, local or other taxes which may be required to be withheld or paid in connection with such award. An Agreement may provide that (i) the Company shall withhold whole shares of Common Stock which would otherwise be delivered to a holder, having an aggregate Fair Market Value determined as of the date the obligation to withhold or pay taxes arises in connection with an award (the “Tax Date”), or withhold an amount of cash which would otherwise be payable to a holder, in the amount necessary to satisfy any such obligation or (ii) the holder may satisfy any such obligation by any of the following means: (A) a cash payment to the Company; (B) delivery (either actual delivery or by attestation procedures established by the Company) to the Company of previously owned
97


whole shares of Common Stock having an aggregate Fair Market Value, determined as of the Tax Date, equal to the amount necessary to satisfy any such obligation; (C) authorizing the Company to withhold whole shares of Common Stock which would otherwise be delivered having an aggregate Fair Market Value, determined as of the Tax Date, or withhold an amount of cash which would otherwise be payable to a holder, in either case equal to the amount necessary to satisfy any such obligation; (D) in the case of the exercise of an option, a cash payment by a broker-dealer acceptable to the Company to whom the participant has submitted an irrevocable notice of exercise or (E) any combination of (A), (B) and (C), in each case to the extent set forth in the Agreement relating to the award. The shares of Common Stock delivered or withheld to satisfy such obligation shall not have an aggregate Fair Market Value in excess of the amount determined by applying the maximum individual statutory tax rate in the employee’s applicable jurisdiction; provided that the Company shall be permitted to limit the number of shares so withheld to a lesser number if necessary, in the judgment of the Committee, to avoid adverse accounting consequences or for administrative convenience. Any fraction of a share of Common Stock which would be required to satisfy such an obligation shall be disregarded and the remaining amount due shall be paid in cash by the holder.
5.6Restrictions on Shares. Each award made hereunder shall be subject to the requirement that if at any time the Company determines that the listing, registration or qualification of the shares of Common Stock subject to such award upon any securities exchange or under any law, or the consent or approval of any governmental body, or the taking of any other action is necessary or desirable as a condition of, or in connection with, the delivery of shares thereunder, such shares shall not be delivered unless such listing, registration, qualification, consent, approval or other action shall have been effected or obtained, free of any conditions not acceptable to the Company. The Company may require that certificates evidencing shares of Common Stock delivered pursuant to any award made hereunder bear a legend indicating that the sale, transfer or other disposition thereof by the holder is prohibited except in compliance with the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder.
5.7Adjustment. In the event of any equity restructuring (within the meaning of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation or any successor or replacement accounting standard) that causes the per share value of shares of Common Stock to change, such as a stock dividend, stock split, spinoff, rights offering or recapitalization through an extraordinary cash dividend, the number and class of securities available under this Plan, the terms of each outstanding option and SAR (including the number and class of securities subject to each outstanding option or SAR and the purchase price or base price per share), the terms of each outstanding Stock Award (including the number and class of securities subject thereto), and the terms of each outstanding Performance Award (including the number and class of securities subject thereto, if applicable), shall be appropriately adjusted by the Committee, such adjustments to be made in the case of outstanding options and SARs in accordance with Section 409A of the Code. In the event of any other change in corporate capitalization, including a merger, consolidation, reorganization, or partial or complete liquidation of the Company, such equitable adjustments described in the foregoing sentence may be made as determined to be appropriate and equitable by the Committee to prevent dilution or enlargement of rights of participants. In either case, the decision of the Committee regarding any such adjustment shall be final, binding and conclusive.
5.8Change in Control. Subject to the terms of the applicable award Agreements, in the event of a “Change in Control,” the Board, as constituted prior to the Change in Control, may, in its discretion:
98


(1)require that (i) some or all outstanding options and SARs shall become exercisable in full or in part, either immediately or upon a subsequent termination of Service, (ii) the Restriction Period applicable to some or all outstanding Stock Awards shall lapse in full or in part, either immediately or upon a subsequent termination of Service, (iii) the Performance Period applicable to some or all outstanding awards shall lapse in full or in part, and (iv) the Performance Measures applicable to some or all outstanding awards shall be deemed to be satisfied at the target, maximum or any other level;
(2)require that shares of capital stock of the corporation resulting from or succeeding to the business of the Company pursuant to such Change in Control, or a parent corporation thereof, be substituted for some or all of the shares of Common Stock subject to an outstanding award, with an appropriate and equitable adjustment to such award as determined by the Board in accordance with Section 5.7; and/or
(3)require outstanding awards, in whole or in part, to be surrendered to the Company by the holder, and to be immediately cancelled by the Company, and to provide for the holder to receive (i) a cash payment or other property in an amount equal to (A) in the case of an option or an SAR, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock then subject to the portion of such option or SAR surrendered, to the extent the vesting conditions applicable to such award have been satisfied or are deemed satisfied pursuant to Section 5.8(a)(1) or the applicable award Agreement, multiplied by the excess, if any, of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock as of the date of the Change in Control, over the purchase price or base price per share of Common Stock subject to such option or SAR, (B) in the case of a Stock Award or a Performance Award denominated in shares of Common Stock, the number of shares of Common Stock then subject to the portion of such award surrendered, to the extent the Performance Measures and vesting conditions applicable to such award have been satisfied or are deemed satisfied pursuant to Section 5.8(a)(1) or the applicable award Agreement, whether or not vested, multiplied by the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock as of the date of the Change in Control, and (C) in the case of a Performance Award denominated in cash, the value of the Performance Award then subject to the portion of such award surrendered, to the extent the Performance Measures and vesting conditions applicable to such award have been satisfied or are deemed satisfied pursuant to Section 5.8(a)(1) or the applicable award Agreement; (ii) shares of capital stock of the corporation resulting from or succeeding to the business of the Company pursuant to such Change in Control, or a parent corporation thereof, having a fair market value not less than the amount determined under clause (i) above; or (iii) a combination of the payment of cash pursuant to clause (i) above and the issuance of shares pursuant to clause (ii) above.
5.9Deferrals and Section 409A. The Committee may determine that the delivery of shares of Common Stock or the payment of cash, or a combination thereof, upon the settlement of all or a portion of any award made hereunder, other than awards of options or SARs, shall be deferred, or the Committee may, in its sole discretion, approve deferral elections made by holders of awards. Deferrals shall be for such periods and upon such terms as the Committee may determine in its sole discretion, subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the Code. Awards under the Plan are intended to comply with, or be exempt from, the applicable requirements of Section 409A of the Code and shall be limited, construed and interpreted in accordance with such intent. Although the Company does not guarantee any particular tax treatment, to the extent that any award is subject to Section 409A of the Code, it shall be paid in a manner that is intended to comply with Section 409A of the Code, including regulations and any other guidance issued by the Secretary of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service with respect thereto. In no event whatsoever shall the Company be liable for any additional tax, interest or penalties that
99


may be imposed on the participant by Section 409A of the Code or any damages for failing to comply with Section 409A of the Code. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan or any Award Agreement to the contrary, each participant shall be solely responsible for the tax consequences of awards, and in no event shall the Company have any responsibility or liability if an award does not meet any applicable requirements of Section 409A. Although the Company intends to administer the Plan to prevent taxation under section 409A, the Company does not represent or warrant that the Plan or any award complies with Section 409A or any other provision of federal, state, local or other tax law.
5.10NoRight ofParticipation or Service. Unless otherwise set forth in an employment agreement, no person shall have any right to participate in this Plan. Neither this Plan nor any award made hereunder shall confer upon any person any right to continued employment by or service with the Company, any Subsidiary or any affiliate of the Company or affect in any manner the right of the Company, any Subsidiary or any affiliate of the Company to terminate the employment or service of any person at any time without liability hereunder.
5.11Rights as Stockholder. No person shall have any right as a stockholder of the Company with respect to any shares of Common Stock or other equity security of the Company which is subject to an award hereunder unless and until such person becomes a stockholder of record with respect to such shares of Common Stock or equity security.
5.12Designation of Beneficiary. To the extent permitted by the Company, a holder of an award may file with the Company a written designation of one or more persons as such holder’s beneficiary or beneficiaries (both primary and contingent) in the event of the holder’s death or incapacity. To the extent an outstanding option or SAR granted hereunder is exercisable, such beneficiary or beneficiaries shall be entitled to exercise such option or SAR pursuant to procedures prescribed by the Company. Each beneficiary designation shall become effective only when filed in writing with the Company during the holder’s lifetime on a form prescribed by the Company. The spouse of a married holder domiciled in a community property jurisdiction shall join in any designation of a beneficiary other than such spouse. The filing with the Company of a new beneficiary designation shall cancel all previously filed beneficiary designations. If a holder fails to designate a beneficiary, or if all designated beneficiaries of a holder predecease the holder, then each outstanding award held by such holder, to the extent vested or exercisable, shall be payable to or may be exercised by such holder’s executor, administrator, legal representative or similar person.
5.13Awards Subject to Clawback. The awards granted under this Plan and any cash payment or shares of Common Stock delivered pursuant to such an award are subject to forfeiture, recovery by the Company or other action pursuant to the applicable award Agreement or any clawback or recoupment policy which the Company may adopt from time to time, including without limitation any such policy which the Company may be required to adopt under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and implementing rules and regulations thereunder, or as otherwise required by law.
5.14Governing Law. This Plan, each award hereunder and the related Agreement, and all determinations made and actions taken pursuant thereto, to the extent not otherwise governed by the Code or the laws of the United States, shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware and construed in accordance therewith without giving effect to principles of conflicts of laws.
100


5.15Foreign Employees. Without amending this Plan, the Committee may grant awards to eligible persons who are foreign nationals and/or reside outside of the United States on such terms and conditions different from those specified in this Plan as may in the judgment of the Committee be necessary or desirable to foster and promote achievement of the purposes of this Plan and, in furtherance of such purposes the Committee may make such modifications, amendments, procedures, subplans and the like as may be necessary or advisable to comply with provisions of laws in other countries or jurisdictions in which the Company or its Subsidiaries operates or has employees.
101


APPENDIX B
Non-GAAP Financial Measure and Key Operating Metrics
Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“Adjusted EBITDA”), a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure, is a key metric used by our management and our Board of Directors to understand and evaluate our core operating performance and trends, to prepare and approve our annual budget, to develop short and long-term operational plans, and to determine bonus payouts. In particular, we believe that the exclusion of certain income and expenses in calculating Adjusted EBITDA can provide a useful measure for period-to-period comparisons of our core business. Additionally, Adjusted EBITDA is a key financial metric used by the compensation committee of our Board of Directors in connection with the determination of compensation for our executive officers. Accordingly, we believe that Adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our operating results in the same manner as for our management and Board of Directors.
Adjusted EBITDA excludes non-cash charges, such as depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation, because such non-cash expenses in any specific period may not directly correlate to the underlying performance of our business operations and can vary significantly between periods. Additionally, it excludes the effects of interest expense; income taxes; other (income) expense, net; change in fair value contingent consideration; impairment of certain long-lived and right-of-use assets; litigation settlements; restructuring charges; shareholder activism response costs; certain business transformation and strategic initiatives costs; impairment of certain intangible assets; a loss contingency/settlement related to a contract dispute; and certain acquisition related costs. We exclude certain items because we believe that these costs (benefits) do not reflect expected future operating expenses. Additionally, certain items are inconsistent in amounts and frequency, making it difficult to contribute to a meaningful evaluation of our current or past operating performance.
Net loss and Adjusted EBITDA for each of the periods presented were as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
202220212020
(in thousands)
Net loss$(76,511)$(45,568)$(65,381)
Adjusted EBITDA$14,857 $41,551 $46,037 
Our use of Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and one should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under U.S. GAAP. Some of these limitations are:
although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized may have to be replaced in the future, and Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect cash capital expenditure requirements for such replacements or for new capital expenditure requirements;
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect interest and tax payments that may represent a reduction in cash available to us;
Adjusted EBITDA also does not include the effects of stock-based compensation; depreciation; amortization of acquired intangible assets; change in fair value of contingent consideration; interest expense; other (income) expense, net; provision for income taxes; impairment of certain long-lived and right-of-use assets; litigation settlements; restructuring charges; shareholder activism response costs; certain business transformation and strategic initiatives costs; impairment of certain intangible assets; a loss contingency/settlement related to a contract dispute; and certain acquisition related costs; and
other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate Adjusted EBITDA differently, which reduces its usefulness as a comparative measure.
A reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net loss, the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure, for each of the periods presented is set forth as follows:
102


Year Ended December 31,
202220212020
(in thousands)
Net loss$(76,511)$(45,568)$(65,381)
Adjustments:
Stock-based compensation32,45322,81228,371
Depreciation and amortization17,92929,46436,352
Other (1)35,85114,43312,361
Change in fair value of contingent consideration1,39220,234
Interest expense5,64115,17714,521
Other income (expense), net(1,028)210(1,140)
Provision for income taxes5223,631719
Total adjustments$91,368 $87,119 $111,418 
Adjusted EBITDA$14,857 $41,551 $46,037 
(1)For the year ended December 31, 2022, Other includes a charge of $11.4 million related to the impairment of certain long-lived and right-of-use assets; $9.3 million related to litigation settlements; $8.9 million related to restructuring charges; $4.9 million related to shareholder activism response costs, and $1.3 million related to certain business transformation and strategic initiatives costs which includes $1.0 million related to the launch and scaling of Shopmium in the U.S. to replace coupons.com as our direct-to-consumer offering. For the year ended December 31, 2021, Other includes a charge of $9.1 million related to the impairment of certain intangible assets due to the circumstances surrounding the termination of our partnership with Albertsons, restructuring charges of $2.7 million, acquisition related costs of $1.7 million and $0.9 million in adjusted shareholder activism response costs. For the year ended December 31, 2020, Other includes a $8.8 million loss contingency/settlement related to a contract dispute with Albertsons associated with a guaranteed distribution fee arrangement, acquisition related costs of $2.0 million and restructuring charges of $1.5 million. Restructuring charges primarily relate to severance for impacted employees. Acquisition related costs primarily include certain bonuses contingent upon the acquired company meeting certain financial metrics over the contingent consideration period, together with diligence, accounting, and legal expenses incurred related to certain acquisitions. Additionally, beginning Q1 2022, shareholder activism response costs were excluded from Adjusted EBITDA. Prior period results have been revised for comparability which impacted Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2021.
This non-GAAP financial measure is not intended to be considered in isolation from, as substitute for, or as superior to, the corresponding financial measure prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Because of these and other limitations, Adjusted EBITDA should be considered along with U.S. GAAP-based financial performance measures, including various cash flow metrics, net loss, and our other U.S. GAAP financial results.
103


QUOTIENT TECHNOLOGY INC._V_PRXY_GT20_P96591_23(#72515) - C1_Page_1.jpg
104


QUOTIENT TECHNOLOGY INC._V_PRXY_GT20_P96591_23(#72515) - CC_Page_2.jpg
105